Influence of expectation of conflict stimuli on Stroop effect
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu16.2017.203Abstract
In this article we discuss a possible interpretation of the interference effect. We suggest that the Stroop interference is a result of Task Control process. Experiments (N = 90) test a hypothesis that interference effect appears when participants have a capability to make a mistake, i.e. choose an answer for an irrelevant dimension of Stroop stimuli. Data shows that lack of such capability leads to decrease of interference effect because cognitive control over irrelevant task is reduced.
Keywords:
interference, response set effect, Task Control, interference mistake, Stroop effect
Downloads
No metrics available.
References
Литература
Stroop J.R. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions // Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1935. Vol. 18. P. 643–662.
MacLeod C.M. Half a century of research on the Stroop effect An integrative review // Psychological Bulletin. 1991. Vol. 109. P. 163–203.
Blais C., Besner D. Reverse Stroop effects with untranslated responses // J.Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2006. Vol. 32. P. 1345–1353.
Blais C., Besner D. A reverse Stroop effect without translation or reading difficulty // Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2007. Vol. 14. P. 466–469.
Schulz T. Colour-Word-Interference: Why we should measure it with coloured keys. URL: https:// www.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/kognition-ako/cwi_neu2_short_APA_5_1.pdf (дата обращения: 14.07.2017).
Durgin F. The reverse Stroop effect // Psychon Bull Rev. 2000. Vol. 7 (1). Р. 121–125.
Lupker S.J., Katz A.N. Input, decision, and response factors in picture–word interference // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory. 1981. Vol. 7. Р. 269–282.
Klein G. Semantic power measured through the interference of words with color-naming // American Journal of Psychology. 1964. Vol. 77. Р. 576–588.
Sharma D., McKenna F. Differential components of the manual and vocal Stroop tasks // Memory & Cognition. 1998. Vol. 26. Р. 1033–1040.
Levin Y., Tzelgov J. What Klein’s “Semantic Gradient” Does and Does Not Really Show: Decomposing Stroop Interference into Task and Informational Conflict Components // Front Psychol. 2016. Vol. 7. Р. 249.
Steinhauser M., Hübner R. Distinguishing response conflict and task conflict in the Stroop task: Evidence from ex-Gaussian distribution analysis // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2009. Vol. 35. Р. 1398–1400.
Аллахвердов В.М., Аллахвердов М.В. Феномен Струпа: интерференция как логический парадокс // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Серия 16. Психология. Педагогика. 2014. № 4. С. 90–102.
MacLeod C. Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review // Psychological Bulletin. 1991. Vol. 109(2). Р. 163–203.
Dunbar K.N., MacLeod C.M. A horse race of a different color: Stroop interference patterns with transformed words // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1984. Vol. 10. Р. 622–639.
Lamers M., Roelofs A., Rabeling-Keus I. Selective attention and response set in the Stroop task // Memory & Cognition. 2010. Vol. 38 (7). Р. 893–904.
Janssen N., Schirm W., Mahon B.Z., Caramazza A. Semantic interference in a delayed naming task: Evidence for the response exclusion hypothesis // Journal of experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 2008. Vol. 34. Р. 249–256.
Levelt J.M.W., Roelofs A., Meyer A. S. A theory of lexical access in speech production // Behavioural and Brain Sciences. 1999. Vol. 22. Р. 1–75. 18. Goldfarb L.& Henik A. Evidence for task conflict in the Stroop effect // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2007. Vol. 33. Р. 1170–1176.
Kalanthroff E., Goldfarb L., Usher M., Henik A. Stop interfering: Stroop task conflict independence from informational conflict and interference // The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2013. Vol. 66, Issue 7. P. 1356–1367.
Parris B.A. Task conflict in the Stroop task: When Stroop interference decreases as Stroop facilitation increases in a low task conflict context // Frontiers in Psychology. 2014. Vol. 5. Р. 1182–1191.
Logan G.D., Zbrodoff N.J., Williamson J. Strategies in the color-word Stroop task // Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. 1984. Vol. 22. Р. 135–138.
Gonthier C., Braver T. S., Bugg J.M. Dissociating proactive and reactive control in the Stroop task // Memory & Cognition. 2016. Vol. 44, Issue 5. Р. 778–788.
Schmidt J.R., Besner D. The Stroop effect: Why proportion congruent has nothing to do with congruency and everything to do with contingency // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 2008. Vol. 34. Р. 514–523.
Jacoby L.L., Lindsay D. S., Hessels S. Item-specific control of automatic processes: Stroop process dissociations // Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2003. Vol. 10. Р. 634–644.
Bugg J., Jacoby L.L., Toth J.P. Multiple levels of control in the Stroop task // Memory & Cognition. 2008. Vol. 36. Р. 1484–1494.
Entel O., Tzelgov J., Bereby-Meyer Y. Proportion congruency effects: instruction may be enough // Frontiers in Psychology. 2014. Vol. 6, Issue 5. Р. 1108–1022.
Bibi U., Tzelgov J., Henik A. Stroop effect in words that differ from color words in one letter only // Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2000. Vol. 7 (4). Р. 678–683.
Морошкина Н.В., Гершкович В.А. Сознательный контроль в мнемических задачах и задачах научения // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Серия 12. Психология. Социология. Педагогика. 2008. № 2. С. 91–100.
Аллахвердов В.М. Сознание, научение и контроль: вперед к теории (доклад) // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Серия 16. Психология. Педагогика. 2014. № 4. С. 41–51.
Аллахвердов В.М. Опыт теоретической психологии (в жанре научной революции). СПб.: Печ. двор, 1993. 325 с.
Аллахвердов В.М. Научение и типы когнитивного контроля // Седьмая международная конференция по когнитивной науке: Тез. докл. / отв. ред. Ю.И.Александров, К.В.Анохин. М.: Издво «Институт психологии РАН», 2016. С. 104–106.
Киреева Н.Н. Эффекты интерференции в процессах обработки информации человеком: дис. … канд. психол. наук. Л., 1986. 319 с.
Kahneman D. & Chajzyk D. Tests of the automaticity of reading: Dilution of color-irrelevant stimuli // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1983. Vol. 9. Р. 497–508.
Стародубцев А.С., Аллахвердов М.В. Влияние предсказуемости стимула на эффект Струпа // Ананьевские чтения — 2016. Психология: вчера, сегодня, завтра: мат-лы международ. науч. конф., 25–29 октября 2016 г.: в 2 т. / отв. ред. А.В.Шаболас, Н.В.Гришина, С.В.Медников, Д.Н.Волков. СПб.: Айсинг, 2016. Т. 2. С 48–49.
Botvinick M.M., Braver T. S., Barch D.M., Carter C. S., Cohen J.D. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control // Psychol Rev. 2001. Vol. 108. Р. 624–652.
Фаликман М.В., Печенкова Е.В. Стратегическая регуляция решения перцептивной задачи как класс нисходящих влияний на процесс построения перцептивного образа // Первая Российская конференция по когнитивной науке: Тез. докл. Казань: КГУ, 2004. С. 237–239.
Аллахвердов М.В. Интерпретация интерференционных феноменов и теория «иронического» мышления Дэниела Вегнера // Петербургский психологический журнал. 2015. № 12. С. 16–37.
Wegner D.M. Ronic processes of mental control // Psychological Review. 1994. Vol. 101 (1). P. 34–52.
Navon D. From Pink Elephants to Psychosomatic Disorders: Paradoxical Effects in Cognition // Psycoloquy. 1994. Vol. 5 (36).
References
Stroop J.R. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1935, vol. 18, рр. 643–662.
MacLeod C.M. Half a century of research on the Stroop effect An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 1991, vol. 109, рр. 163–203.
Blais C., Besner D. Reverse Stroop effects with untranslated responses. J.Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform, 2006, vol. 32, рр. 1345–1353.
Blais C., Besner D. A reverse Stroop effect without translation or reading difficulty. Psychon. Bull. Rev. , 2007, vol. 14, рр. 466–469.
Schulz T. Colour-Word-Interference: Why we should measure it with coloured keys. Available at: https://www.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/kognition-ako/cwi_neu2_short_APA_5_1.pdf (accessed: 14.07.2017).
Durgin F. The reverse Stroop effect. Psychon Bull Rev. , 2000, 7(1), pp. 121–125.
Lupker, S.J., & Katz, A.N.Input, decision, and response factors in picture–word interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 1981, vol.7, рр. 269–282.
Klein G. Semantic power measured through the interference of words with color-naming. American Journal of Psychology, 1964, vol. 77, рр. 576–588.
Sharma D., McKenna F. Differential components of the manual and vocal Stroop tasks. Mem. Cogn. , 1998, vol. 26, рр. 1033–1040.
Levin Y, Tzelgov J. What Klein’s “Semantic Gradient” Does and Does Not Really Show: Decomposing Stroop Interference into Task and Informational Conflict Components. Front Psychol. , 2016, Feb 26, vol. 7, р. 249.
Steinhauser M., Hübner R. Distinguishing response conflict and task conflict in the Stroop task: Evidence from ex-Gaussian distribution analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2009, vol. 35, рр. 1398–1400.
Allahverdov V.M., Allahverdov M.V. Fenomen Strupa: interferentsiia kak logicheskii paradoks [Stroop Phenomenon: Interference as a logical Paradox]. Vestnik SPbSU. Series 16. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2014, iss. 4, pp. 90–102. (In Russian)
MacLeod C. Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 1991, vol. 109(2), pp. 163–203.
Dunbar K.N., MacLeod C.M. A horse race of a different color: Stroop interference patterns with transformed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1984, vol. 10, рр. 622–639.
Lamers M., Roelofs A., Rabeling-Keus I. Selective attention and response set in the Stroop task. Memory & Cognition, 2010, vol. 38(7), pp. 893–904.
Janssen N., Schirm W., Mahon B.Z., Caramazza A. Semantic interference in a delayed naming task: Evidence for the response exclusion hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 2008, vol. 34, рр. 249–256.
Levelt J.M.W., Roelofs A., Meyer A. S. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 1999, vol. 22, рр. 1–75.
Goldfarb L., Henik A. Evidence for task conflict in the Stroop effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2007, vol. 33, рр. 1170–1176.
Eyal Kalanthroff, Liat Goldfarb, Marius Usher & Avishai Henik. Stop interfering: Stroop task conflict independence from informational conflict and interference. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2013, vol. 66, issue 7, рр. 1356–1367.
Parris B.A. Task conflict in the Stroop task: When Stroop interference decreases as Stroop facilitation increases in a low task conflict context. Frontiers in Psychology, 2014, vol. 5, р. 1182.
Logan G.D., Zbrodoff N.J., Williamson J. Strategies in the color–word Stroop task. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1984, vol. 22, рр. 135–138.
Gonthier C., Braver T. S., Bugg J.M. Dissociating proactive and reactive control in the Stroop task. Mem. Cogn. , 2016, vol. 44, р. 778.
Schmidt J.R., Besner D. The Stroop effect: Why proportion congruent has nothing to do with congruency and everything to do with contingency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2008, vol. 34, рр. 514–523.
Jacoby L.L., Lindsay D. S., Hessels S. Item-specific control of automatic processes: Stroop process dissociations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2003, vol. 10, рр. 634–644.
Bugg J., Jacoby L.L., Toth J.P. Multiple levels of control in the Stroop task. Memory & Cognition, 2008, vol. 36, рр. 1484–1494.
Entel O., Tzelgov J., Bereby-Meyer Y. Proportion congruency effects: instruction may be enough. Frontiers in Psychology, 2014, vol. 6, issue 5, рр. 1108–1022.
Bibi U., Tzelgov J., Henik A. Stroop effect in words that differ from color words in one letter only. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2000, vol. 7 (4), pp. 678–683.
Moroshkina N.V., Gershkovich V.A. Soznatel'nyi kontrol' v mnemicheskikh zadachakh i zadachakh naucheniia [Conscious Control in Mnemonic Tasks and Learning Tasks]. Vestnik SPbSU. Series 12. Psychology, Sociology, Pedagogy, 2008, issue 2, pp. 91–100. (In Russian)
Allahverdov V.M. Soznanie, nauchenie i kontrol': vpered k teorii (doklad) [Consciousness, Learning and Control: Towards a Theory (Speech)]. Vestnik SPbSU, Series 16. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2014, issue 4, pp. 41–51. (In Russian)
Allahverdov V.M. Opyt teoreticheskoi psihologii (v zhanre nauchnoi revoliutsii) [Experiencing Theoretical Psychology (in a Genre of Scientific Revolution) ]. St. Petersburg, Pech. Dvor, 1993. 325 p. (In Russian)
Allahverdov V.M. Nauchenie i tipy kognitivnogo kontrolia [Learning and Types of Cognitive Control]. Sed'maia mezhdunarodnaia konferentsiia po kognitivnoi nauke [Seventh International Conference on Cognitive Studies]. Tezisy dokladov [Abstracts]. Eds Yu.I.Aleksandrov, K.V.Anohin. Moscow, Publishing house “Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences”, 2016, pp. 104–106. (In Russian)
Kireeva N.N. Effekty interferentsii v protsessakh obrabotki informatsii chelovekom: dis. kand. psihol. nauk [Interference Effects during Information Processing. Dissertation], Leningrad, 1986. 319 p. (In Russian)
Kahneman D., Chajzyk D. Tests of the automaticity of reading: Dilution of color-irrelevant stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1983, vol. 9, pp. 497–508.
Starodubcev A. S., Allahverdov M.V. [Influence of Stimuli Predictability on Stroop Effect]. Anan'evskie chteniia — 2016. Psikhologiia: vchera, segodnia, zavtra: Mat-ly mezhdunarod. nauch. konf., 25– 29 oktiabria 2016 g.: v 2 t.. Tom 2. [Ananiev Proceedings — 2016: Psychology: Past, Now and Future. Materials of International Scientific Conference, 25–29 October 2016, Vol. 2]. Eds. A.V. Shaboltas, N.V.Grishina, S.V.Mednikov, D.N.Volkov. St. Petersburg, Aising, 2016, рp. 48–49. (In Russian)
Botvinick M.M, Braver T. S., Barch D.M., Carter C. S., Cohen J.D. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychol. Rev., 2001, vol. 108, рр. 624–652.
Falikman M.V., Pechenkova E.V. [Strategic Regulation of Perception Task Solution as a Top-down Influence on Constructing Perceptual Representation]. Pervaia Rossiiskaia konferentsiia po kognitivnoi nauke: Tezisy dokladov [First Russian Conference on Cognitive Studies. Abstracts]. Kazan', KGU, 2004, pp. 237–239. (In Russian)
Allahverdov M.V. Interpretatsiia interferentsionnykh fenomenov i teoriia «ironicheskogo» myshleniia Deniela Vegnera [Interpretation of Stroop Effect and Wegner’s Ironic Thought Processing Theory]. Peterburgskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal [Petersburg Psychological Journal], 2015, issue 12, рр. 16–37.
Wegner D.M. Ironic processes of mental control. Psychological Review, 1994, vol. 101(1), рр. 34–52.
Navon D. From Pink Elephants to Psychosomatic Disorders: Paradoxical Effects in Cognition. Psycoloquy [on-line serial], 1994, vol. 5(36).
Downloads
Published
2017-08-25
How to Cite
Стародубцев, А. С., & Аллахвердов, М. В. (2017). Influence of expectation of conflict stimuli on Stroop effect. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology, 7(2), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu16.2017.203
Issue
Section
General psychology, personality psychology, history of psychology
License
Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.
