Features of subjective well-being and coping strategies in women during periods of soft and hard social transitivity

Authors

  • Vasilisa Orestova Russian State University for the Humanities, 6, Miusskaya pl., Moscow, 125047, Russian Federation
  • Svetlana Zolotareva Russian State University for the Humanities, 6, Miusskaya pl., Moscow, 125047, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2023.406

Abstract

The relevance of the study is determined by large-scale, overlapping, multidirectional changes throughout the world over the past few years, which create a situation of social transitivity with heterogeneous periods. The concept of social transitivity is analyzed, in which heterogeneous periods are distinguished. The aim of the work is an empirical study of the specifics of subjective well-being, psychological defenses and coping strategies in women in situations of hard and soft social transitivity. The study involved 318 women (N=318), living in different cities of Russia aged from 26 to 55 years. The study was conducted in 2022 in two stages — during periods of soft and hard transitivity. The results obtained prove the importance for subjective well-being, psychological defenses and the choice of coping strategies for experiencing a person’s current situation as a crisis. The specificity of the links between subjective well-being and psychological defenses and coping strategies has been revealed both for groups with different experiences of the current situation and for different periods of transitivity. It is shown that rigid transitivity erases almost all differences between those who assess the current situation of social transitivity as a crisis and those who for whom it is not. It has been established that the greatest contribution to the maintenance of subjective well-being is made by the psychological defense “denial”, and these connections have their own specifics in two groups for different periods of transitivity. Few links were found between coping strategies and subjective well-being, among them positive links between the coping strategy “positive reformulation and personal growth” and subjective well-being in a group of women who assess the situation as a crisis, and the number of these links decreases in a situation of rigid transitivity. The results obtained contribute to the development of the problem of the psychological well-being of an individual in a situation of social and personal transitivity

Keywords:

subjective well-being, coping strategies, social transitivity, personal transitivity, rigid transitivity, fluid transitivity

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Куфтяк Е. В. Изучение психологических защит с помощью методики «Опросник стилей защит»: связь с копингом и психологическим благополучием (на примере юношеского возраста) // Методологические и прикладные проблемы медицинской (клинической) психологии: К 90-летию Ю. Ф. Полякова. М.: Сам полиграфист, 2018. С. 117–127.

Леонтьев Д. А., Рассказова Е. И., Тараненко О. В., Кошелева Н. В. Изменение субъективного благополучия в ситуации пандемии: роль копинг-стратегий и реакции на пандемию // Психологиястресса и совладающего поведения: устойчивость и изменчивость отношений, личности, группы в эпоху неопределенности: материалы VI Международной научной конференции (г. Кострома, 22–24 сентября 2022 г.) / науч. ред. Т. Л. Крюкова, М. В. Сапоровская, С. А. Хазова. Кострома: Костромской государственный университет, 2022. С. 9–13.

Марцинковская Т. Д. Личностные границы пространства и времени в ситуации депривации по COVID-19 // Вопросы психологии. 2020. Т. 66, № 4. С. 104–114.

Марцинковская Т. Д. Новая методология исследования транзитивности жизненного пространства изменяющейся личности // Новые психологические исследования. 2021. Т. 1, № 2. С. 31–45. https://doi.org/10.51217/npsyresearch_2021_01_02_02

Марцинковская Т. Д. Динамика психологического благополучия в ситуации транзитивности и пандемии // Новые психологические исследования. 2022. Т. 2, № 2. С. 88–102. https://doi.org/10.51217/npsyresearch_2022_02_02_05

Марцинковская Т. Д., Карпук В. А. Адаптация опросника погружения в виртуальное пространство: подход к проблеме // Новые психологические исследования. 2023. Т. 3, № 1. С. 93–112.

Полева Н. С. Психология транзитивности: виды пространства и психологический хронотоп // Вестник РГГУ. Сер. Психология. Педагогика. Образование. 2022. № 4. С. 14–29. https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6398-2022-4-14-29

Пилюгина Е. Р., Сулейманов Р. Ф. Методика измерения психологической защиты // Экспериментальная психология. 2020. Т. 13, № 2. С. 194–209. https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2020130213

Рассказова Е. И., Гордеева Т. О., Осин Е. Н. Копинг-стратегии в структуре деятельности и саморегуляции: психометрические характеристики и возможности применения методики COPE // Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. 2013. Т. 10, № 1. С. 82–118.

Рассказова Е. И., Леонтьев Д. А., Лебедева А. А. Пандемия как вызов субъективному благополучию: тревога и совладание // Консультативная психология и психотерапия. 2020. Т. 28, № 2. С. 90–108. https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2020280205

Шамионов Р. М., Бескова Т. В. Методика диагностики субъективного благополучия личности // Психологические исследования. 2018. Т. 11, № 60. С. 8. URL: https://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/article/download/277/561/565 (дата обращения: 20.02.2023).

Coroiu A., Moran C., Campbell T., Geller A. C. Barriers and facilitators of adherence to social distancing recommendations during COVID-19 among a large international sample of adults // PLoS ONE. 2020. Vol. 15 (10). Art. e0239795. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239795

Jovančeviс A., Miliсeviс N. Optimism-pessimism, conspiracy theories and general trust as factors contributing to COVID-19 related behavior — A cross-cultural study // Personality and Individual Differences. 2020. Vol. 167. Art. 110216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110216

Lazarević L., Purić D., Teovanovi P., Lukić P., Zupan Z., Knežević G. What drives us to be (ir)responsible for our health during the COVID-19 pandemic? The role of personality, thinking styles and conspiracy mentality // PsyArXiv Preprints. 2020. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/cgeuv

Zirenko M., Kornilova T., Qiuqi Z., Izmailova A. Personality regulation of decisions on physical distancing: Cross-cultural comparison (Russia, Azerbaijan, China) // Personality and Individual Differences. 2021. Vol. 170. Art. 110418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110418


References

Coroiu, A., Moran, C., Campbell, T., Geller, A. C. (2020). Barriers and facilitators of adherence to social distancing recommendations during COVID-19 among a large international sample of adults. PLoS ONE, 15 (10), e0239795. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239795

Jovančeviс, A., Miliсeviс, N. (2020) Optimism-pessimism, conspiracy theories and general trust as factors contributing to COVID-19 related behavior — A cross-cultural study. Personality and Individual Differences, 167, 110216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110216

Kuftyak, E. V. (2018). Studying psychological defenses using the “Questionnaire of Defense Styles”: Relationship with coping and psychological well-being (on the example of adolescence). Methodological and Applied Issues of Medical (Clinical) Psychology: On the 90th anniversary of Yu. F. Polyakov: (pp. 117–127). Moscow, Sam poligrafist Publ. (In Russian)

Lazarević, L., Purić, D., Teovanović, P., Lukić, P., Zupan, Z., Knežević, G. (2020). What drives us to be (ir)responsible for our health during the COVID-19 pandemic? The role of personality, thinking styles and conspiracy mentality. PsyArXiv Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/cgeuv

Leontiev, D. A., Rasskazova, E. I., Taranenko, O. V., Kosheleva, N. V. (2022). Changes in subjective well-being during the pandemic: The role of coping strategies and pandemic response. In: T. L. Kryukova, M. V. Saporovskaya, S. A. Khazova (eds). Psikhologiia Stressa i Sovladaiushchego Povedeniia: Ustoichivost’ i Izmenchivost’ Otnoshenii, Lichnosti, Gruppy v Epokhu Neopredelennosti: materialy VI Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii (Kostroma, 22–24 sentiabria 2022 g.) (pp. 9–13). Kostroma, Kostroma State University Press. (In Russian)

Martsinkovskaya, T. D. (2020). Personal boundaries of space and time in the situation of deprivation due to COVID-19. Voprosy Psikhologii, 66 (4), 104–114. (In Russian)

Martsinkovskaya, T. D. (2021). A new methodology for studying the transitivity of the life space of a changing personality. Novye Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniia, 1 (2), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.51217/npsyresearch_2021_01_02_02 (In Russian)

Martsinkovskaya, T. D. (2022). Dynamics of psychological well-being in the situation of transitivity and pandemic. Novye Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniia, 2 (2), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.51217/npsyresearch_2022_02_02_05 (In Russian)

Martsinkovskaya, T. D., Karpuk, V. A. (2023). Adaptation of the immersion questionnaire in virtual space: An approach to the problem. Novye Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniia, 3 (1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.51217/npsyresearch_2023_03_01_05 (In Russian)

Pilyugina, E. R., Suleymanov, R. F. (2020). Method for measuring psychological defense. Eksperimental’naia Psikhologiia, 13 (2), 194–209. https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2020130213 (In Russian)

Poleva, N. S. (2022). Psychology of transitivity: Types of space and psychological chronotope. Vestnik RGGU. Ser. Psikhologiia. Pedagogika. Obrazovanie, 4, 14–29. https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6398-2022-4-14-29 (In Russian)

Rasskazova, E. I., Gordeeva, T. O., Osin, E. N. (2013). Coping strategies in the structure of activity and self-regulation: Psychometric characteristics and application possibilities of the COPE questionnaire. Psikhologiia. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 10 (1), 82–118. (In Russian)

Rasskazova, E. I., Leontiev, D. A., Lebedeva, A. A. (2020). Pandemic as a challenge to subjective well-being: Anxiety and coping. Konsul’tativnaia Psikhologiia i Psikhoterapiia, 28 (2), 90–108. https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2020280205 (In Russian)

Shamionov, R. M., Beskova, T. V. (2018). Method for diagnosing subjective well-being of an individual. Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniia, 11 (60), 8. Available at: https://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/article/download/277/561/565 (accessed: 10.09.2023). (In Russian)

Zirenko, M., Kornilova, T., Qiuqi, Z., Izmailova, A. (2021). Personality regulation of decisions on physical distancing: Cross-cultural comparison (Russia, Azerbaijan, China). Personality and Individual Differences, 170, 110418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110418

Downloads

Published

2023-12-08

How to Cite

Orestova, V., & Zolotareva, S. (2023). Features of subjective well-being and coping strategies in women during periods of soft and hard social transitivity. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology, 13(4), 523–536. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2023.406

Issue

Vol. 13 No. 4 (2023)

Section

Empirical and Experimental Research

License

Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.