Ordinary ideas about self-determination of personality: Structure and phenomenology

Authors

  • Maria Odintsova St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
  • Natalia Moskvicheva St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
  • Svetlana Kostromina St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
  • Elena Zinovyeva St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2023.305

Abstract

The article is devoted to the description of ordinary ideas about the phenomenon of selfdetermination, which is actively discussed in modern scientific literature. The theoretical foundations for the development of the concept of “self-determination” and a multilevel complementary model of this phenomenon are presented. The results of the empirical study of common ideas about this concept as a way of empirical verification of the theoretical model and clarification of its content are presented. The study was conducted using a semi-structured interview, the sample consisted of 72 respondents (mean age — 23.7 (SD = 5.34; M0 = 21; Me = 22)). It was revealed that most of the respondents had not heard about the concept of self-determination before (63.9%), however, they can roughly describe its content. Most often, when describing self-determination, there are such characteristics as self-understanding, selfdetermination and self-knowledge; independence in behavior; the ability to make decisions; control over one’s life; striving for results and achievements; the presence of a pronounced motivation for action; awareness; as well as indications of connection with the concepts of freedom, responsibility, reflection. The revealed common ideas are consistent with scientific ideas about self-determination as a set of characteristics and processes of an individual’s activity, which are distinguished by purposefulness, arbitrary regulation and relative freedom from external factors. More than half of the respondents (60%) consider themselves to be self-determined people, and when describing other people, they consider them to be self-determined, based primarily on their ability to overcome life’s obstacles. Comparison of the data obtained with the developed theoretical complementary model of self-determination showed that in ordinary concepts, it is possible to distinguish the components of all three levels of the complementary theoretical model: meaningful self-determination (highest level), activity self-determination (middle level), and spontaneous self-determination (basic level). Mostly, ordinary ideas contain characteristics of the activity level, however, when differentiating the concepts of self-regulation and self-determination, the respondents point to the semantic accents of the phenomenon of self-determination: a mature attitude and responsibility for building one’s life.

Keywords:

self-determination, personality, subjectness, autonomy, freewill, self-organization, self-regulation, semantic choice, behavior determination, level model

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Зиновьева Е. В., Костромина С. Н. Интеграция опыта: между прошлым и будущим // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Психология. 2022. Т. 12, вып. 2. С. 186–203. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2022.207

Козлова Ю. В., Гришина Н. В. Изменяющаяся личность в изменяющемся мире — дискурсивные представления и представления обыденного сознания: сравнительный анализ // Психология личности: пребывание в изменении / под ред. Н. В. Гришиной. СПб.: Изд-во С.-Петерб. ун-та, 2019. С. 185–220.

Колотаев В. А., Улыбина Е. В. Стадиальная модель развития идентичности субъекта в культурно-историческом контексте (к проблеме роста самодетерминации в ее осуществлении) // Мир психологии. 2012. Т. 1, № 69. С. 61–67.

Костромина С. Н., Филатова А. Ф., Москвичева Н. Л., Зиновьева Е. В., Одинцова М. М. Комплементарная модель самодетерминации личности // Российский психологический журнал. 2023. Т. 20, № 1. С. 82–99.

Леонтьев Д. А. Психология свободы: к постановке проблемы самодетерминации личности // Психологический журнал. 2000. Т. 21, № 1. С. 15–25.

Леонтьев Д. А. Личностный потенциал: структура и диагностика. М.: Смысл, 2011.

Москвичева Н. Л., Зиновьева Е. В., Костромина С. Н., Одинцова М. М., Зайцева Е. А. Феномен самодетерминации: психологические истоки и современное понимание. Ч. 1 // Новые психологические исследования. 2022. № 4. С. 90–116.

Осницкий А. К. Психологические механизмы самостоятельности. М.: Психологический ин-т РАО, 2010.

Почтарева Е. Ю. Психологическое содержание самодетерминации педагога // Общество и цивилизация. 2015. № 2. С. 80–84.

Расторгуева Е. Н. Самоактуализация: самодетерминация или самотрансценденция? (К проблеме личностного развития) // Мир психологии. 2017. № 1 (89). С. 194–203.

Рубинштейн С. Л. Принцип творческой самодеятельности // Ученые записки Высшей школы г. Одессы. 1922. Т. 11. С. 148–154.

Сергиенко Е. А. Проблема соотношения понятий субъекта и личности // Психологический журнал. 2013. № 34 (2). С. 5–16.

Слободчиков В. И. Психологические проблемы становления внутреннего мира человека // Вопросы психологии. 1986. № 6. С. 14–22.

Улыбина Е. В. Психология обыденного сознания. М.: Смысл, 2001.

Bandura A. Self-efficacy. The Exercise of Control. New York: W. H. Freeman, 1997.

Harre R. Personal Being. Oxford: Blackwell, 1983.

Ryan R. M., Deci E. L. Self-Determination Theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: The Guilford Press, 2017.


References

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy. The Exercise of Control. New York, W. H. Freeman.

Harre, R. (1983). Personal being. Oxford, Blackwell.

Kolotaev, V. A., Ulybina, E. V. (2012). A stage model of the development of the subject’s identity in a cultural and historical context (to the problem of the growth of self-determination in its implementation). Mir psixologii, 1 (69), 61–67. (In Russian)

Kostromina, S. N., Filatova, A. F., Moskvicheva, N. L., Zinovyeva, E. V., Odintsova, M. M. (2023). Complementary model of personality self-determination. Rossiiskii Psihologicheskii Zhurnal, 20 (1), 82–99. (In Russian)

Kozlova, Yu. V., Grishina, N. V. (2019). A changing personality in a changing world — discursive representations and representations of everyday consciousness: a comparative analysis. Psikhologiia lichnosti: Prebyvanie v izmenenii (pp. 185–220). Moscow, Smysl Publ. (In Russian)

Leontiev, D. A. (2000). Psychology of freedom: to the formulation of the problem of self-determination of personality. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 21 (1), 1–17. (In Russian)

Leontiev, D. A. (2011). Personal Potential: Structure and Diagnostics. Moscow, Smysl Publ. (In Russian)

Moskvicheva, N. L., Zinovyeva, E. V., Kostromina, S. N., Odintsova, M. M., Zaitseva, E. A. (2022). The phenomenon of self-determination: psychological origins and modern understanding. Part 1. Novye psikhologicheskie issledovaniia, 4, 90–116. https://doi.org/10.51217/npsyresearch_2022_02_04_05 (In Russian)

Osnitsky, A. K. (2010). Psychological Mechanisms of Independence. Moscow, Institute of Psychology of RAE Press. (In Russian)

Pochtareva E. U. (2015). The psychological content of the teacher’s self-determination. Obshchestvo i Civilizatsiia, 2, 80–84. (In Russian)

Rastorgueva, E. N. (2017). Self-actualization: self-determination or self-transcendence? (To the problem of personal development). Mir Psikhologii, 1, 194–203. (In Russian)

Rubinshtein, S. L. (1922). Printsip tvorcheskoi samodeiatel’nosti. Uchenye zapiski Vysshej shkoly g. Odessy, 11, 148–154. (In Russian)

Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York, The Guilford Press.

Sergienko, E. A. (2013). The problem of correlation between the concepts of subject and personality. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 34 (2), 5–16. (In Russian)

Slobodchikov, V. I. (1986). Psychological problems of the formation of the inner world of man. Voprosy Psikhologii, 6, 14–22. (In Russian)

Ulybina, E. V. (2001). Psychology of Everyday Consciousness. Moscow, Smysl Publ. (In Russian)

Zinovyeva, E. V., Kostromina, S. N. (2022). Experience integration: Between the past and the future. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology, 12 (2), 186–203. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2022.207 (In Russian)

Downloads

Published

2023-09-05

How to Cite

Odintsova, M., Moskvicheva, N., Kostromina, S., & Zinovyeva, E. (2023). Ordinary ideas about self-determination of personality: Structure and phenomenology. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology, 13(3), 362–374. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2023.305

Issue

Vol. 13 No. 3 (2023)

Section

Empirical and Experimental Research

License

Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.