Personality psychology and anthropological discourse: In search of new approaches
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2022.203Abstract
Modern anthropology is a cycle of disciplines that study a person in culture and are devoted to various aspects of human existence. At the same time, in international discourse, anthropolo- gy is most often understood today as sociocultural anthropologies. However, due to historical and political reasons, neither social, nor cultural, nor psychological anthropology appeared in Russia in the 20th century as institutionalized research directions, and the study of variations in personality development in a variety of cultures took place not so much in psychology as it was scattered in the interdisciplinary space of socio-humanitarian sciences. Today, this situation has not only repeatedly reflected disadvantages, but also less obvious advantages. Spontaneous transdisciplinarity is becoming an important resource in the social sciences, in- cluding psychology. Interacting research fields produce mixed methods and methodologies; cognitive focuses are shifting from traditional subjects of study to mobile research projects; from subject-oriented to problem-oriented research. Personality psychology, sociology of changes, anthropology of our time are included in the intellectual movement, comprehending the issues of how to study a person in a transitive society; how to investigate a personality in change; how to comprehend individuality in the transformations of everyday life, identity in the transformations of the global world. At the same time, responding to current challenges by searching for new approaches and methodologies, psychology, sociology and anthropology are collectively participating in the transformation of the model of cognition. It is suggested that in the current cognitive situation, anthropological discourse can serve as a source of re- newal and critical rethinking of psychological concepts, a space of possibilities in the develop- ment of personality psychology. Materials are presented that confirms this assumption.
Keywords:
methodology, personality psychology, anthropological approach, man and the world, modernity, transdisciplinarity
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Литература
Артемова О. Ю. Немного академической рефлексии // Этнографическое обозрение. 2020. № 2. С. 93– 101.
Асмолов А. Г. Психология личности. Культурно-историческое понимание развития человека. М.: Смысл, 2007.
Асмолов А. (ред.). Mobilis in mobili: личность в эпоху перемен. М.: ЯСК, 2018.
Асмолов А. Г., Галиев А. Сочтемся смыслами. Антропологические изыскания помогают развиваться русской школе. // Коммерсантъ — Наука. 2020. № 6, 24.03. С. 42. URL: https://www.kommersant. ru/doc/4292023 (дата обращения: 23.12.2021).
Асмолов А. Г., Солдатова Г. У. Искусство жить с непохожими людьми. М.: Московия, 2009.
Байбурин А. (ред.). Специальный выпуск к VI конгрессу этнографов и антропологов // Антрополо- гический форум. СПб.: Музей антропологии и этнографии им. Петра Великого (Кунсткамера) РАН, 2005. С. 6–220.
Бажанов В., Шольц Р. В. (ред.). Трансдисциплинарность в философии и науке: подходы, проблемы, перспективы. М.: Навигатор, 2015.
Бардиер Г. Л. Научные основы социальной психологии толерантности. СПб.: Невский институт языка и культуры; МИРС, 2007.
Братусь Б. С. К проблеме человека в психологии // Вопросы психологии. 1997. № 5. С. 3–19.
Гришина Н. В. Изменения жизненной ситуации: ситуационный подход // Психологические исследования. 2013. Т. 6, № 30. С. 3. https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v6i30.684
Гришина Н. В. Экзистенциальная психология в поисках своего вектора развития // Психологические исследования. 2015. Т. 8, № 42. С. 2. https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v8i42.529
Гришина Н. В. (ред.). Психология личности: Пребывание в изменении. СПб.: Изд-во С.-Петерб. ун- та, 2019.
Гришина Н. В., Костромина С. Н. Психология личности: переосмысление традиционных подходов в контексте вызовов современности // Психологические исследования. 2017. Т. 10, № 52. С. 1. https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v10i52.385
Гусельцева М. С. Принцип развития в современной психологии: вызовы полипарадигмальности и трансдисциплинарности // Разработка и реализация принципа развития в современной психологии / под ред. А. Л. Журавлева, Е. А. Сергиенко. М.: Ин-т психологии РАН, 2016. С. 31–51.
Гусельцева М. С. Психология повседневности: методология, история, перспективы // Психологиче- ские исследования. 2017. Т. 10, № 51. С. 12. https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v10i51.397
Гусельцева М. С. Антропология современности: человек и мир в потоке трансформаций: монография: в 3 ч. Ч. 1. М.: Акрополь, 2021a.
Гусельцева М. С. Проблема человека в российской психологии и за ее пределами // Вестник РГГУ. Сер. Психология. Педагогика. Образование. 2021б. № 2. С. 72–95.
Зинченко В. П. От классической к органической психологии // Вопросы психологии. 1996. № 5. С. 7–20.
Знаков В. В. Психология понимания мира человека. М.: Ин-т психологии РАН, 2016.
Знаков В. В. Психология возможного: Новое направление исследований понимания. М.: Ин-т психологии РАН, 2020.
Кожановский А. Н. Испанская антропология: «второе рождение» и трудности роста. Современная европейская социокультурная антропология и этнология. Историографические очерки / отв. ред. М. Ю. Мартынова. М.: Институт этнологии и антропологии РАН, 2018. С. 63–102.
Костромина С. Н., Гришина Н. В. Возникающее как предмет исследования в психологии личности // Вопросы психологии. 2021. № 4. С. 21–37
Леви-Стросс К. Узнавать других. Антропология и проблемы современности. М.: Текст, 2016.
Леонтьев Д. А. К дифференциальной антропологии // Наука и будущее: идеи, которые изменят мир: тез. докл. междунар. конф. Москва, 14–16 апреля 2004. М.: Наука и будущее, 2004. С. 107–109.
Леонтьев Д. А. К антропологии развлечений // Город развлечений: наблюдения, анализы, сюжеты / под ред. Е. В. Дукова. СПб.: Дмитрий Буланин, 2007. С. 62–68.
Леонтьев Д. А. Личность в непредсказуемом мире // Методология и история психологии. 2010. Т. 5. Вып. 3. С. 120–140.
Леонтьев Д. А. К антропологии счастья: состояние благополучия и путь радости // Человек. 2011. № 5. С. 34–46.
Леонтьев Д. А. К экзистенциальной антропологии // Седьмая Всероссийская научно-практическая конференция по экзистенциальной психологии: материалы сообщений / под ред. Д. А.Леонтьева, А. Х. Фам. М.: Смысл, 2019. С. 5–10.
Логинова Н. А. Проблема человека в современной российской психологии // Человек и мир. 2017. Т. 1, № 1. С. 81–110.
Марцинковская Т. Д. Современная психология — вызовы транзитивности // Психологические ис- следования. 2015. Т. 8, № 42. С. 1. https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v8i42.533
Марцинковская Т. Д. Психология повседневности: оксюморон или новый тренд психологии // Психологические исследования. 2017. Т. 10, № 56. С. 1. https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v10i56.340
Орлова Э. А. История антропологических учений. М.: Академический проект, 2010.
Пузырей А. А. Психология. Психотехника. Психагогика. М.: Смысл, 2005.
Сергиенко Е. А. Психическое развитие с позиций системно-субъектного подхода. М.: Ин-т психологии РАН, 2021.
Скрипкина Т. П. Психология толерантности. М.: ФИРО, 2013.
Соколовский С. В. Российская антропология и проблемы ее историографии // Антропологический форум. 2008. № 9. С. 123–153.
Хорошилов Д. А. Психология социального познания в изменяющемся обществе. М.: Акрополь, 2022.
Barnes J. A. Class and committees in a Norwegian Island Parish // Human Relations. 1954. Vol. 7. Р. 39–58. URL: https://pierremerckle.fr/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Barnes.pdf (дата обращения: 25.12.2021).
Barnes J. A. Models and Interpretations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
Barth F. The analysis of culture in complex societies // Ethnos. 1989. No. 54. P. 120–142.
Bringa T., Bendixsen S. (eds). Engaged Anthropology: Views from Scandinavia. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.
Bryant R., Knight D. M. The Anthropology of the Future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
Eriksen Т. Н. Creolization and creativity // Global Networks. 2003. Vol. 3 (3). Р. 223–237.
Eriksen Т. Н. Creolization in Anthropological Theory and in Mauritius // Creolization: History, Ethnography, Theory / ed. Stewart Ch. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press, 2007. Р. 154–177.
Eriksen Т. Н. Engaging Anthropology: The Case for a Public Presence. Oxford: Berg Publishers, 2006.
Eriksen Т. Н. Small Places, Large Issues. An Introduction to Social and Cultural Anthropology. 4th ed. London: Pluto Press, 2015.
Eriksen T. H., Garsten C., Randeria S. (eds). Anthropology Now and Next. Essays in Honor of Ulf Hannerz. Brooklyn: Berghahn Books, 2015.
Eriksen Т. Н., Nielsen F. S. A History of Anthropology. London: Pluto Press, 2013.
Hannerz U. Cultural Complexity. New York: Columbia University Press, 1992.
Hannerz U. Flows, boundaries and hybrids: Keywords in transnational anthropology // Mana (Rio de Janeiro). 1997. Vol. 3 (1). Р. 7–39.
Hannerz U. Anthropology’s World: Life in a Twenty-first-century Discipline. London: Pluto Press, 2010.
Hannerz U. Writing Future Worlds: An Anthropologist Explores Global Scenarios. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.
Kapferer B. Situations, crisis, and the anthropology of the concrete: The contribution of Max Gluckman // Social Analysis. 2005. Vol. 49 (3). Р. 85–122. https://doi.org/10.3167/015597705780275110
Markham A. N. Remix culture, remix methods: Reframing qualitative inquiry for social media contexts // Global Dimensions of Qualitative Inquiry / eds N. Denzin, M. Giardina. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press, 2013. P. 63–81.
Markham A. N. Remix as a literacy for future anthropology practice // Anthropologies and Futures: Researching Emerging and Uncertain Worlds / eds J. F. Salazar, S. Pink, A. Irving, J. Sjöberg. London: Bloomsbury, 2017. P. 225–242.
Рink S., Salazar J. F. Anthropology and futures: Setting the agenda // Anthropologies and Futures: Research- ing Emerging and Uncertain Worlds / eds J. F. Salazar, S. Pink, A. Irving, J. Sjöberg. London: Bloomsbury, 2017. Р. 3–22.
Rabinow P., Marcus G. E., Faubion J. D., Rees T. Designs for an Anthropology of the Contemporary. Durham: Duke University Press, 2008.
Rees T. After Ethnos. Durham; London: Duke University Press, 2018.
Rees T. From the anthropocene to the microbiocene. The novel coronavirus compels us to rethink the modern concept of the political // Noema Magazine. 2020. June 10. URL: https://www.noemamag.com/ from-the-anthropocene-to-the-microbiocene/ (дата обращения: 21.07.2021).
Riegel K. F., Meacham J. A. The Developing Individual in a Changing World. Vol. I: Historical and Cultural Issues. London: Routledge, 2007.
van Lange P. A. M. (ed.). Bridging Social Psychology: Benefits of Transdisciplinary Approaches. Mahwah: Erlbaum, 2006.
Vertovec S. Super-Diversity and its implications // Ethnic and Racial Studies. 2007. Vol. 30 (6). P. 1024–1053.
Vertovec S. (ed.). Routledge International Handbook of Diversity Studies. New York: Routledge, 2014.
References
Artemova, O. Yu. (2020). A bit of academic reflection. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie, 2, 93–101. (In Russian)
Asmolov, A. G. (2007). Psychology of Personality. Cultural-historical understanding of human development. Moscow, Smysl Publ. (In Russian)
Asmolov, A. (ed.) (2018). Mobilis in mobili: personality in an era of change. Moscow, YaSK Publ. (In Russian) )
Asmolov, A. G., Galiev, A. (2020). Let’s consider meanings. Anthropological research helps to develop the Russian school. Kommersant” — Nauka, 6, 42. Available at: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4292023(accessed: 23.12.2021). (In Russian) )
Asmolov, A. G., Soldatova, G. U. (2009). The art of living with different people. Moscow, Moskoviia Publ. (In Russian)
Baiburin, A. (ed.) (2005). Special issue for the VI Congress of Ethnographers and Anthropologists. Antropologicheskii forum. St Petersburg: Muzei antropologii i etnografii im. Petra Velikogo (Kunstkamera) RAN Press, 6–220. (In Russian)
Bardier, G. L. (2007). Scientific bases of social psychology of tolerance. St Petersburg: Nevskii institut iazyka i kul’tury Press; MIRS Press. (In Russian)
Barnes, J. A. (1954). Class and committees in a Norwegian Island Parish. Human Relations, 7, 39–58. Available at: https://pierremerckle.fr/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Barnes.pdf (accessed: 25.12.2021).
Barnes, J. A. (1990). Models and Interpretations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ).
Barth, F. (1989). The Analysis of Culture in Complex Societies. Ethnos, 54, 120–142.
Bazhanov, V., Shol’ts, R. V. (eds) (2015). Transdisciplinarity in philosophy and science: approaches, problems, prospects. Moscow, Navigator Publ. (In Russian)
Bratus’, B. S. (1997). On the problem of man in psychology. Voprosy psikhologii, 5, 3–19. (In Russian)
Bringa, T., Bendixsen, S. (eds) (2016). Engaged Anthropology: Views from Scandinavia. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bryant, R., Knight, D. M. (2019). The Anthropology of the Future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. )
Eriksen, Т. Н. (2003). Creolization and creativity. Global Networks, 3 (3), 223–237.
Eriksen, Т. Н. (2007). Creolization in Anthropological Theory and in Mauritius. In: Stewart Ch. (ed.).
Creolization: History, Ethnography, Theory. (рр. 154–177). Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.
Eriksen, Т. Н. (2006). Engaging Anthropology: The Case for a Public Presence. Oxford: Berg Publishers.
Eriksen, Т. Н. (2015). Small Places, Large Issues. An Introduction to Social and Cultural Anthropology. London: Pluto Press.
Eriksen, T. H., Garsten, C., Randeria, S. (eds) (2015). Anthropology Now and Next. Essays in Honor of Ulf Hannerz. Brooklyn: Berghahn Books.
Eriksen, Т. Н., Nielsen, F. S. (2013). A History of Anthropology. London: Pluto Press. Hannerz, U. (1992). Cultural Complexity. New York: Columbia University Press.
Hannerz, U. (1997). Flows, Boundaries and Hybrids: Keywords in Transnational Anthropology. Mana (Rio de Janeiro) , 3 (1), 7–39.
Hannerz, U. (2010). Anthropology’s World: Life in a Twenty-first-century Discipline. London: Pluto Press.
Hannerz, U. (2016). Writing Future Worlds: An Anthropologist Explores Global Scenarios. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Grishina, N. V. (2013). Changes of life situation: situational approach. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniia, 6 (30), 3. https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v6i30.684 (In Russian)
Grishina, N. V. (2015). Existential psychology in search of development vector. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniia, 8 (42), 2. https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v8i42.529 (In Russian)
Grishina, N. V. (ed.). (2019). Psychology of personality: Staying in change. St Petersburg: St Peterburg University Press. (In Russian)
Grishina, N. V., Kostromina, S. N. (2017). Personality psychology: rethinking traditional approaches in context challenges of modern reality. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniia, 10 (52), 1. https://doi. org/10.54359/ps.v10i52.385 (In Russian)
Gusel’tseva, M. S. (2016). The principle of development in modern psychology: challenges of polyparadigmality and transdisciplinarity. In: Zhuravlev, A. L., Sergienko E. A. (eds). Development and implementation of the principle of development in modern psychology (рр. 31–51). Moscow, Institute of Psychology RAS Press. (In Russian)
Gusel’tseva, M. S. (2017). Everyday life psychology: methodology, history and perspectives. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniia, 10 (51), 12. https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v10i51.397 (In Russian)
Gusel’tseva, M. S. (2021a). Anthropology of modernity: man and the world in the stream of transformations. Monograph: in 3 parts. Part 1. Moscow, Akropol’ Publ. (In Russian)
Gusel’tseva, M. S. (2021b). The problem of man in Russian psychology and beyond. Vestnik RGGU. Ser. Psikhologiia. Pedagogika. Obrazovanie, 2, 72–95. (In Russian)
Kapferer, B. (2005). Situations, Crisis, and the Anthropology of the Concrete: The Contribution of Max Gluckman. Social Analysis, 49 (3), 85–122. https://doi.org/10.3167/015597705780275110
Khoroshilov, D. A. (2022). Psychology of social cognition in a changing society. Moscow, Akropol’ Publ. (In Russian)
Kostromina, S. N., Grishina, N. V. (2021). Emerging as a subject of research in personality psychology. Voprosy psikhologii, 4, 21–37. (In Russian)
Kozhanovskii, A. N. (2018). Spanish Anthropology: “Rebirth” and the Difficulties of Growth, In: Martynova M. Yu. (ed.). Modern European socio-cultural anthropology and ethnology. Historiographical essays
(рр. 63–102). Moscow, Institute of Anthropology and Ethnography RAS Press. (In Russian)
Lévi-Strauss, C. (2016). Knowing others. Anthropology and contemporary problems. Moscow, Tekst Publ. (In Russian)
Leont’ev, D. A. (2004). Towards differential anthropology. In: Nauka i budushchee: idei, kotorye izmeniat mir: tez. dokl. mezhdunar. konf. Moskva, 14–16 aprelia 2004 (рр. 107–109). Moscow. (In Russian)
Leont’ev, D. A. (2007). Anthropology of entertainment. In: Dukov E. V. (ed.). City of Entertainment: Observations. Analyses. Stories (рр. 62–68). St Petersburg: Dmitriy Bulanin Publ. (In Russian)
Leont’ev, D. A. (2010). Personality in an unpredictable world. Metodologiia i istoriia psikhologii, 5 (3), 120–140. (In Russian)
Leont’ev, D. A. (2011). Anthropology of happiness: The state of well-being and the way of joy. Chelovek, 5, 34–46. (In Russian)
Leont’ev, D. A. (2019). On existential anthropology. In: Leont’ev D. A., Fam A. Kh. (eds). Sed’maia Vserossiiskaia nauchno-prakticheskaia konferentsyia po ekzistentsial’noi psikhologii: Materialy soobshchenii (рр. 5–10). Moscow, Smysl Publ. (In Russian)
Loginova, N. A. (2017). Problem of man in modern Russian. Chelovek i mir, 1 (1), 81–110. (In Russian)
Markham, A. N. (2013) Remix culture, remix methods: Reframing qualitative inquiry for social media contexts. In: Denzin N., Giardina M. (eds). Global Dimensions of Qualitative Inquiry (рр. 63–81). Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.
Markham, A. N. (2017). Remix as a literacy for future anthropology practice. In: Salazar J. F., Pink S., Irving A., Sjöberg J. (eds). Anthropologies and Futures: Researching Emerging and Uncertain Worlds (рр. 225– 242). London: Bloomsbury.
Martsinkovskaya, T. D. (2015). Modern psychology — challenges of transitivity. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya, 8 (42), 1. https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v8i42.533 (In Russian)
Martsinkovskaya, T. D. (2017). Psychology of everyday life: an oxymoron or a new trend in psychology. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya, 10 (56), 1. https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v10i56.340 (In Russian)
Orlova, E. A. (2010). History of anthropological doctrines. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt Publ. (In Russian)
Рink, S., Salazar, J. F. (2017). Anthropology and futures: Setting the agenda. In: Salazar J. F., Pink S., Irving A., Sjöberg J. (eds). Anthropologies and Futures: Researching Emerging and Uncertain Worlds (рр. 3–22). London: Bloomsbury.
Puzyrei, A. A. (2005). Psychology. Psychotechnics. Psychology. Moscow, Smysl Publ. (In Russian)
Rabinow, P., Marcus, G. E., Faubion, J. D., Rees T. (2008). Designs for an Anthropology of the Contemporary. Durham: Duke University Press.
Rees, T. (2018). After Ethnos. Durham; London: Duke University Press.
Rees, T. (2020). From the anthropocene to the microbiocene. The novel coronavirus compels us to rethink the modern concept of the political. Noema Magazine. June 10. Available at: https://www.noemamag.com/from-the-anthropocene-to-the-microbiocene/ (accessed: 21.07.2021).
Riegel, K. F., Meacham, J. A. (2007). The Developing Individual in a Changing World. Vol. I: Historical and Cultural Issues. London: Routledge.
Sergienko, E. A. (2021). Mental development from the standpoint of the system-subject approach. Moscow, Institute of Psychology RAS Press. (In Russian).
Skripkina, T. P. (2013). Psychology of tolerance. Moscow, FIRO Publ. (In Russian)
Sokolovskii, S. V. (2008). Russian anthropology and problems of its historiography. Antropologicheskii forum, 9, 123–153. (In Russian)
van Lange, P. A. M. (ed.) (2006). Bridging Social Psychology: Benefits of Transdisciplinary Approaches. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Vertovec, S. (2007). Super-Diversity and Its Implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30 (6), 1024–1053. Vertovec, S. (ed.) (2014). Routledge International Handbook of Diversity Studies. New York: Routledge.
Zinchenko, V. P. (1996). From classical to organic psychology. Voprosy psikhologii, 5, 7–20. (In Russian)
Znakov, V. V. (2020). Psychology of Possible: A New Direction for Research in Understanding. Moscow, Institute of Psychology RAS Press. (In Russian)
Znakov, V. V. (2016). Psychology of understanding the human world. Moscow, Institute of Psychology RAS Press. (In Russian)
Downloads
Published
2022-07-08
How to Cite
Guseltseva, M. (2022). Personality psychology and anthropological discourse: In search of new approaches. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology, 12(2), 132–149. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2022.203
Issue
Section
Theory and Methodology of Psychology
License
Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.
