Методика психологической диагностики компонентов общей дискриминационной установки

Rail Shamionov; Venera Abutalipova

doi:10.21638/spbu16.2024.405

Authors

Rail Shamionov Saratov State University, 83, ul. Astrakhanskaya, Saratov, 410012, Russian Federation
Venera Abutalipova Saratov State University, 83, ul. Astrakhanskaya, Saratov, 410012, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2024.405%20

Abstract

The study draws attention to the fact that the diagnosis of discriminatory attitudes carries important information not only about the integration of representatives of out-groups into society, but also about the ability of society itself to develop. Despite the instability of researchers' interest in studying various aspects of the problem of accepting inequality due to various characteristics of "otherness" (age, gender, ethnicity, illness, etc.), the relevance of socio-psychological analysis of discriminatory attitudes remains equally significant. The purpose of this study is to develop and validate a methodology for diagnosing components of a common discriminatory attitude. The study involved 700 people, including 322 men (46%), 376 women (54%) aged 18 to 50 years (M=22.43 SD=8.23). We assumed that the structure of the discriminatory attitude is similar to the structure of the social attitude and includes three components (emotive, cognitive and conative). The design of the study involved exploratory and confirmatory, factor analysis, correlation analysis and analysis of general statistics. To identify the components of a general discriminatory attitude, we have developed questions related to the emotive and behavioral components, and the cognitive component is measured using the questions of orientation to social dominance of the J. R.R. Tolkien methodology. Dakkita. In addition, questions aimed at directly assessing the degree of rejection of representatives of out-groups (target groups of discrimination) were used to assess convergent validity. The substantive validity of the items assigned to the components and the scale as a whole is confirmed by the assessment of specialists. As a result of the study, the three-component structure of the discriminatory attitude was confirmed, the reliability of the scales was assessed by removing a point and the scale as a whole, convergent validity was established by calculating correlations of the components of the attitude and the scale questions of direct assessment of the severity of rejection of representatives of out groups. The psychometric indicators of the technique meet the basic requirements for diagnostic tools.

Keywords:

personality, in-group, out-group, discriminatory attitude, diagnosis, structure, components, validation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Литература

Альперович В. Д., Бзезян А. А., Лабунская В. А., Погонцева Д. В. Этнолукизм: эмпирическая модель и методы исследования: коллективная монография / под науч. ред. проф. В. А. Лабунской. Ростов-на-Дону: Мини Тайп, 2018.

Григорьев Д. С. Модель содержания стереотипов и этнические стереотипы в России // Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии. 2020. Т. 23, № 2. C. 215–244. https://doi.org/10.31119/jssa.2020.23.2.9

Григорьев Д. С. Разработка короткой версии шкал из методики Дж. Даккита: авторитаризм правого толка, ориентация на социальное доминирование, вера в опасный и конкурентный мир // Национальный психологический журнал. 2017. № 4 (28). С. 30–44. https://doi.org/10.11621/npj.2017.0403

Гулевич О. А., Аникеенок О. А., Безменова И. К. Социальные верования: адаптация методик Дж. Даккита // Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. 2014. Т. 11, № 2. С. 68–89.

Гулевич О. А., Сариева И. Р., Прусова И. С. Этнические предрассудки в России: Методика для измерения предрассудков в отношении к мигрантам (на английском языке) // Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. 2015. Т. 12, № 2. С. 112–132. https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2015-2-112-132

Лебедева Н. М., Татарко А. Н., Берри Д. Социально-психологические основы мультикультурализма: проверка гипотез о межкультурном взаимодействии в российском контексте // Психологический журнал. 2016. Т. 37, № 2. С. 92–104.

Наследов А. Д. Математические методы психологического исследования. Анализ и интерпретация данных. СПб.: Речь, 2004.

Рягузова Е. В. Социокультурный парадокс (антиномия) различения «Я–Другой» // Известия Саратовского университета. Новая серия. Сер. Философия. Психология. Педагогика. 2016. Т. 16, вып. 1. С. 85–89.

Стефаненко Т. Г. Этнопсихология. М.: Институт психологии РАН; Академический проект, 1999.

Татарко А. Н., Лебедева Н. М. Методы этнической и кросскультурной психологии: учеб.-метод. пособие. М.: Изд. дом ВШЭ, 2011.

Шамионов Р. М. Индивидуальные ценности и идеологические установки как предикторы предубежденности по отношению к Другим // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Сер. Психология и педагогика. 2019. Т. 16, № 3. С. 309–326. http://dx.doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2019-16-3-309-326

Asbrock F., Sibley C. G., Duckitt J. Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice: A longitudinal test // European Journal of Personality. 2010. Vol. 24, no. 4. P. 324–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.746

Berry J. W., Kalin R. Multicultural and ethnic attitudes in Canada: An overview of the 1991 National Survey // Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement. 1995. Vol. 27, no. 3. P. 301–320. https://doi.org/10.1037/0008-400X.27.3.301

Bor A., Jørgensen F., Petersen M. B. Discriminatory attitudes against unvaccinated people during the pandemic // Nature. 2023. Vol. 613. P. 704–711. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05607-y

Bye H. H. Intergroup relations during the refugee crisis: Individual and cultural stereotypes and prejudices and their relationship with behavior toward asylum seekers // Frontiers in Psychology. 2020. Vol. 11. Art. no. 612267. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.612267

Cantal C., Milfont T. L., Wilson M. S., Gouveia V. V. Differential effects of Right Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation on dimensions of generalized prejudice in Brazil // European Journal of Personality. 2014. Vol. 29, no. 1. P. 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1978

Chaney K. E., Forbes M. We stand in solidarity with you (If it helps our ingroup) // Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. 2023. Vol. 26, no. 2. P. 304–320.

Cook C. L., Li Ye. J., Newell S. M., Cottrell C. A., Neel R. The world is a scary place: Individual differences in belief in a dangerous world predict specific intergroup prejudices // Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 2018. Vol. 21, no. 4. P. 584–596. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430216670024

Cuddy A. J. C., Fiske S. T., Glick P. Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map // Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 2008. Vol. 40. P. 61–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00002-0

Fladmoe A., Orupabo J., Brekke J.-P., Mohn F. Holding back: The impact of motivation to control prejudice on stereotypes about immigrants // Nordic Journal of Migration Research. 2024. Vol. 14, issue 1. P. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.33134/njmr.541

Pettigrew T. F., Meertens R. W. Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe // European Journal of Social Psychology. 1995. Vol. 57. P. 57–75.

Rudman L. A., Ashmore R. D. Discrimination and the Implicit Association Test // Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 2007. Vol. 10, no. 3. P. 359–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430207078696

Taormina R. J., Shamionov R. M. A new measure of traditional values across cultures: China and Russia compared // Psychological Thought. 2016. Vol. 9, no. 2. P. 197–221.

Váradi L., Barna I., Németh R. Whose norms, whose prejudice? The dynamics of perceived group norms and prejudice in new secondary school classes // Front. Psychol. 2021. Vol. 11. Art. no. 524547. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.524547

Verhaeghe P.-P., Martiniello B., Bourabain D. Ethnic prejudices and public support for anti-discrimination policies on the housing market // Ethnicities. 2023. Vol. 23, issue 2. P. 258–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687968221141972

References

Alperovich, V. D., Bzezyan, A. A., Labunskaya, V. A., Pogontseva, D. V. (2018). Ethnolucism: an empirical model and research methods. Collective monograph. Rostov-on-Don, Mini Taip Publ. (In Russian)

Asbrock, F., Sibley, C. G., Duckitt, J. (2010). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice: A longitudinal test. European Journal of Personality, 24 (4), 324–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.746

Berry, J. W., Kalin, R. (1995). Multicultural and ethnic attitudes in Canada: An overview of the 1991 National Survey. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 27 (3), 301–320. https://doi.org/10.1037/0008-400X.27.3.301

Bor, A., Jørgensen, F., Petersen, M. B. (2023). Discriminatory attitudes against unvaccinated people during the pandemic. Nature, 613, 704–711. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05607-y

Bye, H. H. (2020). Intergroup relations during the refugee crisis: Individual and cultural stereotypes and prejudices and their relationship with behavior toward asylum seekers. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 612267. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.612267

Cantal, C., Milfont, T. L., Wilson, M. S., Gouveia, V. V. (2014). Differential effects of right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on dimensions of generalized prejudice in Brazil. European Journal of Personality, 29 (1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1978

Chaney, K. E., Forbes, M. (2023). We stand in solidarity with you (If it helps our ingroup). Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 26 (2), 304–320.

Cook, C. L., Li, Ye. J., Newell, S. M., Cottrell, C. A., Neel, R. (2018). The world is a scary place: Individual differences in belief in a dangerous world predict specific intergroup prejudices. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21 (4), 584–596. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430216670024

Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., Glick, P. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 61–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00002-0

Fladmoe, A., Orupabo, J., Brekke, J.-P., Mohn, F. (2024). Holding back: The impact of motivation to control prejudice on stereotypes about immigrants. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 14 (1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.33134/njmr.541

Grigoriev, D. S. (2017). Development of a short version of the scales from the methodology of J. Duckitt: right-wing authoritarianism, orientation towards social dominance, faith in a dangerous and competitive world. Natsional'nyi psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 4 (28), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.11621/npj.2017.0403 (In Russian)

Grigoriev, D. S. (2020). The stereotype content model and ethnic stereotypes in Russia. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial’noi antropologii, 23(2), 215–244. https://doi.org/10.31119/jssa.2020.23.2.9 (In Russian)

Gulevich, O. A., Anikeenok, O. A., Bezmenova, I. K. (2014). Social beliefs: adaptation of D. Duckitt’s methods. Psikhologiia. Zhurnal Vysshei Shkoly Ekonomiki, 11 (2), 68–89. (In Russian)

Gulevich, O. A., Sarieva, I. R., Prusova, I. S. (2015). Ethnic prejudices in Russia: Methodology for measuring prejudice against migrants. Psikhologiia. Zhurnal Vysshei Shkoly Ekonomiki, 12 (2), 112–132. https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2015-2-112-132

Lebedeva, N. M., Tatarko, A. N., Berry, D. (2016). Socio-psychological foundations of multiculturalism: testing hypotheses about intercultural interaction in the Russian context. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 37 (2), 92–104. (In Russian)

Nasledov, A. D. (2004). Mathematical methods of psychological research. Data analysis and interpretation. St. Petersburg, Rech’ Publ. (In Russian)

Pettigrew, T. F., Meertens, R. W. (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 57, 57–75.

Rudman, L. A., Ashmore, R. D. (2007). Discrimination and the Implicit Association Test. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10 (3), 359–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430207078696

Ryaguzova, E. V. (2016). Sociocultural paradox (antinomy) of the distinction Self–Other. IIzvestiia Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaia seriia. Ser. Filosofiia. Psikhologiia. Pedagogika, 16 (1), 85–89. (In Russian)

Shamionov, R. M. (2019). Individual values and ideological attitudes as predictors of prejudice towards Others. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Ser. Psikhologiia i pedagogika, 16 (3), 309–326. http://dx.doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2019-16-3-309-326 (In Russian)

Stefanenko, T. G. (1999) Ethnopsychology. Moscow, Institute of Psychology RAS Press, Akademicheskii proekt Publ. (In Russian)

Taormina, R. J., Shamionov, R. M. (2016). A new measure of traditional values across cultures: China and Russia compared. Psychological Thought, 9 (2), 197–221.

Tatarko, A. N., Lebedeva, N. M. (2011). Methods of ethnic and cross-cultural psychology. Moscow, Higher School of Economics Press. (In Russian)

Váradi, L., Barna, I., Németh, R. (2021). Whose norms, whose prejudice? The dynamics of perceived group norms and prejudice in new secondary school classes. Front. Psychol., 11, 524547. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.524547

Verhaeghe, P.-P., Martiniello, B., Bourabain, D. (2023). Ethnic prejudices and public support for anti-discrimination policies on the housing market. Ethnicities, 23 (2), 258–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687968221141972