Proactive safety management and proactive behavior of personnel as resources of Resilience Engineering
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2020.103Abstract
The article substantiates the relevance of ensuring the technosphere safety of socio-technical systems based on proactive management and proactive working behavior. The development of ideas about the role of the human factor in solving the problem of integrated adaptive safety of socio-technical systems is described. Modern organizations should be able to adapt to work in an unpredictable social, political and climatic environment, with the likelihood of an unforeseen resonant combination of technical, climatic and humanitarian threats, possessing the capabilities of a comprehensive adaptive system. As a result, the role of the human factor as an active element of the sociotechnical system is increasing. The comparative characteristics of the concepts of classical Safety management systems (SMS), High Reliable Organization (HRO) and Resilience Engineering (RE) are given in terms of the possibilities for ensuring the safety of social and technical systems in a dynamic technosphere environment. Safety management systems (Safety-I) try to prevent future incidents based on past events, which does not reflect the dynamics of changes in the external and internal environment. High Reliable Organizations create excessive control loops and additional resources, which results in the loss of effectiveness of most organizations, and at the same time does not provide absolute safety. Resilience Engineering (Safety-II) relies on the normal variability of activity processes as a potential for proactive safety. Analysis of the role of the human factor suggests the need for the implementation of proactive safety management to prevent the occurrence of dangerous resonant states in the system. The proactive working behavior of personnel ensures the adaptation of functions to changing conditions of the external and internal environment of the organization and the anticipation of dangerous resonant variability of working activity. The synthesis of the traditional approach to safety (Safety-I) and Safety-II, based on the introduction of resilience engineering, allows for the prevention of dangerous resonant deviations in activity, while maintaining the necessary level of productivity and quality.
Keywords:
technosphere safety, resilience engineering, Safety-II, proactive safety management, anticipation, proactive working behavior
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Литература
Безопасность России. Правовые, социально-экономические и научно-технические аспекты // Фундаментальные и прикладные проблемы комплексной безопасности. М.: Знание, 2017.
Девисилов В.А. Культура безопасности и образование // Формирование культуры безопасности жизнедеятельности в образовательной среде: приоритеты, проблемы, решения. М., 2018. С. 19–23.
Лепехин Н.Н., Маничев С.А. Обеспечение техносферной безопасности социотехсистем на основе психологических факторов инжиниринга устойчивости // Материалы научно-практической конференции «Безопасность как фактор устойчивого развития общества». Республика Крым, г. Судак, 25–26 сентября 2019 год. Симферополь: ИТ «АРИАЛ», 2019. С. 233–239.
Новиков Н.Н. Роль и место специалиста по безопасности в организационной структуре компании // Безопасность и охрана труда. 2017. № 2. С. 13–22.
Proctor R., Zandt T. Human Factors in Simple and Complex Systems. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2018.
Performing safety culture self-assessments / International Atomic Energy Agency. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency, 2016.
Self-assessment of nuclear security culture in facilities and activities / International Atomic Energy Agency. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency, 2017.
Wetering R., Mikalef P., Helms R. Driving organizational sustainability-oriented innovation capabilities: a complex adaptive systems perspective // Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 2017. Vol. 28. P. 71–79.
Pushnoi G. S. MSP-Model of the Economic Complex Adaptive System (ECAS): Economy as a Complex Adaptive System / Method of Systems Potential (MSP) Applications in Economics: Emerging Research and Opportunities. IGI-Publishing. Hershey; London, 2017. P. 1–30.
Pariès J., Macchi L., Valot C., Deharvengt S. Comparing HROs and RE in the light of safety management systems // Safety Science. 2019. Vol. 117. P. 501–511.
Casler J.G. Revisiting NASA as a High Reliability Organization // Public Organization Review, Springer. 2014. Vol. 14 (2). P. 229–244.
Enya A., Pillay M., Dempsey S.A. Systematic Review on High Reliability Organisational Theory as a Safety Management Strategy in Construction // Safety. 2018. Vol. 4. Issue 1. No. 6. P. 1–18.
Borys D., Else D., Legget, S. The fifth age of safety: the adaptive age // Journal of Health & Safety Research in Practice. 2009. No. 1. P. 19–27.
Weick K.E., Kathleen M. Managing the Unexpected: Sustained Performance in a Complex World. John Wiley & Sons / N.J.Hoboken. 3rd ed., USA, New Jersey, 2015.
Hollnagel E., Woods D., Leveson N. Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2006.
Hollnagel E. Resilience Engineering: A New Understanding of Safety. Ergonomics Society of Korea // Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea. 2016. Vol. 35 (3). P. 185–191.
Hollnagel E. The nitty-gritty of human factors / S. Shorrock, C.Williams (Eds.). In: Human Factors and Ergonomics in Practice: Improving System Performance and Human Well-Being in the Real World. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press., 2016. P. 45–64.
Федорец А.Г. Менеджмент рисков в техносфере // Безопасность и охрана труда. 2017. № 2. С. 23–35.
The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Disaster: Investigating the Myth and Reality: The Independent Investigation on the Fukushima Nuclear Accident. Routledge, 2014.
Reason J. Safety paradoxes and safety culture // Injury Control & Safety Promotion. 2000. No. 7 (1). P. 3–14.
Hollnagel E. Is safety a subject for science? // Safety Science. 2014. Vol. 67. P. 21–24.
Furuta K. Resilience Engineering — A New Horizon of Systems Safety. In: Ahn J., Carson C., Jensen M. et al. Reflections on the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Accident: Toward Social‐Scientific Literacy and Engineering Resilience. New York: Springer. 2015. P. 435–454.
Леонтьев Д.А. Многоуровневая модель взаимодействия с неблагоприятными обстоятельствами: от защиты к изменению // Материалы III Международной научно-практической конференции. Кострома, 26–28 сентября 2013 г. Т. 1. Кострома: КГУ им. Н.А.Некрасова, 2013. С. 258–261.
Back J., Furniss D., Hildebrandt M., Blandford A. Resilience markers for safer systems and organisations. In: Computer safety, reliability, and security. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, Germany, 2008. P. 99–112.
Hollnagel E. Barriers and accident prevention. Routledge, London, 2016.
Hollnagel E., Nemeth C.P., Dekker S.W.A. (Eds) Resilience Engineering Perspectives. Vol. 1: Remaining Sensitive to the Possibility of Failure. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 2008.
Nemeth C.P., Hollnagel E. Resilience Engineering in Practise, vol. II: Becoming resilient. Farnham, UK: Ashgate. 2014.
Hollnagel E. The ETTO Principle: Why things that go right sometimes go wrong. Farnham, UK: Ashgate, 2009.
Hollnagel E. FRAM — the Functional Resonance Analysis Method: Modelling Complex Sociotechnical Systems. Farnham, UK: Ashgate, 2012.
Hollnagel E. Safety-I and Safety-II: The Past and Future of Safety Management. Farnham, UK: Ashgate, 2014.
Wahl A., Kongsvik T., Antonsen S. Balancing Safety-I and Safety-II: Learning to manage performance variability at sea using simulator-based training // Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2020. Vol. 195. P. 106–698.
Третьяков В.П. Порождающие игры как способ развития способности к апперцепции у эксплуатационного персонала энергообъектов // Труды Международной научно-практической конференции «Психология труда, инженерная психология и эргономика 2014» (Эрго-2014) / под ред. А.Н.Анохина, П.И.Падерно, С.Ф.Сергеева. 2014. С. 268–270.
Hollnagel E. Safety-II in Practice. Developing the Resilience Potentials. Routledge, 2017.
Третьяков В.П., Епатко С.С. Порождающая деловая игра «Охрана труда» // Человеческий фактор в сложных технических системах и средах (Эрго-2018) // Труды Третьей международной научно-практической конференции / под ред. А.Н.Анохина, А.А.Обознова, П.И.Падерно, С.Ф.Сергеева. 2018. С. 548–551.
References
The security of Russia. Legal, socio-economic and scientific-technical aspects. Fundamental’nyye i prikladnyye problemy kompleksnoy bezopasnosti. Moscow, Znanie Publ., 2017. (In Russian)
Devisilov V.A. Safety Culture and Education. Formation of a culture of life safety in the educational environment: priorities, problems, solutions. Moscow, 2018, pp. 19–23. (In Russian)
Lepekhin N.N., Manichev S.A. Ensuring the technosphere safety of socio-technical systems based on psychological factors of sustainability engineering. Materialy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii “Bezopasnost’ kak faktor ustoichivogo razvitiia obshchestva” , Respublika Krym, g. Sudak, 25–26 sentiabria 2019 goda. (In Russian)
Novikov N.N. Role and place of a specialist in safety in the organizational structure of the company. Bezopasnost’ i okhrana truda, 2017, no. 2, pp. 13–22. (In Russian)
Proctor R., Zandt T. Human Factors in Simple and Complex Systems. Boca Raton, CRC Press, 2018.
Performing safety culture self-assessments. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, International Atomic Energy Agency, 2016.
Self-assessment of nuclear security culture in facilities and activities. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, International Atomic Energy Agency, 2017.
Wetering R., Mikalef P., Helms R. Driving organizational sustainability-oriented innovation capabilities: a complex adaptive systems perspective. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2017, vol. 28, pp. 71–79.
Pushnoi G. S. MSP-Model of the Economic Complex Adaptive System (ECAS): Economy as a Complex Adaptive System. Method of Systems Potential (MSP) Applications in Economics: Emerging Research and Opportunities. IGI-Publishing, Hershey, London, 2017, pp. 1–30.
Pariès J., Macchi L., Valot C., Deharvengt S. Comparing HROs and RE in the light of safety management systems. Safety Science, 2019, vol. 117, pp. 501–511.
Casler J.G. Revisiting NASA as a High Reliability Organization. Public Organization Review, Springer, 2014, vol. 14 (2), pp. 229–244.
Enya A., Pillay M., Dempsey S.A. Systematic Review on High Reliability Organisational Theory as a Safety Management Strategy in Construction. Safety, 2018, vol. 4, issue 1, no. 6, pp. 1–18.
Borys D., Else D., Legget S. The fifth age of safety: the adaptive age. Journal of Health & Safety Research in Practice, 2009, vol. 1, pp. 19–27.
Weick K.E., Kathleen M. Managing the Unexpected: Sustained Performance in a Complex World. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 3rd ed., USA, 2015.
Hollnagel E., Woods D., Leveson N. Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2006.
Hollnagel E. Resilience Engineering: A New Understanding of Safety. Ergonomics Society of Korea. Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 2016, vol. 35 (3), pp. 185–191.
Hollnagel E. The nitty-gritty of human factors. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Practice: Improving System Performance and Human Well-Being in the Real World. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press, 2016, pp. 45–64.
Fedorets A.G. Risk management in the technosphere. Bezopasnost’ i okhrana truda, 2017, no 2, pp. 23–35. (In Russian)
The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Disaster. Investigating the Myth and Reality: The Independent Investigation on the Fukushima Nuclear Accident. Routledge, 2014.
Reason J. Safety paradoxes and safety culture. Injury Control & Safety Promotion, 2000, no. 7 (1), pp. 3–14.
Hollnagel E. Is safety a subject for science? Safety Science, 2014, vol. 67, pp. 21–24.
Furuta K. Resilience Engineering — A New Horizon of Systems Safety. Reflections on the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Accident: Toward Social‐Scientific Literacy and Engineering Resilience. New York, Springer, 2015, pp. 435–454.
Leont’yev D.A. Mnogourovnevaia model’ vzaimodeistviia s neblagopriiatnymi obstoiatel’stvami: ot zashchity k izmeneniiu. Materialy III Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. Kostroma, 26– 28 sentiabria 2013 g. , vol. 1, KGU im. N.A.Nekrasova Publ., 2013, pp. 258–261. (In Russian)
Back J., Furniss D., Hildebrandt M., Blandford A.Resilience markers for safer systems and organisations. Computer safety, reliability, and security. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer Verlag, 2008, pp. 99–112.
Hollnagel E. Barriers and accident prevention. Routledge, London, 2016.
Resilience Engineering Perspectives, Volume 1: Remaining Sensitive to the Possibility of Failure. Hollnagel E., Nemeth C.P., Dekker S.W.A. (Eds). Aldershot, UK, Ashgate, 2008.
Nemeth C.P., Hollnagel E. Resilience Engineering in Practice, vol. II, Becoming resilient, Farnham, UK, Ashgate, 2014.
Hollnagel E. The ETTO Principle: Why things that go right sometimes go wrong. Farnham, UK, Ashgate, 2009.
Hollnagel E. FRAM — The Functional Resonance Analysis Method: Modelling Complex Socio-technical Systems. Farnham, UK, Ashgate, 2012.
Hollnagel E. Safety-I and Safety-II: The Past and Future of Safety Management. Farnham, UK, Ashgate, 2014.
Wahl A., Kongsvik T., Antonsen S. Balancing Safety-I and Safety-II: Learning to manage performance variability at sea using simulator-based training, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2020, vol. 195, p. 106–698.
Tret’yakov V.P. Generating games as a way of developing the apperception ability of operating personnel of power facilities. Trudy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii «Psikhologiia truda, inzhenernaia psikhologiia i ergonomika 2014» (Ergo 2014), 2014, pp. 268–270. (In Russian)
Hollnagel E. Safety-II in Practice. Developing the Resilience Potentials. Routledge, 2017.
Tret’yakov V.P., Yepatko S. S. The Generating Business Game “Labor Protection”. Human factor in technical systems and environments (Ergo-2018). Trudy Tret’ei mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii, 2018, pp. 548–551. (In Russian)
Downloads
Published
2020-04-25
How to Cite
Manichev, S., & Lepekhin, N. (2020). Proactive safety management and proactive behavior of personnel as resources of Resilience Engineering. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology, 10(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2020.103
Issue
Section
Theoretical and Methodological Problems in Psychology
License
Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.
