Problems and research prospects on learning of new words: Fast mapping vs explicit encoding
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2022.409Abstract
This article reviews the problem of finding the most efficient strategy for new word acquisition. The authors analyse studies aimed at finding the differences between two learning strategies: fast mapping (FM), which is based on deduction and deriving meaning from context, and explicit encoding (EE), which implies learning new information through explicit instruction. While behavioural findings on these strategies’ efficiency (in terms of new word acquisition) are controversial, neurophysiological studies proved the existence of different neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the two strategies. The authors deem it necessary to shift focus of FM — EE differences research from comparing the efficiency of new word acquisition onto analysing of the two strategies’ additional characteristics, such as sensitivity to interference, speed of lexical and semantic integration of new words, memory consolidation during sleep. A new approach to explaining the differences between FM and EE is offered. It suggests a comparison of the two learning strategies’ mechanisms to neural mechanisms of the visual perception system — according to ascending and descending pathways of hierarchy (bottom-up and top-down signals into cortical activities). In particular, the authors suppose that FM activates bottom-up information processing, whereas EE activates top-down information processing. Future perspectives of research on this subject are discussed, such as exploring the effects of object or phenomena labelling on language learning occurring through FM or EE. The authors claim that it is important to conduct such studies with the use of an eye tracker in order to test the aforementioned suggestion about mechanisms, underlying learning strategies, and explaining the differences between them in terms of efficiency of language learning.
Keywords:
explicit encoding, fast mapping, language acquisition, new word learning, labelling, ascending and descending pathways of hierarchy in the visual perception system
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Литература
Веккер Л. М. Психика и реальность: единая теория психических процессов. М.: Смысл, 1998.
Выготский Л. В. Мышление и речь: психологические исследования. М.: Национальное образование, 2019.
Гончаров О. А., Князев Н. Н. Лингвистическая детерминация восприятия цветов у русских и коми // Психологический журнал Международного университета природы, общества и человека «Дубна». 2010. № 2. URL: https://psyanima.su/journal/2010/2/2010n2a1/2010n2a1.pdf (дата обращения: 04.06.2022).
Елисеева М. Б., Вершинина Е. А. Гендерные особенности речевого и коммуникативного развития детей 8–18 месяцев (на материале русского языка) // Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Труды института лингвистических исследований. 2017. № 13 (3). С. 680–708.
Котов А. А., Богачева Е. В., Власова Е. Ф. Обобщение значений новых слов у детей 4–6 лет на основе динамических признаков // Экспериментальная психология. 2012а. № 5 (1). С. 107–118.
Котов А. А., Котова Т. Н., Власова Е. Ф., Агрба Л. Б. Эффект интенции значения: как простое присутствие слова активирует категоризацию // Вопросы психолингвистики. 2012б. № 2 (16). С. 136–144.
Котов А. А., Котова Т. Н. Произношение имен объектов и категориальный эффект восприятия // Психология: журнал Высшей школы экономики. 2013. № 3 (10). 2013. С. 75–85.
Пиаже Ж. Речь и мышление ребенка. М.: Педагогика, 1994.
Уорф Б. Л. Отношения норм поведения и мышления к языку // Новое в лингвистике / под ред. В. А. Звегинцева. М.: Изд-во иностранной литературы, 1960. С. 157–201.
Щербакова О. В., Кирсанов А. С. Филиппова М. Г. Перикова Е. И., Благовещенский Е. Д., Штыров Ю. Ю. Эксплицитное и имплицитное усвоение новых слов: поведенческие корреляты и нейрофизиологические механизмы // Щербакова О. В. От слова — к репрезентации. Нейрокогнитивные основы вербального научения. СПб.: Скифия-принт, 2022. С. 22–96.
Atir-Sharon T., Gilboa A., Hazan H., Koilis E., Manevitz L. M. Decoding the formation of new semantics: MVPA investigation of rapid neocortical plasticity during associative encoding through fast mapping // Neural Plasticity. 2015. Article ID 804385. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/804385
Biederman I., Rabinowitz J. C., Glass A. L., Stacy E. W. On the information extracted from a glance at a scene // Journal of experimental psychology. 1974. Vol. 103 (3). P. 597–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037158
Brady K. W., Goodman J. C. The type, but not the amount, of information available influences toddlers’ fast mapping and retention of new words // American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 2014. Vol. 23 (2). P. 120–133. https://doi.org/10.1044/2013_AJSLP-13-0013
Carey S., Bartlett E. Acquiring a single new word // Papers and Reports on Child Language Development. 1978. Vol. 15. P. 17–29.
Cooper E., Greve A., Henson R. N. Investigating fast mapping task components: No evidence for the role of semantic referent nor semantic inference in healthy adults // Frontiers in Psychology. 2019. Vol. 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00394
Corballis M. The evolution of language // Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2009. Vol. 1156. Iss. 1. P. 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04423.x
Coutanche M. N., Thompson-Schill S. L. Fast mapping rapidly integrates information into existing memory networks // Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2014. Vol. 143 (6). P. 2296–2303. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000020
Davis M. H., Gaskell M. G. A complementary systems account of word learning: Neural and behavioural evidence // Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2009. Vol. 364 (1536). P. 3773–3800. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0111
Dils A. T., Boroditsky L. Visual motion aftereffect from understanding motion language // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2010. Vol. 107. P. 16396–16400. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1009438107
Fennell C. T., Waxman S. R. What paradox? Referential cues allow for infant use of phonetic detail in word learning // Child Development. 2010. Vol. 81 (5). P. 1376–1383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01479.x
Gilboa A. Long-term fragility: Interference susceptibility may be an inherent characteristic of memory traces acquired through fast mapping // Cognitive Neuroscience. 2019. Vol. 10 (4). P. 218–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2019.1593122
Greve A., Cooper E., Henson R. N. No evidence that ‘fast-mapping’ benefits novel learning in healthy older adults // Neuropsychologia. 2014. Vol. 60. P. 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.05.011
Halberda J. Is this a dax which I see before me? Use of the logical argument disjunctive syllogism supports word-learning in children and adults // Cognitive psychology. 2006. Vol. 53 (4). P. 310–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.04.003
Himmer L., Müller E., Gais S., Schönauer M. Sleep-mediated memory consolidation depends on the level of integration at encoding // Neurobiology of Learning and Memory. 2017. Vol. 137. P. 101–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2016.11.019
Hochstein S., Ahissar M. View from the top: Hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system // Neuron. 2002. Vol. 36 (5). P. 791–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0896-6273(02)01091-7
Kahneman D., Treisman A. Changing views of attention and automaticity // Varieties of attention / R. Parasuraman, R. Davies (eds). Orlando: Academic Press. 1984. P. 29–61.
Kalashnikova M., Escudero P., Kidd E. The development of fast‐mapping and novel word retention strategies in monolingual and bilingual infants // Developmental Science. 2018. Vol. 21 (6). P. e12674. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12674
Kaminski J., Call J., Fischer J. Word learning in a domestic dog: Evidence for “fast mapping” // Science. 2004. Vol. 304 (5677). P. 1682–1683. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1097859
Konopak B., Sheard C., Longman D., Lyman B., Slaton E., Atkinson R., Thames D. Incidental versus intentional word learning from context // Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly. 1987. Vol. 8 (1). P. 7–21.
Li C., Hu Z., Yang J. Rapid acquisition through fast mapping: stable memory over time and role of prior knowledge // Learning and Memory. 2020. Vol. 27 (5). P. 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.050138.119
Lupyan G. From chair to “chair”: a representational shift account of object labeling effects on memory // Journal of experimental psychology. General. 2008a. Vol. 137. P. 348–369. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.348
Lupyan G. Linguistically modulated perception and cognition: the label-feedback hypothesis // Frontiers in Psychology. 2012. Vol. 3. P. 54. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00054
Lupyan G., Rakison D. H., McClelland J. L. Language is not just for talking: Labels facilitate learning of novel categories // Psychological Science. 2007. Vol. 18. P. 1077–1082. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02028.x
Lupyan G. The conceptual grouping effect: Categories matter (and named categories matter more) // Cognition. 2008b. Vol. 108. P. 566–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.03.009
Lupyan G., Ward E. J. Language can boost otherwise unseen objects into visual awareness // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2013. Vol. 110 (35). P. 14196–14201. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1303312110
Maier M., Rahman R. A. Native language promotes access to visual consciousness // Psychological Science. 2018. Vol. 29 (11). P. 1757–1772. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618782181
May C. P., Hasher L., Foong N. Implicit memory, age, and time of day: Paradoxical priming effects // Psychological Science. 2005. Vol. 16 (2). P. 96–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00788.x
Merhav M., Karni A., Gilboa A. Neocortical catastrophic interference in healthy and amnesic adults: A paradoxical matter of time // Hippocampus. 2014. Vol. 24 (12). P. 1653–1662. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.22353
Meteyard L., Bahrami B., Vigliocco G. Motion detection and motion verbs: Language affects low-level visual perception // Psychological Science. 2007. Vol. 18. P. 1007–1013. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02016.x
Morozov M. I. How the strength of the link between an object and its category label influences visual search performance // The Russian Journal of Cognitive Science. 2017. Vol. 4 (4). P. 22–28.
Munro N., Baker E., McGregor K., Docking K., Arciuli J. Why word learning is not fast // Frontiers in Psychology. 2012. Vol. 3. P. 41. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00041
Navon D. Forest before trees // Cognitive Psychology. 1977. Vol. 9. P. 353–383.
Norman K. A., O’Reilly R. C. Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory: A complementary-learning-systems approach // Psychological Review. 2003. Vol. 10. P. 611–646. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.4.611
Norman D., Rumelhart D. E. Explorations in cognition. San Francisco: Freeman, 1975.
Oliva A., Torralba A. Modeling the shape of the scene: a holistic representation of the spatial envelope // International Journal of Computer Vision. 2001. Vol. 42 (3). P. 145–175. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011139631724
Perikova E., Blagovechtchenski E., Filippova M., Shcherbakova O., Kirsanov A., Shtyrov Y. Anodal tDCS over Broca’s area improves fast mapping and explicit encoding of novel vocabulary // Neuropsychologia. 2022. Vol. 168. P. 108156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108156
Roberson D., Hanley J. R., Pak H. S. Thresholds for colour discrimination in English and Korean speakers // Cognition. 2009. Vol. 112 (3). P. 482–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.06.008
Schmidt C., Collette F., Cajochen C., Peigneux P. A time to think: circadian rhythms in human cognition // Cognitive Neuropsychology. 2007. Vol. 24 (7). P. 755–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290701754158
Sharon T., Moscovitch M., Gilboa A. Rapid neocortical acquisition of long-term arbitrary associations independent of the hippocampus // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2011. Vol. 108 (3). P. 1146–1151. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1005238108
Schooler J. W., Engstler-Schooler T. Y. Verbal overshadowing of visual memories: Some things are better left unsaid // Cognitive Psychology. 1990. Vol. 22. P. 36–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(90)90003-M
Shtyrov Y., Filippova M., Blagovechtchenski E., Kirsanov A., Nikiforova E., Shcherbakova O. Electrophysiological evidence of dissociation between explicit encoding and fast mapping of novel spoken words // Frontiers in Psychology. 2021. Vol. 12. P. 571673. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.571673
Shtyrov Y., Filippova M., Perikova E., Kirsanov A., Shcherbakova O., Blagovechtchenski E. Explicit encoding vs. fast mapping of novel spoken words: Electrophysiological and behavioural evidence of diverging mechanisms // Neuropsychologia. 2022. Vol. 172. P. 108268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsycholo-gia.2022.108268
Shtyrov Y., Kirsanov A., Shcherbakova O. Explicitly slow, implicitly fast, or the other way around? Brain mechanisms for word acquisition // Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2019. Vol. 13. P. 116. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00116
Smith C. N., Urgolites Z. J., Hopkins R. O., Squire L. R. Comparison of explicit and incidental learning strategies in memory-impaired patients // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2014. Vol. 111 (1). P. 475–479. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1322263111
Snodgrass J. G., Corwin J. Perceptual identification thresholds for 150 fragmented pictures from the Snodgrass and Vanderwart picture set // Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1988. Vol. 67 (1). P. 3–36. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1988.67.1.3
Souza A. S., Overkott C., Matyja M. Categorical distinctiveness constrains the labeling benefit in visual working memory // Journal of Memory and Language. 2021. Vol. 119. P. 104242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2021.104242
Thierry G., Athanasopoulos P., Wiggett A., Dering B., Kuipers J.-R. Unconscious effects of language-specific terminology on preattentive color perception // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2009. Vol. 106. P. 4567–4570. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0811155106
Ting Siok W., Kay P., Wang W. S. Y., Chan A. H. D., Chen L., Luke K.-K., Hai Tan L. Language regions of brain are operative in color perception // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2009. Vol. 106 (20). P. 8140–8145. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903627106
Warren D. E., Duff M. C. Not so fast: Hippocampal amnesia slows word learning despite successful fast mapping // Hippocampus. 2014. Vol. 24 (8). P. 920–953. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.22279
Warren D. E., Tranel D., Duff M. C. Impaired acquisition of new words after left temporal lobectomy despite normal fast-mapping behavior // Neuropsychologia. 2016. Vol. 80. P. 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.11.016
Winawer J., Witthoft N., Frank M. C., Wu L., Wade A. R., Boroditsky L. Russian blues reveal effects of language on color discrimination // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. 2007. Vol. 104 (19). P. 7780–7785. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701644104
Zaiser A. K., Bader R., Meyer P. High feature overlap reveals the importance of anterior and medial temporal lobe structures for learning by means of fast mapping // Cortex. 2022а. Vol. 146. P. 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2021.07.017
Zaiser A. K., Meyer P., Bader R. High feature overlap and incidental encoding drive rapid semantic integration in the fast mapping paradigm // Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2022b. Vol. 151 (1). P. 97–120. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001070
References
Atir-Sharon, T., Gilboa, A., Hazan, H., Koilis, E., Manevitz, L. M. (2015). Decoding the formation of new semantics: MVPA investigation of rapid neocortical plasticity during associative encoding through fast mapping. Neural Plastisity, 804385. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/804385
Biederman, I., Rabinowitz, J. C., Glass, A. L., Stacy, E. W. (1974). On the information extracted from a glance at a scene. Journal of experimental psychology, 103 (3), 597–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037158
Brady, K. W., Goodman, J. C. (2014). The type, but not the amount, of information available influences toddlers’ fast mapping and retention of new words. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 23 (2), 120–133. https://doi.org/10.1044/2013_AJSLP-13-0013
Carey, S., Bartlett, E. (1978). Acquiring a single new word. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 15, 17–29.
Cooper, E., Greve, A., Henson, R. N. (2019). Investigating fast mapping task components: No evidence for the role of semantic referent nor semantic inference in healthy adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00394
Corballis, M. (2009). The evolution of language. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1156, 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04423.x
Coutanche, M. N., Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2014). Fast mapping rapidly integrates information into existing memory networks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143 (6), 2296–2303. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000020
Davis, M. H., Gaskell, M. G. (2009). A complementary systems account of word learning: Neural and behavioural evidence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364 (1536), 3773–3800. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0111
Dils, A. T., Boroditsky, L. (2010). Visual motion aftereffect from understanding motion language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 16396–16400. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1009438107
Eliseeva, M. B., Vershinina, E. A. (2017). Gender features of speech and communicative development of children aged 8–18 months (based on the material of the Russian language). Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Trudy instituta lingvisticheskikh issledovanii, 13 (3), 680–708. (In Russian)
Fennell, C. T., Waxman, S. R. (2010). What paradox? Referential cues allow for infant use of phonetic detail in word learning. Child Development, 81 (5), 1376–1383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01479.x
Gilboa, A. (2019). Long-term fragility: Interference susceptibility may be an inherent characteristic of memory traces acquired through fast mapping. Cognitive Neuroscience, 10 (4), 218–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2019.1593122
Goncharov, O. A., Knyazev, N. N. (2010). Linguistic determination of color perception in Russians and Komi. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal Mezhdunarodnogo universiteta prirody, obshchestva i cheloveka “Dubna”, 2. Available at: https://psyanima.su/journal/2010/2/2010n2a1/2010n2a1.pdf (accessed: 04.06.2022).
(In Russian)
Greve, A., Cooper, E., Henson, R. N. (2014). No evidence that ‘fast-mapping’ benefits novel learning in healthy older adults. Neuropsychologia, 60, 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.05.011
Halberda, J. (2006). Is this a dax which I see before me? Use of the logical argument disjunctive syllogism supports word-learning in children and adults. Cognitive psychology, 53 (4), 310–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.04.003
Himmer, L., Müller, E., Gais, S., Schönauer, M. (2017). Sleep-mediated memory consolidation depends on the level of integration at encoding. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 137, 101–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2016.11.019
Hochstein, S., Ahissar, M. (2002). View from the top: Hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system. Neuron, 36 (5), 791–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0896-6273(02)01091-7
Kahneman, D., Treisman, A. (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In: Parasuraman R., Davies R. (eds). Varieties of attention (pp. 29–61). Orlando, Academic Press.
Kalashnikova, M., Escudero, P., Kidd, E. (2018). The development of fast‐mapping and novel word retention strategies in monolingual and bilingual infants. Developmental Science, 21 (6), e12674. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12674
Kaminski, J., Call, J., Fischer, J. (2004). Word learning in a domestic dog: Evidence for “fast mapping”. Science, 304 (5677), 1682–1683. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1097859
Konopak, B., Sheard, C., Longman, D., Lyman, B., Slaton, E., Atkinson, R., Thames, D. (1987). Incidental versus intentional word learning from context. Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly, 8 (1), 7–21.
Kotov, A. A., Bogacheva, E. V., Vlasova, E. F. (2012а). Generalization of the meanings of new words by 4–6 year old children on the basis of dynamic features. Eksperimental’naia psikhologiia, 5 (1), 107–118. (In Russian)
Kotov, A. А., Kotova, T. N., Vlasova, Е. F., Agrba, L. B. (2012b). The effect of the category intention: How the mere presence of a word activates categorization. Voprosy psikholingvistiki, 16, 136–144. (In Russian)
Kotov, A. А., Kotova, T. N. (2013). Object name pronunciation and the categorizing effect of perception. Psikhologiia: zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 3 (10), 75–85. (In Russian)
Li, C., Hu, Z., Yang, J. (2020). Rapid acquisition through fast mapping: stable memory over time and role of prior knowledge. Learning and Memory, 27 (5), 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.050138.119
Lupyan, G. (2008a). From chair to “chair”: a representational shift account of object labeling effects on memory. Journal of experimental psychology. General, 137, 348–369. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.348
Lupyan, G. (2008b). The conceptual grouping effect: Categories matter (and named categories matter more). Cognition, 108, 566–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.03.009
Lupyan, G. (2012). Linguistically modulated perception and cognition: the label-feedback hypothesis. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 54. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00054
Lupyan, G., Rakison, D. H., McClelland, J. L. (2007). Language is not just for talking: Labels facilitate learning of novel categories. Psychological Science, 18, 1077–1082. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02028.x
Lupyan, G., Ward, E. J. (2013). Language can boost otherwise unseen objects into visual awareness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110 (35), 14196–14201. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1303312110
Maier, M., Rahman, R. A. (2018). Native language promotes access to visual consciousness. Psychological Science, 29 (11), 1757–1772 https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618782181
May, C. P., Hasher, L., Foong, N. (2005). Implicit memory, age, and time of day: paradoxical priming effects. Psychological Science, 16 (2), 96–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00788.x
Merhav, M., Karni, A., Gilboa, A. (2014). Neocortical catastrophic interference in healthy and amnesic adults: A paradoxical matter of time. Hippocampus, 24 (12), 1653–1662. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.22353
Meteyard, L., Bahrami, B., Vigliocco, G. (2007). Motion detection and motion verbs: Language affects low-level visual perception. Psychological Science, 18, 1007–1013. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02016.x
Morozov, M. I. (2017). How the strength of the link between an object and its category label influences visual search performance. The Russian Journal of Cognitive Science, 4 (4), 22–28.
Munro, N., Baker, E., McGregor, K., Docking, K., Arciuli, J. (2012). Why word learning is not fast. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 41. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00041
Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353–383.
Norman, K. A., O’Reilly, R. C. (2003). Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory: A complementary-learning-systems approach. Psychological Review, 110, 611–646. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.4.611
Norman, D., Rumelhart, D. E. (1975). Explorations in cognition. San Francisco, Freeman.
Oliva, A., Torralba, A. (2001). Modeling the shape of the scene: a holistic representation of the spatial envelope. International Journal of Computer Vision, 42 (3), 145–175. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011139631724
Perikova, E., Blagovechtchenski, E., Filippova, M., Shcherbakova, O., Kirsanov, A., Shtyrov, Y. (2022). An-odal tDCS over Broca’s area improves fast mapping and explicit encoding of novel vocabulary. Neuropsychologia, 168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108156
Piaget, J. J. (1994). Speech and thinking of the child. Moscow, Pedagogika Publ. (In Russian)
Roberson, D., Hanley, J. R., Pak, H. S. (2009). Thresholds for colour discrimination in English and Korean speakers. Cognition, 112 (3), 482–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.06.008
Shcherbakova, O. V., Kirsanov, A. S., Filippova, M. G., Perikova, E. I., Blagovechtchenski, E. E., Shtyrov, Y. Y. (2022). Explicit and implicit acquisition of new words: behavioral correlates and neurophysiological mechanisms. In: O. V. Shcherbakova (ed.). From the word to representation. Neurocognitive underpinnings of verbal learning (pp. 22–96). St Petersburg, Skifiia-print Publ. (In Russian)
Schmidt, C., Collette, F., Cajochen, C., Peigneux, P. (2007). A time to think: circadian rhythms in human cognition. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 24 (7), 755–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290701754158
Sharon, T., Moscovitch, M., Gilboa, A. (2011). Rapid neocortical acquisition of long-term arbitrary associations independent of the hippocampus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108 (3), 1146–1151. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1005238108
Schooler, J. W., Engstler-Schooler, T. Y. (1990). Verbal overshadowing of visual memories: Some things are better left unsaid. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 36–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(90)90003-M
Shtyrov, Y., Filippova, M., Blagovechtchenski, E., Kirsanov, A., Nikiforova, E., Shcherbakova, O. (2021). Electrophysiological evidence of dissociation between explicit encoding and fast mapping of novel spoken words. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 571673. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.571673
Shtyrov, Y., Filippova, M., Perikova, E., Kirsanov, A., Shcherbakova, O., Blagovechtchenski, E. (2022). Explicit encoding vs. fast mapping of novel spoken words: Electrophysiological and behavioural evidence of diverging mechanisms. Neuropsychologia, 172, 108268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108268
Shtyrov, Y., Kirsanov, A., Shcherbakova, O. (2019). Explicitly slow, implicitly fast, or the other way around? Brain mechanisms for word acquisition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 13, 116. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00116
Smith, C. N., Urgolites, Z. J., Hopkins, R. O., Squire, L. R. (2014). Comparison of explicit and incidental learning strategies in memory-impaired patients. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111 (1), 475–479. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1322263111
Snodgrass, J. G., Corwin, J. (1988). Perceptual identification thresholds for 150 fragmented pictures from the Snodgrass and Vanderwart picture set. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 67 (1), 3–36. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1988.67.1.3
Souza, A. S., Overkott, C., Matyja, M. (2021). Categorical distinctiveness constrains the labeling benefit in visual working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 119, 104242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2021.104242
Thierry, G., Athanasopoulos, P., Wiggett, A., Dering, B., Kuipers, J.-R. (2009). Unconscious effects of language-specific terminology on preattentive color perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 4567–4570. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0811155106
Ting Siok, W., Kay, P., Wang, W. S. Y., Chan, A. H. D., Chen, L., Luke, K.-K., Hai Tan, L. (2009). Language regions of brain are operative in color perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106 (20), 8140–8145. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903627106
Vekker, L. M. (1998). Psyche and reality: a unified theory of mental processes. Moscow: Smysl Publ. (In Russian)
Vygotsky, L. V. (2019). Thinking and Speech: Psychological research. Moscow: Natsional’noe obrazovanie Publ. (In Russian)
Warren, D. E., Duff, M. C. (2014). Not so fast: Hippocampal amnesia slows word learning despite successful fast mapping. Hippocampus, 24 (8), 920–953. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.22279
Warren, D. E., Tranel, D., Duff, M. C. (2016). Impaired acquisition of new words after left temporal lobectomy despite normal fast-mapping behavior. Neuropsychologia, 80, 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.11.016
Whorf, B. L. (1960). The relation of habitual thought and behavior to language. In: V. A. Zvegintsev (ed.). Novoe v lingvistike (pp. 157–201). Moscow, Izd-vo inostrannoi literatury Publ. (In Russian)
Winawer, J., Witthoft, N., Frank, M. C., Wu, L., Wade, A. R., Boroditsky, L. (2007). Russian blues reveal effects of language on color discrimination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 104 (19), 7780–7785. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701644104
Zaiser, A. K., Bader, R., Meyer, P. (2022a). High feature overlap reveals the importance of anterior and medial temporal lobe structures for learning by means of fast mapping. Cortex, 146, 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2021.07.017
Zaiser, A. K., Meyer, P., Bader, R. (2022b). High feature overlap and incidental encoding drive rapid semantic integration in the fast mapping paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151 (1), 97–120. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001070
Downloads
Published
2022-12-14
How to Cite
Gnedykh, D., Filippova, M., Makarova, D., & Perikova, E. (2022). Problems and research prospects on learning of new words: Fast mapping vs explicit encoding. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology, 12(4), 527–543. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2022.409
Issue
Section
Theory and Methodology of Psychology
License
Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.
