Non-family intergenerational relations: problems and prospects

Authors

  • Olga Yu. Strizhitskaya Saint Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
  • Marina D. Petrash Saint Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4542-7289

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2019.302

Abstract

The problem of intergenerational relationships both within and outside family becomes more and more challenging for the society due to changing demographic situation. In the literature prevails the data on intergenerational relationships in family while non-family intergenerational relationships stay understudied. Present paper uncovers major trends in the research of nonfamily relationships. We consider the term “generation” as a key notion in intergenerational studies. Analysis of publications showed that there are several interpretations of the notion “generation” that complicates understanding the results in general. One of the most perspective directions in the interpretation of the “generation” would be the one that suggests that “generation” is one of the forms of social identity. Among a variety of studies on nonfamily intergenerational relationships we could identify two major blocks: intergenerational relationships at work place and intergenerational programs. Intergenerational relationships in work place are studied within the model of generational identity at work place and intergroup contact theory by Allport. The studies of intergenerational programs are based primarily on the ideas of experience sharing and advantages of different generations during such exchange. Also we consider the idea that intergenerational relationships can be a specific form of learning. Studies show that intergenerational research in non-family context are limited. These studies consider interaction of older and younger generations with accent on the positive effects of such interaction for older generation. Still there are no many-generational studies in non-family context. Paper compare the terms “intergenerational relationships” and “intergenerational interaction” and underlines that in modern society generations “meet” not only at the relationship level, but at a more situational level that is not analyzed in the studies

Keywords:

generation, intergenerational relationships, intergenerational relationships in work place, non-family intergenerational relationships

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Butler R. N. Age-Ism: Another Form of Bigotry // The Gerontologist. 1969. Vol. 9, issue 4. Part 1. Р. 243–246. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/9.4_Part1.243 (дата обращения: 01.05.2019).

Rowe J. W., Kahn R. L. Successful Aging 2.0: Conceptual Expansions for the 21st Century // Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences. 2015. Vol. 70, no. 4. P. 593–596. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbv025

Стрижицкая О. Ю. Позитивная психология старения: условия, факторы и социальные эффекты геротрансцендентности. Докторская диссертация на соискание ученой степени доктора наук. СПбГУ. 2018. 260 с.

Urick M. J., Hollensbe E. C., Fairhurs G. T. Differences in Understanding Generation in the Workforce // Journal of Intergenerational Relationships. 2017. Vol. 15 (3). P. 221–240. URL: https://proxy.library.spbu.ru:2151/10.1080/15350770.2017.1329583 (дата обращения: 01.05.2019).

Lyons S. T., Schweitzer L., Urick M. J., Kuron L. A dynamic social-ecological model of generational identity in the workplace // Journal of Intergenerational Relationships. 2019. Vol. 17 (1). Р. 1–24. URL: https://proxy.library.spbu.ru:2151/10.1080/15350770.2018.1500332 (дата обращения: 01.05.2019).

Joshi A., Dencker J. C., Franz G. Generations in organizations // Research in Organizational Behavior. 2011. Vol. 31. P. 177–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2011.10.002

Тайкова Л. В., Тайков С. В. Проблема межпоколенных отношений в современном обществе и семье // Вестник Новгородского государственного университета. 2015. № 88. C. 92–95.

Urick M. J., Hollensbe E. C. Toward an identity-based perspective of generations / E. Parry // Generational diversity at work: New research perspectives. New York: Routledge, 2014. P. 114–128.

Wiebe W. T., Zhang Y. B. Conflict Initiating Factors and Management Styles in Family and Nonfamily Intergenerational Relationships: Young Adults’ Retrospective Written Accounts // Journal of Language & Social Psychology. 2017. Vol. 36 (3). P. 368–379. URL: https://proxy.library.spbu.ru:2083/10.1177/0 261927X16660829 (дата обращения: 01.05.2019).

Stutzer K. Ask the Experts: Generational Differences and Multigenerational Teamwork // Critical Care Nurse. 2019. Vol. 39 (1). P. 78–81. URL: https://proxy.library.spbu.ru:2083/10.4037/ccn2019163 (дата обращения: 01.05.2019).

Bronfenbrenner U. Contexts of child rearing: Problems and prospects // American Psychologist. 1979. Vol. 34 (10). P. 844–850. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.844.

Finkelstein L. M., Gonnerman M. E., Foxgrover S. K. The stability of generation identification over time and across contexts // Experimental Aging Research. 2001. Vol. 27 (4). P. 377–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610730109342355

Allport G. W. The nature of prejudice. Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley, 1954. P. 29–47.

Pettigrew T. F., Tropp L. R. A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2006. Vol. 90. P. 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751

Lagac. M., Van de Beeck L., Firzly N. Building on Intergenerational Climate to Counter Ageism in the Workplace? A Cross-Organizational Study // Journal of Intergenerational Relationships. 2019.Vol. 17 (2). P. 201–219. URL: https://proxy.library.spbu.ru:2151/10.1080/15350770.2018.1535346 (дата обращения: 01.05.2019).

Wong E. L. Y., Lau J. Y. C., Yeoh E.-K. Thinking intergenerationally: intergenerational solidarity, health and active aging in Hong Kong // Journal of Intergenerational Relationships. 2019. Vol. 16 (4). P. 478–492. URL: https://proxy.library.spbu.ru:2151/10.1080/15350770.2018.1489328 (дата обращения: 01.05.2019)

Withnall A. Intergenerational relationships and lifelong learning: Missing links // Journal of Intergenerational Relationships. 2017. Vol. 15 (1).P. 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/15350770.2017.1260393.

Blais S., McCleary L., Garcia L., Robitaille A. Examining the Benefits of Intergenerational Volunteering in Long-Term Care: A Review of the Literature // Journal of Intergenerational Relationships. 2017. Vol. 15 (3). P. 258–272. URL: https://proxy.library.spbu.ru:2151/10.1080/15350770.2017.1330056 (дата обращения: 01.05.2019).


References

Butler R. N. Age-Ism: Another Form of Bigotry. The Gerontologist, 1969, vol. 9, issue 4, part 1, pp. 243–246. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/9.4_Part_1.243 (accessed: 01.05.2019).

Rowe J. W., Kahn R. L. Successful Aging 2.0: Conceptual Expansions for the 21st Century. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 2015, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 593–596. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbv025

Strizhitskaya O. Yu. Positive psychology of aging: conditions, factors and social effects of gerontranscendence. Doktorskaia dissertatsiia na soiskanie uchenoi stepeni doktora nauk. SPbGU, 2018. 260 p. (In Russian)

Urick M. J., Hollensbe E. C., Fairhurs, G. T. Differences in Understanding Generation in the Workforce. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 2017, vol. 15 (3), pp. 221–240. Available at: https://proxy.library.spbu.ru:2151/10.1080/15350770.2017.1329583 (accessed: 01.05.2019).

Lyons S. T., Schweitzer L., Urick M. J., Kuron L. A dynamic social-ecological model of generational

identity in the workplace. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 2019, vol. 17 (1), pp. 1–24. Available at: https://proxy.library.spbu.ru:2151/10.1080/15350770.2018.1500332 (accessed: 01.05.2019).

Joshi A., Dencker J. C., Franz G. Generations in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 2011, vol. 31, pp. 177–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2011.10.002

Tajkova L. V., Tajkov S. V. Problem of intergenerational relationships in modern society and family.Vestnik Novgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2015, no. 88, pp. 92–95.

Urick M. J., Hollensbe E. C. Toward an identity-based perspective of generations. Ed. by E. Parry. Generational diversity at work: New research perspectives. New York, Routledge, 2014, pp. 114–128.

Wiebe W. T., Zhang Y. B. Conflict Initiating Factors and Management Styles in Family and Nonfamily Intergenerational Relationships: Young Adults’ Retrospective Written Accounts. Journal of Language & Social Psychology, 2017, vol. 36 (3), pp. 368–379. Available at: https://proxy.library.spbu.ru:2083/10.1177/0261927X16660829 (accessed: 01.05.2019).

Stutzer K. Ask the Experts: Generational Differences and Multigenerational Teamwork. Critical Care Nurse, 2019, vol. 39 (1), pp. 78–81. Available at https://proxy.library.spbu.ru:2083/10.4037/ccn2019163 (accessed: 01.05.2019).

Bronfenbrenner U. Contexts of child rearing: Problems and prospects. American Psychologist, 1979, vol. 34 (10), pp. 844–850. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X. 34.10.844

Finkelstein L. M., Gonnerman M. E., Foxgrover S. K. The stability of generation identification over time and across contexts. Experimental Aging Research, 2001, vol. 27 (4), pp. 377–397. https://doi.

org/10.1080/03610730109342355

Allport G. W. The nature of prejudice. Reading. MA, Addison-Wesley, 1954, pp. 29–47.

Pettigrew T. F., Tropp L. R. A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2006, vol. 90, pp. 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751

Lagac. M., Van de Beeck L., Firzly N. Building on Intergenerational Climate to Counter Ageism in the Workplace? A Cross-Organizational Study. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 2019, vol. 17 (2), pp. 201–219. Available at: https://proxy.library.spbu.ru:2151/10.1080/15350770.2018.1535346 (accessed: 01.05.2019).

Wong E. L. Y., Lau J. Y. C., Yeoh E.-K. Thinking intergenerationally: intergenerational solidarity, health and active aging in Hong Kong. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 2019, vol. 16 (4), pp. 478–492. Available at: https://proxy.library.spbu.ru:2151/10.1080/15350770.2018.1489328 (accessed: 01.05.2019).

Withnall A. Intergenerational relationships and lifelong learning: Missing links. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 2017, vol. 15 (1), pp. 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/15350770.2017.1260393

Blais S., McCleary L., Garcia L., Robitaille A. Examining the Benefits of Intergenerational Volunteering in Long-Term Care: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 2017, vol. 15 (3), pp. 258–272. Available at: https://proxy.library.spbu.ru:2151/10.1080/15350770.2017.1330056 (accessed: 01.05.2019).

Downloads

Published

2019-10-18

How to Cite

Strizhitskaya, O. Y., & Petrash, M. D. (2019). Non-family intergenerational relations: problems and prospects. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology, 9(3), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2019.302

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 3 (2019)

Section

Theory and Methodology of Psychology

License

Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.