Semantics of life models in the information field of social networks

Authors

  • Svetlana Kostromina St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
  • Maria Odintsova St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2021.102

Abstract

In the context of the rapid development of the information environment, a person’s life path, identity, and the living space of an individual are not only presented in real life, but also in the virtual world, as well as in augmented reality. The mixing of virtual and real spaces cannot but affect the daily life of young people. This article attempts to describe and structure the elements of life models as fragments of a life scenario, broadcast through communities in social networks. The social network VKontakte has become a meaningful field for analysis as it is the most popular and frequently used online platform in the information space for the purpose of transmitting interesting and relevant information among Russian peers. The starting point of the study was the assumption that the content of social network posts describing the spheres of life can serve as a basis for building elements of life models broadcast on the Internet. The research consisted of several stages: preparatory (questioning young people about their preferred Internet content) and the main one (semantic and content analysis of the content of social networks). The sample of the preparatory stage was 110 respondents, the average age was 22 years (SD=2.8). The main sample consisted of over 200,000 posts from the top 20 social media communities (with an average of 4 million subscribers, with entertainment and non-themed content) over the past 2 years. With the help of special program codes and computer programs, the posts devoted to the most significant spheres of human activity were analyzed. It was found that the most popular marker words denoting areas of life in posts are work, relationships, and family. The data of automated semantic and content analysis showed that most often, through posts in communities, a model of an active and purposeful person is declared. This is an individual who is ready for action, flexible, mobile with respect to work and self-development, but conservative in regard to building family relationships. The results obtained confirm the assumption that the characteristics of the components of life models are presented most vividly in the posts of Internet communities, are actively broadcast and have their own characteristics. The results of the research data can contribute to the study of the main mechanisms of transmission between contemporaries of characteristics of behavior in real life, values and information through Internet content, as well as the work of practicing psychologists when referring to the profile on social networks or preferred client communities.

Keywords:

life models, social networks, intra-generational transmission, youth, Internet content, semantic space

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

Author Biography

Svetlana Kostromina, St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

д-р психол. наук

References

Литература

Костромина С.Н., Гришина Н.В., Зиновьева Е.В., Москвичева Н.Л. Жизненная модель как конструкт изучения жизненного сценария личности // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Психология. 2018. Т. 8, No 4. С. 341–357. https://doi.org/ 10.21638/11701/spbu16.2018.403

Костромина С.Н. Жизненные модели современной российской молодежи // Жизненное пространство в психологии: Теория и феноменология: сборник статей / под ред. Н.В.Гришиной, С.Н.Костроминой. СПб.: Изд-во С.-Петерб. ун-та, 2020. С. 223–247.

Головаха Е.И., Кроник А.А. Психологическое время личности. М.: Смысл, 2008.

Нуркова В.В., Днестровская М.В., Михайлова К.С. Культурный жизненный сценарий как динамическая семантическая структура (ре)организации индивидуального жизненного опыта [Электронный документ] // Психологические исследования. 2012. Т. 5, No 25. С. 2. URL: http://psystudy. ru/index.php/num/2012v5n25/734-nourkova25.html (дата обращения: 30.10.2020).

Дивисенко К.С. (Авто)биографический нарратив как коммуникативное действие и репре- зентация жизненного мира // Социологический журнал. 2011. No 1. С. 36–52.

Зайцева Ю. Е. Я-нарратив как инструмент конструирования идентичности: экзистенциально-нарративный подход // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Психология. 2016. Вып. 1. С. 118–136.

Трегубенко И.А. Историческая память в контексте субъективной картины жизненного пути личности: автореф. дис. ... канд. психол. наук. СПб., 2013.

Москвичева Н.Л., Реан А.А., Костромина С.Н., Гришина Н.В., Зиновьева Е.В. Жизненные модели молодых людей: представления о будущей семье и модели, транслируемой родителями // Психологическая наука и образование. 2019. Т. 24, No 3. С. 5–18. https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2019240301

Kostromina S.N., Grishina N.V., Moskvicheva N.L., Zinovyeva E.V. Commitment to Generation Subculture As a Factor of Building a Life Scenario // The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences / published by the Future Academy. 2020. Vol.LXIV. P. 267–275.

Чигрина Н.В., Жупник О.Н. Роль и место ценностных и социально-профессиональных ориентаций в системе жизненного самоопределения молодежи // Ученые записки Крымского федерального университета имени В.И.Вернадского. Социология. Педагогика. Психология. 2015. Т. 1 (67), No 4. С. 56–63.

Отчет: Исследование Gen Z, основанное на Criteo Shopper story [Электронный документ]. URL: https://www.criteo.com/ru/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2018/07/2018-Gen-Z-Report-RU.pdf (дата обращения: 20.10.2020).

Smith A. Why Americans use social media [Электронный документ] // Pew Internet & American Life Project. 2011. URL: http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Why-Americans-Use-Social-Media.aspx (дата обращения: 08.08.2020).

Obar J.A. Canadian advocacy 2.0: An analysis of social media adoption and perceived affordances by advocacy groups looking to advance activism in Canada // Canadian Journal of Communication. 2014. Vol. 39. P. 211–233.

Социальные сети в России, осень 2016. Цифры, тренды, прогнозы // Adlndex.ru. 2016. 8 декабря. URL: https://adindex.ru/publication/analitics/100380/2016/12/8/156545.phtml (дата обращения: 20.06.2020).

Войскунский А.Е., Евдокименко А.С., Федунина Н.Ю. Сетевая и реальная идентичность: сравнительное исследование // Журнал Высшей школы экономики. 2013. Т. 10, No 2. С. 98–121.

Kerckhove D.de, Almeida C.M.de. What is a digital persona? // Technoetic arts. 2013. Vol. 11. P. 277–287.

Марцинковская Т.Д. Современная психология — вызовы транзитивности [Электронный документ] // Психологические исследования. 2015. Т. 8, No 42. С. 1. URL: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/ num/2015v8n42/1168-martsinkovskaya42.html (дата обращения: 29.08.2020).

Пользователи стали чаще лайкать и сидеть в соцсетях с компьютеров [Электронный документ] // РБК. URL: https://www.rbc.ru/technology_and_media/16/04/2020/5e98175d9a7947beb10bf01d (дата обращения: 13.08.2020).

Абашев В.В., Печищев И.М. Городские сетевые издания как агенты урбанизации // Знак: проблемное поле медиаобразования. 2018. No 4 (30). С. 201–214.

Костромина С.Н., Одинцова М.М. Контент социальных сетей и блогов как семантическое пространство исследования жизненных моделей молодежи // Ананьевские чтения — 2019: Психология обществу, государству, политике, материалы международной научной конференции. Изд-во С.-Петерб. ун-та, 2019. С. 344–345.

Azucar D., Marengo D., Settanni M. Predicting the Big 5 personality traits from digital footprints on social media: A meta-analysis // Personality and Individual Differences. 2018. No. 124. P. 150–159. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.12.018.


References

Kostromina S.N., Grishina N.V., Zinovieva E.V., Moskvicheva N.L. Life model as a construct for studying the life scenario of personality. Vestnik of Saint-Petersburg University. Psihology, 2018, vol. 8 (4), pp. 341–357. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu16.2018.403. (In Russian)

Kostromina S.N. Life models of modern Russian youth. In: Grishina N.V., Kostromina S.N. (eds). Life Space in Psychology: Theory and Phenomenology. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg State University Press, 2020, pp. 223–247. (In Russian)

Golovaha E.I., Kronek A.A. Psychologic time of person. Мoscow, Smysl Publ., 2008. (In Russian)

Nourkova V.V., Dnestrovskaya M.V., Mikhailova K. S. Cultural life script as a dynamic semantic structure of autobiographical experience (re)organization. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniia, 2012, vol. 5, no. 25, p. 2. Available at: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2012v5n25/734-nourkova25.html (accessed: 30.10.2020). (In Russian)

Divisenko K. S. The concept of lifeworld in Jürgen Habermas’ social theory: autobiographical writing as communicative action. Sociol. Zhurnal, 2011, no. 1, pp. 36–52. (In Russian)

Zaitseva J. Self-narrative as a tool for constructing identity: an existential-narrative approach. Vestnik of Saint-Petersburg University. Psihology, 2016, vol. 1, pp. 118–136. (In Russian)

Tregubenko I.A. Historical memory in the context of the subjective picture of a person’s life path. Abstract of PhD thesis. St. Petersburg, 2013. (In Russian)

Moskvicheva N.L., Rean A.A., Kostromina S.N., Grishina N.V., Zinovieva E.V. Life Models in Young People: Ideas of Future Family and Impacts of Parental Models. Psikhologicheskaia nauka i obrazovanie, 2019, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 5–18. https:/doi.org/10.17759/ pse.2019240301 (In Russian)

Kostromina S.N., Grishina N.V., Moskvicheva N.L., Zinovieva E.V. Commitment to Generation Subculture as a Factor of Building a Life Scenario. The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences, published by the Future Academy, 2020, vol. LXIV, pp. 267–275.

Chigrina N.V., Zhupnik O.N. Role and place of value and socio-professional orientations in the system of life self-determination of young people. Uchenye zapiski Krymskogo federal’nogo universiteta imeni V.I.Vernadskogo. Sotsiologiia. Pedagogika. Psikhologiia, 2015, vol. 1 (67), no. 4, pp. 56–63.

Report: Gen Z Study Based on Criteo Shopper Story. Available at: https://www.criteo.com/ru/wpcontent/uploads/sites/10/2018/07/2018-Gen-Z-Report-RU.pdf (accessed: 20.10.2020) (In Russian)

Smith A. Why Americans use social media. Pew Internet & American Life Project, 2011. Available at: http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Why-Americans-Use-Social-Media.aspx (accessed: 08.08.2020).

Obar J.A.Canadian advocacy 2.0: An analysis of social media adoption and perceived affordances by advocacy groups looking to advance activism in Canada. Canadian Journal of Communication, 2014, vol. 39, pp. 211–233.

Social media in Russia, autumn 2016. Figures, trends, forecasts. AdIndex.ru. Available at: https:// adindex.ru/publication/analitics/100380/2016/12/8/156545.phtml. (accessed: 20.06.2020). (In Russian).

Vozhunsky A.E., Evdokimenko A. S., Fedunina N.U. Network and Real Identity: Comparative Study. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2013, vol. 10, pp. 98–121. (In Russian)

de Kerckhove D., de Almeida C.M. What is a digital persona? Technoetic arts, 2013, vol. 11, pp. 277–287.

Martsinkovskaya T.D. Modern psychology — challenges of transitivity. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniia, 2015, vol. 8, no. 42, p. 1. Available at: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2015v8n42/1168-martsinkovskaya42.html (accessed: 29.08.2020). (In Russian)

Users began to like and sit on social networks more often from computers. RBK. Available at: https://www.rbc.ru/technology_and_media/16/04/2020/5e98175d9a7947beb10bf01d (accessed: 13.08.2020). (In Russian)

Abashev V.V., Pechischev I.M. City network publications as agents of urbanization. Znak: problemnoe pole mediaobrazovaniia, 2018, no. 4 (30), pp. 201–214. (In Russian)

Kostromina S.N., Odintsova M.M. The content of social networks and blogs as a semantic space for studying the life models of youth. Anan’evskie chteniia — 2019: Psikhologiia obshchestvu, gosudarstvu, politike materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii. Saint Petersburg University Press, 2019, pp. 344–345.

Azucar D., Marengo D., Settanni M. Predicting the Big 5 personality traits from digital footprints on social media: A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 2018, no. 124, pp. 150–159. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.12.018

Published

2021-04-14

How to Cite

Kostromina, S., & Odintsova, M. (2021). Semantics of life models in the information field of social networks. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology, 11(1), 24–47. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2021.102

Issue

Section

Empirical and Experimental Research