Shared leadership and mental models’ compatibility as predictors of work group resilience

Authors

  • Nikolay Lepekhin St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9160-0519
  • Olga Ilyina St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8477-2507
  • Vladimir Kruglov St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8282-5476
  • Marina Kruglova St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2024.407

Abstract

In a turbulent business environment, the problem arises of ensuring the resilience at work in order to cope with unexpected threats, restore productivity, proactively overcome risks and variability of work processes, gaps in coordination of actions, and create the potential for advanced development based on anticipation. Against the backdrop of extensive research into individual and organizational resilience resources, there has been little research into group resilience factors, among which shared leadership and the compatibility of mental models of group members stand out. Objective: to evaluate the contributions of shared leadership and mental model compatibility as predictors of group resilience. Hypotheses: shared leader- ship and compatibility of members’ mental models have a positive effect on group resilience. Sample: 213 employees of Russian organizations. Methods: Team Resilience Scale; Shared Leadership Inventory in Teams (SPLIT); mental model compatibility scale. Analysis: normal distribution test, correlation (Pearson) and regression analysis; structural equation modeling (AMOS). Results: interrelations between indicators of shared leadership and compatibility of mental models with indicators of group resilience were found (0.43–0.77, padj < 0.01). Predictors of group resilience are indicators of shared leadership (in relationships, in change, and in external communications), as well as a general indicator of the compatibility of mental models. The compatibility of mental models does not have a significant direct effect on the resilience of groups, but at the same time it has a positive effect on resilience through shared leadership — 0.69, which plays the role of a mediator. Shared leadership has a direct positive effect on group resilience — 0.92. The impact of mental model compatibility on resilience occurs when shared leadership emerges from group dynamics, allowing a shared mental model to be used for teamwork. Shared leadership is a priority that interventions should focus on to develop teams in organizations.

Keywords:

organizational resilience resources, team resilience, shared leadership, compatibility of mental models

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Астапенко Е. Е., Круглова М. А., Лепехин Н. Н., Маничев С. А., Федоров С. И. Развитие рабочих команд на основе проактивных интервенций в циклах выполнения задач // Петербургский психологический журнал. 2021. № 36. С. 1–54.

Лепехин Н. Н., Круглов В. Г., Круглова М. А., Тихомирова Н. В., Яшина М. А. Диспозиционные предикторы конфликтоустойчивости студентов // Социальная психология и общество. 2023. Т. 14, № 1. С. 92–110. https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2023140106

Лепехин Н. Н., Прозорова М. П. Разделяемое лидерство и ментальные модели как антецеденты устойчивости рабочих команд // Труды ХIV Евразийского научного форума: сборник научных статей из материалов ХIV Евразийского научного форума. СПб., 15–16 декабря 2022 года / науч. ред. М. Ю. Спирина. Ч. II. СПб.: Университет при МПА ЕврАзЭС, 2023. С. 157–164.

Лепехин Н. Н. Разделяемое лидерство как фактор устойчивости команды // Петербургский психологический журнал. 2023. № 42. С. 22–68.

Лисовская А. Ю., Кучеров Д. Г., Петрова-Савченко А. Н., Соколов Д. Н., Алканова О. Г. Устойчивое управление человеческими ресурсами: новый взгляд на управление сотрудниками // Менеджмент в России и за рубежом. 2022. № 3. С. 97–102.

Стоянович М. Разделяемое лидерство как предиктор настроек работы (job crafting) // Психология XXI века — 2023: наука как свобода и творчество. Сборник тезисов участников XXVII Международной научной конференции молодых ученых 10–12 мая 2023 года / под ред. А. В. Шаболтас. СПб.: Скифия-принт, 2023. С. 290–291.

Чигрина А. А., Багратиони К. А., Нестик Т. А. Разработка теоретической модели групповой жизнеспособности // Организационная психология. 2020. Т. 10, № 2. С. 151–171.

Braun M. T., Kozlowski S. W. J., Kuljanin G. Multilevel theory, methods, and analyses in management // M. Hitt (ed.). The Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management. New York: Oxford University Press, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.227

Bowers C., Kreutzer C., Cannon-Bowers J., Lamb J. Team resilience as a second-order emergent state: A theoretical model and research directions // Frontiers in Psychology. 2017. Vol. 8. Art. no. 1360.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01360

Brykman K. M., King D. D. A resource model of team resilience capacity and learning // Group & Organization Management. 2021. Vol. 46, no. 4. P. 737–772. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011211018008

Chen Yi., Zhang Yi. Fostering resilience in new venture teams: The role of behavioral and affective integration // Group & Organization Management. 2021. Vol. 46, no. 4. P. 773–816. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011211033164

Collier J. E. Applied structural equation modeling using AMOS: Basic to advanced techniques. New York: Routledge, 2020. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003018414

Duchek S. Organizational resilience: A capability-based conceptualization // Business Research. 2020. Vol. 13, no. 1. P. 215–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-019-0085-7

Ensley M. D., Hmieleski K. M., Pearce C. L. The importance of vertical and shared leadership within new venture top management teams: Implications for the performance of startups // The Leadership Quarterly. 2006. Vol. 17, no. 1. P. 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.02.002

Galy A., Chênevert D., Fouquereau E., Groulx P. Toward a new conceptualization of resilience at work as a meta-construct? // Frontiers in Psychology. 2023. Vol. 14. Art. no. 1211538. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1211538

Garmezy N., Masten A. S., Tellegen A. The study of stress and competence in children: A building block for developmental psychopathology // Child Development. 1984. Vol. 55. P. 97–111. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129837

Gichuhi J. M. Shared leadership and organizational resilience: A systematic literature review // International Journal of Organizational Leadership. 2021. Vol. 10, special iss. P. 67–88. https://doi.org/10.33844/ijol.2021.60536

Hartwig A., Clarke S., Johnson S., Willis S. Workplace team resilience: A systematic review and conceptual development // Organizational Psychology Review. 2020. Vol. 10, no. 3–4. P. 169–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386620919476

Kozlowski S. W. J., Bell B. S. Advancing team learning: Process mechanisms, knowledge outcomes, and implications // L. Argote, J. Levine (eds). Oxford Handbook of Organizational Learning. New York: Oxford University Press, 2020. P. 195–230.

Kozlowski S. W., Chao G. T. Unpacking team process dynamics and emergent phenomena: Challenges, conceptual advances, and innovative methods // The American Psychologist. 2018. Vol. 73, no. 4. P. 576-592. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000245

Leipold B., Greve W. Resilience: A conceptual bridge between coping and development // European Psychologist. 2009. Vol. 14, no. 1. P. 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.14.1.40

Masten A. S. Resilience of children in disasters: A multisystem perspective // International Journal of Psychology. 2021. Vol. 56, no. 1. P. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12737

Mohammed S., Rico R., Alipour K. Team cognition at a crossroad: Toward conceptual integration and network configurations // Academy of Management Annals. 2021. Vol. 15, no. 2. P. 455–501. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0159

Raetze S., Duchek S., Maynard M. T., Kirkman B. L. Resilience in organizations: An integrative multilevel review and editorial introduction // Group & Organization Management. 2021. Vol. 46, no. 4. P. 607–656. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011211032129

Raetze S., Duchek S., Maynard M. T., Wohlgemuth M. Resilience in organization-related research: An integrative conceptual review across disciplines and levels of analysis // The Journal of Applied Psychology. 2022. Vol. 107, no. 6. P. 867–897. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000952

Rapp, T. L., Mathieu, J. E. Team and individual influences on members’ identification and performance per membership in multiple team membership arrangements // Journal of Applied Psychology. 2019. Vol. 104, no. 3. P. 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000344

Scott-Young C. M., Georgy M., Grisinger A. Shared leadership in project teams: An integrative multi-level conceptual model and research agenda // International Journal of Project Management. 2019. Vol. 37. P. 565–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.02.002

Sharma S., Sharma S. K. Team resilience: scale development and validation // Vision. 2016. Vol. 20. P. 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262916628952

van Rensburg J. J., Santos C. M., de Jong S. B., Uitdewilligen S. The five-factor perceived shared mental model scale: A consolidation of items across the contemporary literature // Frontiers in Psychology. 2022. Vol. 12. P. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.784200

van Rensburg J. J., Santos C. M., de Jong S. B. Sharing time and goals in dyads: How shared tenure and goal interdependence influence perceived shared mental models // Team Performance Management. 2023. Vol. 29, no. 3–4. P. 202–221. https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-12-2022-0086

Zautra A. J., Reich J. W. Resilience: the meaning, methods, and measures of a fundamental characteristic of human adaptation // S. Folkman (ed.) Oxford Handbook of Stress, Health, and Coping. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011. P. 173–185.

Wu Q., Cormican K. Shared leadership and team effectiveness: An investigation of whether and when in engineering design teams // Frontiers in Psychology. 2021. Vol. 11. P. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.569198


References

Astapenko, Ye. Ye., Kruglova, M. A., Lepekhin, N. N., Manichev, S. A., Fedorov, S. I. (2021). Development of working teams on the basis of proactive interventions in the task solution’s cycles. Peterburgskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 36, 1–54. (In Russian)

Braun, M. T., Kozlowski, S. W. J., Kuljanin, G. (2021). Multilevel theory, methods, and analyses in management. In: M. Hitt (ed.). The Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management. New York, Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.227

Bowers, C., Kreutzer, C., Cannon-Bowers, J., & Lamb, J. (2017). Team resilience as a second-order emergent state: A theoretical model and research directions. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1360. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01360

Brykman, K. M., King, D. D. (2021). A resource model of team resilience capacity and learning. Group & Organization Management, 46 (4), 737–772. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011211018008

Chen, Yi., Zhang, Yi. (2021). Fostering resilience in new venture teams: The role of behavioral and affective integration. Group & Organization Management, 46 (4), 773–816. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011211033164

Chigrina, A. A., Bagrationi, K. A., Nestik, T. A. (2020). Development of the theoretical model of group resilience. Organizatsionnaia psikhologiia, 10 (2), 151–171. (In Russian)

Collier, J. E. (2020). Applied structural equation modeling using AMOS: Basic to advanced techniques. New York, Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-12-2022-0086

Duchek, S. (2020). Organizational resilience: A capability-based conceptualization. Business Research, 13 (1), 215–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-019-0085-7

Ensley, M. D., Hmieleski, K. M., Pearce, C. L. (2006). The importance of vertical and shared leadership within new venture top management teams: Implications for the performance of startups. The Leadership Quarterly, 17 (3), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.02.002

Galy, A., Chênevert, D., Fouquereau, E., Groulx, P. (2023). Toward a new conceptualization of resilience at work as a meta-construct? Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1211538. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1211538

Garmezy, N., Masten, A. S., Tellegen, A. (1984). The study of stress and competence in children: A building block for developmental psychopathology. Child Development, 55, 97–111.

Gichuhi, J. M. (2021). Shared leadership and organizational resilience: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 10, 67–88. https://doi.org/10.33844/ijol.2021.60536

Hartwig, A., Clarke, S., Johnson, S., Willis, S. (2020). Workplace team resilience: A systematic review and conceptual development. Organizational Psychology Review, 10 (3–4), 169–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386620919476

Kozlowski, S. W. J., Bell, B. S. (2020). Advancing team learning: Process mechanisms, knowledge outcomes, and implications. In: L. Argote, J. Levine (eds). Oxford Handbook of Organizational Learning (pp. 195–230). New York, Oxford University Press.

Kozlowski, S. W. J., Chao, G. T. (2018). Unpacking team process dynamics and emergent phenomena: Challenges, conceptual advances, and innovative methods. American Psychologist, 73 (4), 576–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000245

Leipold, B., Greve, W. (2009). Resilience: A conceptual bridge between coping and development. European Psychologist, 14 (1), 40–50.

Lepekhin, N. N., Kruglov, V. G., Kruglova, M. A., Tikhomirova, N. V., Yashina, M. A. (2023). Dispositional predictors of students’ conflict resistance . Sotsial’naia psikhologiia i obshchestvo, 14 (1), 92–110. https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2023140106 (In Russian)

Lepekhin, N. N., Prozorova, M. P. (2023). Shared leadership and mental models as antecedents of working teams’ resilience. In: M. Yu. Spirina (sci. ed.). Trudy XIV Evraziiskogo nauchnogo foruma: sbornik nauchnykh statei iz materialov XIV Evraziiskogo nauchnogo foruma. Sankt-Peterburg, 15–16 dekabria 2022 goda. Vol. II. (pp. 157–164). St. Petersburg, University under the Interparliamentery Assembly of EURASEC Press. (In Russian)

Lepekhin, N. N. (2023). Shared leadership as team resilience’s factor. Peterburgskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 42, 22–68.

Lisovskaya, A. Yu., Kucherov, D. G., Petrova-Savchenko, A. N., Sokolov, D. N., Alkanova, O. G. (2022). Stable management of human resources: New view on employees’ management. Menedzhment v Rossii i za rubezhom, 3, 97–102. (In Russian)

Masten, A. S. (2021). Resilience of children in disasters: A multisystem perspective. International Journal of Psychology, 56 (1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12737

Mohammed, S., Rico, R., Alipour, K. (2021). Team cognition at a crossroad: Toward conceptual integration and network configurations. Academy of Management Annals, 15 (2), 455–501. https://doi.org10.5465/annals.2018.0159

Raetze, S., Duchek, S., Maynard, M. T., Kirkman, B. L. (2021). Resilience in organizations: An integrative multilevel review and editorial introduction. Group & Organization Management, 46 (4), 607–656. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011211032129

Raetze, S., Duchek, S., Maynard, M. T., Wohlgemuth, M. (2022). Resilience in organization-related research: An integrative conceptual review across disciplines and levels of analysis. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 107 (6), 867–897. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000952

Rapp, T. L., Mathieu, J. E. (2019). Team and individual influences on members’ identification and performance per membership in multiple team membership arrangements. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104 (3), 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000344

Scott-Young, C. M., Georgy, M., Grisinger, A. (2019). Shared leadership in project teams: An integrative multi-level conceptual model and research agenda. International Journal of Project Management, 37, 565–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.02.002

Sharma, S., Sharma, S. K. (2016). Team resilience: Scale development and validation. Vision, 20, 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262916628952

Stoyanovich, M. (2023). Shared leadership as a predictor of job crafting. In: A. V. Shaboltas (ed.). Psikhologiia XXI veka — 2023: nauka kak svoboda i tvorchestvo: sbornik tezisov uchastnikov XXVII Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii molodykh uchenykh, Sankt-Peterburg, 10–12 maya 2023 goda (pp. 290–291). St. Petersburg, Skifiia-print Publ. (In Russian)

van Rensburg, J. J., Santos, C. M., de Jong, S. B. (2023). Sharing time and goals in dyads: How shared tenure and goal interdependence influence perceived shared mental models. Team Performance Management, 29 (3–4), 202–221. https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-12-2022-0086

van Rensburg, J. J., Santos, C. M., de Jong, S. B., Uitdewilligen, S. (2022). The five-factor perceived shared mental model scale: A consolidation of items across the contemporary literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.784200

Zautra, A. J., Reich, J. W. (2011). Resilience: The meaning, methods, and measures of a fundamental characteristic of human adaptation. In: S. Folkman (ed.). Oxford Handbook of Stress, Health, and Coping (pp. 173–185). New York, Oxford University Press.

Wu, Q., Cormican, K. (2021). Shared leadership and team effectiveness: An investigation of whether and when in engineering design teams. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.569198

Downloads

Published

2025-02-21

How to Cite

Lepekhin, N., Ilyina, O., Kruglov , V., & Kruglova , M. (2025). Shared leadership and mental models’ compatibility as predictors of work group resilience. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology, 14(4), 673–692. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2024.407

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 4 (2024)

Section

Empirical and Experimental Research

License

Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.