Исследование субъектных и личностных характеристик  в русле системно-субъектного подхода

Nadezhda Pavlova

doi:10.21638/spbu16.2023.402

Authors

Nadezhda Pavlova Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 13, Yaroslavskaya ul., Moscow, 129366, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1518-1137

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2023.402

Abstract

The paper deals with the category formation of "subject" in Russian psychology in line with the subject-activity approach of S.L. Rubinshtein. Then the idea of the subject was developed in the works of A.V. Brushlinsky, as well as in the systemic-subjective approach of E.A. Sergienko. It is shown that S.L. Rubinshtein formulated the position about the subject as an active doer, the creator of his life and history. This position was further significantly enriched by A.V. Brushlinsky due to his continuum-genetic theory and resulted in a new direction – the subject psychology as an integrative study of human psychology. The system-subject approach of E.A. Sergienko is a development of the subject psychology and combines systemic and subject-activity approaches. It substantiates the level understanding of the criteria of subjectivity. It is proposed to consider the categories of subject and personality in the unity of individuality, but at the same time having their own specifics. The personality is a nuclear, content aspect (generation of meanings, values, orientation). While the subject is an individual opportunity for choices, goals, and the implementation of tasks, taking into account both situations, as well as individual orientation and interactions’ meanings. The specific functions of the subject and personality are described. The development concept of subject and personality at the entire ontogenesis stage is presented. A processual understanding of psychological maturity is proposed. Studies clarifying and verifying the system-subject approach are summarized: the subject and the personality characteristics of people of different professions in relation to the time perspective; mental resources for regulating behavior at the late ontogenesis stage. It is concluded that the development principle and the subject psychology can become the basis for a holistic study of human psychology and the unification of various schools and paradigms, theory and practice.

Keywords:

subject-activity approach, system approach, the subject psychology, continuo-genetic approach, system-subject approach, subject, personality, subject-activity approach, system approach, the subject psychology, continuo-genetic approach, system-subject approach, subject, personality

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Литература

Анцыферова Л. И. Развитие личности и проблемы геронтологии. 2-е изд., испр. и доп. М.: Институт психологии РАН, 2006.

Богданович Н. В. Субъект как категория отечественной психологии: дис. … канд. психол. наук. М., 2004.

Брушлинский А. В. Психология субъекта и его деятельности // Современная психология: Справочное руководство / под ред. В. Н. Дружинина. М.: Институт психологии РАН, 1999. С. 330–346.

Брушлинский А. В. О критериях субъекта // Психология индивидуального и группового субъекта / под ред. А. В. Брушлинского. М.: Институт психологии РАН, 2002. С. 9–33.

Брушлинский А. В. Психология субъекта. М.: Институт психологии РАН; СПб.: Алетейя, 2003.

Ветрова И. И. Соотношение контроля поведения, совладания и психологических защит // Стресс, выгорание, совладание в современном контексте / под ред. А. Л. Журавлева, Е. А. Сергиенко. М.: Институт психологии РАН, 2011. С. 275–295.

Ветрова И. И. Контроль поведения как фактор проактивного совладающего поведения в подростковом возрасте // Психология повседневного и травматического стресса: угрозы, последствия и совладание. М.: Институт психологии РАН, 2016. С. 419–440.

Виленская Г. А. Средовые и генетические влияния на контроль поведения в раннем онтогенезе человека // Психологический журнал. 2007. Т. 28, № 4. С. 52–63.

Виленская Г. А. Регуляция поведения в раннем возрасте // Психология сегодня: теория, образование и практика / под ред. А. Л. Журавлева, Е. А. Сергиенко, А. В. Карпова. М.: Институт психологии РАН, 2009. С. 70–86.

Знаков В. В. Теоретические основания психологии понимания многомерного мира человека // Вопросы психологии. 2014. № 4. С. 16–29.

Знаков В. В. Психология понимания мира человека. М.: Институт психологии РАН, 2016.

Знаков В. В. Психология возможного: Новое направление исследований понимания. М.: Институт психологии РАН, 2021. https://doi.org/10.38098/mng.2021.12.48.001

Знаков В. В., Сергиенко Е. А. Андрей Владимирович Брушлинский: Жизнь, отданная науке // Методология и история психологии. 2018. № 2. С. 5–21. https://doi.org/10.7868/S1819265318020012

Котелевцев Н. А., Хомутова О. М. Современное понимание категории субъекта и субъектности в исследованиях зарубежных ученых // Ученые записки: Электронный научный журнал Курского государственного университета. 2020. № 2 (54). URL: https://api-mag.kursksu.ru/api/v1/get_pdf/3645/ (дата обращения: 17.03.2023).

Лебедева Е. И., Виленская Г. А., Уланова А. Ю., Филиппу О. Ю., Павлова Н. С. Социальная компетентность подростков с разным уровнем развития модели психического // Психологический журнал. 2023. Т. 44, № 1. С. 43–54. https://doi.org/10.31857/S020595920024342-2

Леонтьев Д. А. Что дает психологии понятие субъекта: субъектность как измерение личности // Эпистемология и философия науки. 2010. Т. 25, № 3. С. 135–153.

Микова Т. С. Субъектные и личностные характеристики женщин с травматичным опытом искусственного прерывания беременности: автореф. дис. … канд. психол. наук. М., 2012.

Павлова Н. С. Глава X. Благополучное старение в позднем онтогенезе // Онто- и субъектогенез психического развития человека / под ред. Н. Е. Харламенковой, В. В. Знакова, Е. А. Сергиенко, Н. Н. Казымовой. М.: Институт психологии РАН, 2022a. С. 220–234. http://dx.doi.org/10.38098/mng_22_0452

Павлова Н. С. Исследование субъективного качества жизни и субъективного благополучия в позднем онтогенезе // Сибирский психологический журнал. 2022b. № 86. С. 84–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.17223/17267080/86/5

Павлова Н. С., Сергиенко Е. А. Субъектная и личностная регуляция поведения как проявление индивидуальности человека // Психологический журнал. 2016. Т. 37, № 2. С. 43–56.

Панов В. И. Экопсихология развития: гносеологическая и онтологическая парадигмы // Познание и переживание. 2020. Т. 1, № 1. С. 38–54. https://doi.org/10.51217/cogexp_2020_01_01_03

Панов В. И. Экопсихологический подход к развитию психики: этапы, предпосылки, конструкты // Теоретическая и экспериментальная психология. 2022. № 3. С. 100–117. https://doi.org/10.24412/2073-0861-2022-3-100-117

Рубинштейн С. Л. Основы общей психологии. СПб.: Питер, 2002.

Рубинштейн С. Л. Бытие и сознание. СПб.: Питер, 2012.

Селезнева М. В. Сравнительный анализ понятий «субъект» и «субъектность» в зарубежной психологии // Вестник РУДН. Сер. Психология и педагогика. 2015. № 2. С. 47–53.

Сергиенко Е. А. Психическое развитие с позиций системно-субъектного подхода. М.: Институт психологии РАН, 2021. https://doi.org/10.38098/mng_21_0435

Сергиенко Е. А., Виленская Г. А., Ковалева Ю. В. Контроль поведения как субъектная регуляция. М.: Институт психологии РАН, 2010.

Сергиенко Е. А., Знаков В. В., Харламенкова Н. Е. Индивидуальный субъект в психологии // Разработка понятий современной психологии / отв. ред. А. Л. Журавлев, Е. А. Сергиенко. М.: Институт психологии РАН, 2018. С. 63–115.

Сергиенко Е. А., Уланова А. Ю., Лебедева Е. И. Модель психического: Структура и динамика. М.: Институт психологии РАН, 2020.

Чистякова Н. В. Молекулярно-генетические предпосылки контроля поведения как фактора психологической готовности к родам: автореф. дис. … канд. психол. наук. М., 2013.

Bandura A. An agentic perspective on positive psychology // Positive psychology: Exploring the best in people / ed. by S. J. Lopez. Wesport: Greenwood Publishing Company, 2008. Р. 167–196.

Brezina T. Freedom of action, freedom of choice, and desistance from crime: Pitfalls and opportunities in the study of human agency // Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology. 2020. Vol. 6 (2). P. 224–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-019-00111-w

Dattathrani S., De’ R. The concept of agency in the era of artificial intelligence: Dimensions and degrees // Information Systems Frontiers. 2023. Vol. 25 (1). P. 29–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10336-8

Harre R. Personal being: A theory for individual psychology. Oxford: Blackwell, 1983.

Hewson M. Agency // Encyclopedia of Case Study Research / eds A. Mills, G. Durepos, E. Wiebe. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. 2010. P. 12–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412957397.n5

Madary M. The illusion of agency in human — computer interaction // Neuroethics. 2022. Vol. 15 (1), no. 16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-022-09491-1

Markus H. R., Kitayama S. Models of agency: Sociocultural diversity in the constructor of action // Cross-cultural Differences in Perspectives on the Self / eds V. Murphy-Berman, J. Berman. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2003. P. 18–74.

Petrich D. M. A self-determination theory perspective on human agency, desistance from crime, and correctional rehabilitation // Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology. 2020. Vol. 6 (3). P. 353–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-020-00141-9

Popa E. Human goals are constitutive of agency in artificial intelligence (AI) // Philosophy & Technology. 2021. Vol. 34. P. 1731–1750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00483-2

Rovane C. Is group agency a social phenomenon? // Synthese. 2019. Vol. 196 (12). P. 4869–4898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1384-1

Silver C. A., Tatler B. W., Chakravarthi R., Timmermans B. Social Agency as a continuum // Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2021. Vol. 28 (2). P. 434–453. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01845-1

References

Antsyferova, L. I. (2006). Personality Development and Problems of Gerontology. 2nd edition. Moscow, Institut psikhologii RAN Press. (In Russian)

Bandura, A. (2008). An agentic perspective on positive psychology. In: S. J. Lopez (ed.). Positive Psychology: Exploring the best in people (pp. 167–196). Wesport, Greenwood Publishing Company.

Bogdanovich, N. V. (2004). Subject as a Category of Psychology in Russia. PhD dissertation (Psychology). Moscow. (In Russian)

Brezina, T. (2020). Freedom of action, freedom of choice, and desistance from crime: Pitfalls and opportunities in the study of human agency. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 6 (2), 224–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-019-00111-w

Brushlinskii, A. V. (1999). Psychology of the subject and his activity. In: V. N. Druzhinin (ed.), Sovremennaia psikhologiia: Spravochnoe rukovodstvo (pp. 330–346). Moscow, Institut psikhologii RAN Press. (In Russian)

Brushlinskii, A. V. (2002). On the criteria of the subject. In: A. V. Brushlinskii (ed.). Psikhologiia Individual’nogo i Gruppovogo Sub”ekta (pp. 9–33). Moscow, Institut psikhologii RAN Press. (In Russian)

Brushlinskii, A. V. (2003). Psychology of the Subject. Moscow, Institut psikhologii RAN Press, St. Petersburg, Aleteiia Publ. (In Russian)

Chistiakova, N. V. (2013). Molecular Genetic Prerequisites for Behavior Control as a Factor of Psychological Readiness for Childbirth. PhD dissertation (Psychology). Moscow. (In Russian)

Dattathrani, S., De’, R. (2023). The concept of agency in the era of artificial intelligence: Dimensions and degrees. Information Systems Frontiers, 25 (1), 29–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10336-8

Harre, R. (1983). Personal Being: a theory for individual psychology. Oxford, Blackwell.

Hewson, M. (2010). Agency. In: A. Mills, G. Durepos, E. Wiebe (eds.). Encyclopedia of Case Study Research (pp. 12–16). Thousand Oaks, SAGE Publications. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412957397.n5

Kotelevtsev, N. A., Khomutova, O. M. (2020). Modern understanding of the category of subject and subjectivity in the research of foreign scientists. Uchenye Zapiski: Elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal Kurskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2 (54). Available at: https://apimag.kursksu.ru/api/v1/get_pdf/3645/ (accessed: 17.03.2023). (In Russian)

Lebedeva, E. I., Vilenskaia, G. A., Ulanova, A. Yu., Filippu, O. Yu., Pavlova, N. S. (2023). Social competence in adolescents with different level of theory of mind. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 44 (1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.31857/S020595920024342-2 (In Russian)

Leont’ev, D. A. (2010). What gives psychology the concept of the subject: Subjectivity as a dimension of personality. Epistemologiia i Filosofiia Nauki, 3 (25), 135–153.

Madary, M. (2022). The illusion of agency in human — computer interaction. Neuroethics, 15 (1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-022-09491-1

Markus, H. R., Kitayama, S. (2003). Models of agency: Sociocultural diversity in the constructor of action. In: V. Murphy-Berman, J. Berman (eds.). Cross-Cultural Differences in Perspectives on the Self (pp. 18–74). Lincoln, University of Nebraska Press.

Mikova, T. S. (2012). Subjective and personal characteristics of women with traumatic experience of artificial termination of pregnancy. PhD dissertation (Psychology). Moscow. (In Russian)

Panov, V. I. (2020). Ecopsychology of development: epistemological and ontological paradigms. Poznanie i Perezhivanie, 1 (1), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.51217/cogexp_2020_01_01_03 (In Russian)

Panov, V. I. (2022). Ecopsychological approach to psyche development: stages, prerequisites, constructs. Teoreticheskaia i Eksperimental’naia Psikhologiia, 3, 100–117. https://doi.org/10.24412/2073-0861-2022-3-100-117 (In Russian)

Pavlova, N. S. (2022a). Chapter X. Successful aging in late ontogenesis. In: N. E. Kharlamenkova, V. V. Znakov, E. A. Sergienko, N. N. Kazymova (eds), Onto- i sub”ektogenez psikhicheskogo razvitiia cheloveka (pp. 220–234). Moscow, Institut psikhologii RAN Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.38098/mng_22_0452 (In Russian)

Pavlova, N. S. (2022b). The study of subjective life quality and subjective well-being in late ontogenesis. Sibirskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 86, 84–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.17223/17267080/86/5 (In Russian)

Pavlova, N. S., Sergienko, E. A. (2016). Subject and personal regulation of behavior as a manifestation of man’s individuality. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 37 (2), 43–56. (In Russian)

Petrich, D. M. (2020). A self-determination theory perspective on human agency, desistance from crime, and correctional rehabilitation. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 6 (3), 353–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-020-00141-9

Popa, E. (2021). Human goals are constitutive of agency in artificial intelligence (AI). Philosophy & Technology, 34, 1731–1750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00483-2

Rovane, C. (2019). Is group agency a social phenomenon? Synthese, 196 (12), 4869–4898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1384-1

Rubinshtein, S. L. (2002). Fundamentals of General Psychology. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ. (In Russian)

Rubinshtein, S. L. (2012). Being and Consciousness. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ. (In Russian)

Selezneva, M. V. (2015). The comparative analysis of the terms “subject” and “agency” in the foreign psychology. Vestnik RUDN. Ser. Psikhologiia i pedagogika, 2, 47–53. (In Russian)

Sergienko, E. A. (2021). Mental Development from the Standpoint of a System-Subject Approach. Moscow, Institut psikhologii RAN Press. https://doi.org/10.38098/mng_21_0435 (In Russian)

Sergienko, E. A., Ulanova, A. Yu., Lebedeva, E. I. (2020). Theory of mind: structure and dynamics. Moscow, Institut psikhologii RAN Press. (In Russian)

Sergienko, E. A., Vilenskaia, G. A., Kovaleva, Yu. V. (2010). Behavior Control as Subject Regulation. Moscow, Institut psikhologii RAN Press. (In Russian)

Sergienko, E. A., Znakov, V. V., Kharlamenkova, N. E. (2018). Individual subject in psychology. In: A. L. Zhuravlev, E. A. Sergienko (eds). Razrabotka Poniatii Sovremennoi Psikhologii (pp. 63–115). Moscow, Institut psikhologii RAN Press. (In Russian)

Silver, C. A., Tatler, B. W., Chakravarthi, R., Timmermans B. (2021). Social Agency as a continuum. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28 (2), 434–453. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01845-1

Vetrova, I. I. (2011). Correlation of behavior control, coping and psychological defenses. In: A. L. Zhuravlev, E. A. Sergienko (eds). Stress, Vygoranie, Sovladanie v Sovremennom Kontekste (pp. 275–295). Moscow, Institut psikhologii RAN Press. (In Russian)

Vetrova, I. I. (2016). Behavior control as a factor proactive coping in adolescence. In: A. L. Zhuravlev, E. A. Sergienko, N. V. Tarabrina, N. E. Kharlamenkova (eds.). Psikhologiia Povsednevnogo i Travmaticheskogo Stressa: Ugrozy, posledstviia i sovladanie (pp. 419–440). Moscow, Institut psikhologii RAN Press. (In Russian)

Vilenskaia, G. A. (2007). Environmental and genetic influences on behavior control in early human being’s ontogenesis. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 28 (4), 52–63. (In Russian)

Vilenskaia, G. A. (2009). Regulation of behavior at an early age. In: A. L. Zhuravlev, E. A. Sergienko, A. V. Karpov (eds.). Psikhologiia Segodnia: Teoriia, obrazovanie i praktika (pp. 70–86). Moscow, Institut psikhologii RAN Press. (In Russian)

Znakov, V. V. (2014). Theoretical foundations of psychology of understanding of a multi-dimensional world. Voprosy Psikhologii, 4, 16–29. (In Russian)

Znakov, V. V. (2016). Psychology of Understanding the Human World. Moscow, Institut psikhologii RAN Press. (In Russian)

Znakov, V. V. (2021). Psychology of the Possible: A new research direction of understanding. Moscow, Institut psikhologii RAN Press. https://doi.org/10.38098/mng.2021.12.48.001 (In Russian)

Znakov, V. V., Sergienko, E. A. (2018). Andrei Vladimirovich Brushlinskii: A life devoted to science. Metodologiia i Istoriia Psikhologii, 2, 5–21. https://doi.org/10.7868/S1819265318020012 (In Russian)