Actual tendencies of the methodology of the history of psychology in light of the philosophic and methodological problems of historiography
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2021.402Abstract
The article examines the features of the development of the history of psychology in light of the general trends in the development of historiography. The characteristics of historical knowledge as a whole are discussed, debated, and the problematic points in the development of historical science are highlighted. Questions are raised concerning the relationship between the history of science, in particular, the history of psychology and history as a science in general. Based on the material of domestic and foreign sources on the history of the development of historical science, the main trends of history as a branch of scientific knowledge are provided, as well as its features in view of the influence of postmodern trends, such as criticism of the historicist approach, rejection of the idea of the direction of the historical process, actualization of the ideas of historical relativism and the problem of correlating historical fact and its representation, a consequence of the “linguistic turn”. It is shown that the development of the history of psychology mainly occurs in accordance with trends in the development of historical science. There is a turn in the understanding and conceptualization of historical experience and historical fact and there is an awareness of the need to revise the boundaries of the subject of study and the focus of research, a gradual rejection of positivist tendencies and revolution in relation to the text as historical material. The article highlights the specific features of the history of psychology as a result of its integration into psychological science and the characteristics of the scientific community of historians of psychology. Also, due to the analysis of the trends in the development of Russian psychological science, it is indicated that the general direction of the nearest development both for the historical and psychological sciences, and for the history of psychology, is the awareness of the need to conceptualize such a phenomenon as context. Also, despite the dominance of positivist tendencies in Russian psychology, expressed first of all in the desire to search for patterns of the historical process (in this case, the process of development of psychological scientific knowledge), shifts were noted in understanding the need to expand the subject of research and search for new philosophical and methodological grounds.
Keywords:
history of psychology, philosophy of history, methodology of historiography
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Литература
Анкерсмит Ф.Р. История и тропология: взлет и падение метафоры / пер. с англ. М.Кукарцевой, Е.Коломоец, В.Катаевой. М.: Прогресс-Традиция, 2003.
Анкерсмит Ф.Р. Нарративная логика. Семантический анализ языка историков / пер. с англ. О.Гавришиной, А.Олейникова; под ред. Л.Б.Макеевой. М.: Идея-Пресс, 2003.
Арон Р. Избранное: Введение в философию истории / пер. с фр. И. А. Гобозова. М.: Пер Сэ; СПб.: Университетская книга, 2000.
Барт Р. Дискурс истории // Система моды: статьи по семиотике культуры / сост., пер. с фр. и вступ.ст. С.Зенкина. М.: Изд-во им. Сабашниковых, 2003. С. 427–441.
Баткин Л.М. Полемические заметки. М.: Наука, 1995.
Бахтин М.М. Собрание сочинений: в 7 т. Т. 6. Проблемы поэтики Достоевского. М.: Русские словари, 2002.
Блок М. Апология истории, или Ремесло историка / пер. с фр. Е.М.Лысенко; отв. ред., примеч. и вступ. ст. А.Я.Гуревича. 2-е изд., доп. М.: Наука, 1986.
Гавришина О.В. Историческая наука в ситуации «постмодерна». По материалам работы Ф.Р.Анкерсмита «Эффект реальности в трудах историков» (Ankersmit F.R.The reality effect in the writing of history. Аmsterdam etc.: Knkl. Nederl. Acad. Van wet. Noord-holl, 1988, 37 р. 1) // Социальные и гуманитарные науки. Отечественная и зарубежная литература. Сер. 5. История: Реферативный журнал. 1997. No 2. С. 49–70.
Гадамер Х.-Г. Истина и метод: Основы филос. герменевтики / пер. с нем.; общ. ред. и вступ. ст. Б.Н.Бессонова. М.: Прогресс, 1988.
Гришина Н.В. Проблема концептуализации контекста в современной психологии // Социальная психология и общество. 2018. Т. 9, No 3. С. 10–20. https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2018090302
Даймонд Дж. Ружья, микробы и сталь. История человеческих сообществ. М.: АСТ, 2003.
Джерджен К.Дж. Социальная психология как история // Социальная психология: саморефлексия маргинальности / ред.-сост. Е.В.Якимова. М.: ИНИОН РАН, 1995. C. 23–50.
Карицкий И.Н. Новейшая история российской психологии по страницам журнала «Методология и история психологии» (2006–2018 гг.) // Научные труды Московского гуманитарного университета. 2019. No 1. С. 134–147.
Коллингвуд Р.Дж. Идея истории. Автобиография / пер. и коммент. Ю.А.Асеева; ст. М.А.Кисселя; отв. ред.: И.С.Кон, М.А.Киссель; Академия наук СССР. М.: Наука, 1980.
Кольцова В.А. История психологии: Проблемы методологии. М.: Институт психологии РАН, 2008.
Кроче Б. Теория и история историографии / пер. с ит. И.М.Заславской. М.: Языки русской культуры, 1998.
Лосев А.Ф. Философия. Мифология. Культура. М.: Политиздат, 1991.
Лурия А.Р. Психоанализ как система монистической психологии // Психология и марксизм: сб. ст./ под ред. К.Н.Корнилова. Л.: Госиздат, 1925. С. 47–80.
Люк Х. История психологии: методология и методы // Ярославский педагогический вестник. 2017. No 5. С. 194–203.
Мазилов В.А. История психологии и философия психологии: необходимо взаимодействие // Вестник ВятГУ. 2014. No 2. С. 94–100.
Мироненко И.А. Биосоциальная проблема и становление глобальной психологии. М.: Институтпсихологии РАН, 2019.
Мироненко И.А., Журавлев А.Л. Биосоциальная проблема в контексте глобальной психологической науки: об универсальных характеристиках человека // Психологический журнал. 2019. Т. 40, No 6. С. 87–98.
Нестик Т.А., Журавлев А.Л., Юревич А.В. Прогноз развития психологической науки и практики к 2030 г. // Ярославский педагогический вестник. 2016. No 5. С. 177–192.
Поппер К.P. Нищета историцизма / пер. с англ. С. Кудриной. М.: Прогресс — VIA, 1993.
Прохоренко И.А. Основные направления зарубежной историографии Всеобщей истории (от древности до конца XX века). Тольятти: ТГУ, 2010.
Удальцов В.Г., Мрочко Л.В. Социально-философское осмысление истории: необходимость и значимость // Экономические и социально-гуманитарные исследования. 2017. No 2 (14). С. 49–54.
Филюшкин А.И. Постмодернистский вызов и его влияние на современную теорию исторической науки // Топос. Философско-культурологический журнал. 2000. No 3. С. 67–78.
Ярошевский М.Г. Проблемы детерминизма в психофизиологии XIX века. Душанбе, 1961.
Ярошевский М.Г. Историческая психология науки. СПб.: Изд-во Международного фонда истории науки, 1995.
Ankersmit F.R. The reality effect in the writing of history: the dynamics of historiographical topology. Noord-Hollandsche: Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, 1989.
Boring E.G. Sensation and perception in the history of experimental psychology. New York: Appleton-Century, 1942.
Boring E.G. A History of Experimental Psychology. New York: Century, 1929.
Danziger K. Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
Dussen W.J. van der., Ankersmit F.R. The reality effect in the writing of history. The dynamics of historiographical topology // BMGN — Low Countries Historical Review. 1994. No. 109 (3). P. 452–453.
Fukuyama F. The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press, 1992.
Leary D.E. Metaphors in the History of Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
Rutherford A. History’s mysteries demystified: Becoming a psychologist-historian // American journal of psychology. 2009. Vol. 122, no. 1. P. 117–129.
Spengler O. The Decline of the West. New York: Oxford UP, 1991.
Valsiner J. A guided science: history of psychology in the mirror of its making. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 2012.
Wertheimer M. A brief history of psychology. San Diego: Harcourt College Publishers, 2000.
Zhuravlev A.L., Mironenko I.A., Yurevich A.V. Psychological science in the global world // Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2018. Vol. 88, no. 5. P. 385–393.
References
Ankersmit, F.R. (1989). The Reality Effect in the Writing of History: The dynamics of historiographical topology. Noord-Hollandsche, Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen.
Ankersmit, F.R. (2003). History and Tropology: The Rise and Fall of Metaphor. Moscow, Progress-Traditsiia Publ. (In Russian)
Ankersmit, F.R. (2003). Narrative logic. A Semantic Analysis of the Historian’s Language. Moscow, Ideia-Press Publ. (In Russian)
Aron, R. (2000). Selected: Introduction to the Philosophy of History: An Essay on the Limits of Historical Objectivity (Introduction à la philosophie de l’histoire) . Moscow, Per Se; St. Petersburg, Universitetskaia kniga Publ.
Bart, R. (2003). The discourse of history. The fashion system: articles on semiotics of culture (pp. 427–441), ed., transl. from French, introd. by S.Zenkin. Moscow, Sabashnikovy Publ. (In Russian)
Batkin, L.M. (1995). Polemic notes. Moscow, Nauka Publ. (In Russian) Bakhtin, M.M. (2002). Collected works: in 7 vols. Vol. 6. Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. Moscow, Russkie slovari Publ. (In Russian)
Blok, M. (1986). An apology for history or the craft of a historian, transl. from French by E.M.Lysenko; execut. ed., notes and introd. by A.Ia. Gurevich. 2nd ed., suppl. Moscow, Nauka Publ. (In Russian)
Boring, E.G. (1929). A History of Experimental Psychology. New York, Century.
Boring, E.G. (1942). Sensation and perception in the history of experimental psychology. New York, Appleton- Century.
Collingwood, R.G. (1980). The Idea of History. Autobiography, transl. and comm. by Iu. A.Aseev; art. by M.A.Kissel’; execut. eds: I. S.Kon, M.A.Kissel’. Moscow, Nauka Publ. (In Russian)
Croce, B. (1998). Theory and history of historiography, transl. from Ital. by I.M.Zaslavskaia. Moscow, Yazyki russkoi kul’tury Publ. (In Russian
) Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. New York, Cambridge University Press.
Diamond, D.M. (2003). Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies. Moscow, AST Publ. (In Russian)
Dussen W.J. van der, Ankersmit F.R. (1994). The reality effect in the writing of history. The dynamics of historiographical topology. BMGN — Low Countries Historical Review, 109 (3), 452–453.
Filiushkin, A.I. (2000). Postmodern challenge and its impact on the modern theory of historical science. Topos. Filosofsko-kul’turologicheskii zhurnal, 3, 67–78. (In Russian)
Fukuyama F. (1992). The End of History and the Last Man. New York, Free Press. )
Gavrishina, O.V. (1997). Historical science in a “postmodern” situation. Based on the work of F.R.Ankersmit “The reality effect in the writing of history”. (Ankersmit F.R. The reality effect in the writing of history. Amsterdam etc.: Knkl. Nederl. Acad. Van wet. Noord-holl, 1988, 37 r. 1). Social’nye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya literatura. Ser. 5. Istoriya: Referativnyj zhurnal, 2, 49–70. (In Russian)
Gadamer, H.-G. (1988). Truth and Method, transl. from German; gen. ed., introd. by B.N.Bessonov. Moscow, Progress Publ. (In Russian)
Gergen, K.J. (1995). Social psychology as history. Social’naya psihologiya: samorefleksiya marginal’nosti (pp. 23–50), red.-sost. E.V.Yakimova. Moscow, INION RAN Press. (In Russian)
Grishina, N.V. (2018). The problem of conceptualizing context in modern psychology. Social’naia psihologiia i obshchestvo, 3 (9), 10–20. (In Russian)
Karitskii, I.N. (2019). The newest history of Russian psychology through the pages of the journal “Methodology and History of Psychology” (2006–2018 gg.). Nauchnye trudy Moskovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta, 1, 134–147. (In Russian)
Kol’tsova, V.A. (2008). The history of psychology: problems of methodology. Moscow, Institut psihologii RAN Press. (In Russian)
Leary, D.E. (1994). Metaphors in the History of Psychology. New York, Cambridge University Press.
Losev, A.F. (1991). Philosophy. Mythology. Culture. Moscow, Politizdat Publ. (In Russian)
Luriya, A.R. (1925). Psychoanalysis as a system of monistic psychology. Psihologiia I marksizm: sb. st. (47– 80) , ed. by K.N.Kornilov. Leningrad: Gosizdat Publ. Liuk, H. (2017). History of psychology: methodology and methods. Yaroslavskii pedagogicheskii vestnik, 5, 194–203. (In Russian)
Mazilov, V.A. (2014). History of psychology and philosophy of psychology: interaction needed. Vestnik VyatGU, 2, 94–100. (In Russian)
Mironenko, I.A. (2019). Biosocial problem and the formation of global psychology. Moscow: Institut psihologii RAN Press. (In Russian)
Mironenko, I.A., Zhuravlev A.L. (2019). Biosocial problem in the context of global psychological science: on the universal characteristics of a person. Psihologicheskii zhurnal, 6 (40), 87–98. (In Russian)
Nestik, T.A., Zhuravlev, A.L., Iurevich, A.V. (2016). Forecast of the development of psychological science and practice by 2030. Yaroslavskii pedagogicheskii vestnik, 5, 177–192.
Popper, K.P. (1993). The Poverty of Historicism / transl. from Eng. By S. Kudrina. Moscow: Progress VIA Publ. (In Russian)
Prokhorenko I.A. (2010). The main directions of foreign historiography of General history (from antiquity to the end of the 20th century) . Tolyatti: TGU Publ. (In Russian)
Rutherford, A. (2009). History’s mysteries demystified: Becoming a psychologist-historian. American journal of psychology, 1 (122), 117–129.
Spengler, O. (1991). The Decline of the West. New York: Oxford UP.
Udal’tsov V.G., Mrochko L.V. (2017). Socio-philosophical understanding of history: necessity and significance. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’no-gumanitarnye issledovaniia, 2 (14), 49–54. (In Russian)
Valsiner, J. (2012). A guided science: history of psychology in the mirror of its making. New Brunswick, Transaction Publishers.
Wertheimer, M. (2000). A brief history of psychology. San Diego, Harcourt College Publishers.
Yaroshevskii, M.G. (1961). Problems of determinism in psychophysiology of the 20th century. Dushanbe. (In Russian)
Yaroshevskii, M.G. (1995). Historical psychology of science. St. Petersburg: Izd-vo Mezhdunarodnogo fonda istorii nauki. (In Russian)
Zhuravlev, A.L., Mironenko, I.A., Yurevich, A.V. (2018). Psychological Science in the Global World. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 5 (88), 385–393.
Downloads
Published
2021-12-30
How to Cite
Rafikova, V., & Mironenko, I. (2021). Actual tendencies of the methodology of the history of psychology in light of the philosophic and methodological problems of historiography. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology, 11(4), 312–325. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2021.402
Issue
Section
Theoretical and Methodological Problems in Psychology
License
Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.
