Условия возникновения негативного прайминг-эффекта

Авторы

  • Дарья Игоревна Костина Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет, Российская Федерация, 199034, Санкт-Петербург, Университетская наб., 7–9

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu16.2017.104

Аннотация

Как показано в ряде исследований, негативный прайминг-эффект (НП), проявляющийся в замедлении реакции на целевой стимул, может наблюдаться после предъявления совпадающего или связанного с ним прайма. Однако эти же условия характерны и для проявления позитивного прайминга. Возникновение НП зависит от целого ряда факторов, причем многие из  них, будучи необходимым для возникновения НП в  одних условиях, теряют свое значение в других. Мы предполагаем, что ряд возникающих противоречий можно объяснить, если предположить, что в основе негативного и позитивного прайминга лежат независимые процессы, совместно влияющие на время реакции.

Ключевые слова:

прайминг, негативный прайминг

Скачивания

Данные скачивания пока недоступны.
 

Библиографические ссылки

Литература

Фаликман М.В., Койфман А.Я. Виды прайминга в исследованиях восприятия и перцептивного внимания // Вестник Московского университета. Сер. 14. Психология. 2005. № 3. С. 86–97.

Kouider S., Dehaene S. Levels of processing during non-conscious perception: a critical review of visual masking // Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2007. Vol. 362, N 1481. P. 857–875.

Dalrymple-Alford E.C., Budayr B. Examination of some aspects of the Stroop color-word test // Perceptual and motor skills. 1966. Vol. 23, N 3. Suppl. P. 1211–1214.

Frings C., Schneider K.K., Fox E. The negative priming paradigm: An update and implications for selective attention // Psychonomic bulletin & review. 2015. Vol. 22, N 6. P. 1577–1597.

Tipper S.P. Does negative priming reflect inhibitory mechanisms? A review and integration of conflicting views // The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A. Vol. 54, N 2. P. 321–343.

Milliken B., Joordens S., Merikle P.M., Seiffert A.E. Selective attention: A reevaluation of the implications of negative priming // Psychological review. 1998. Vol. 105, N 2. P. 203–229.

Neill W.T. Inhibitory and facilitatory processes in selective attention // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1977. Vol. 3, N 3. P. 444–450.

Neill W.T., Valdes L.A. Persistence of negative priming: Steady state or decay? // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1992. Vol. 18, N 3. P. 565–575.

Rothermund K., Wentura D., De Houwer J. Retrieval of incidental stimulus-response associations as a source of negative priming // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 2005. Vol. 31, N 3. P. 482–495.

Chao H.F. Locus of single-prime negative priming: The role of perceptual form // Acta psychologica. 2013. Vol. 143, N 3. P. 303–309.

Fox E. Interference and negative priming from ignored distractors: The role of selection difficulty // Attention, Perception & Psychophysics. 1994. Vol. 56, N 5. P. 565–574.

Neill W.T., Westberry R.L. Selective attention and the suppression of cognitive noise // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1987. Vol. 13, N 2. P. 327–334.

Neumann E., Deschepper B.G. An inhibition-based fan effect: Evidence for an active suppression mechanism in selective attention // Canadian Journal of Psychology. 1992. Vol. 46, N 1. Р. 1–40. 14. Lowe D.G. Further investigations of inhibitory mechanisms in attention // Memory & Cognition. 1985. Vol. 13, N 1. Р. 74–80.

Tipper S.P., Cranston M. Selective attention and priming: Inhibitory and facilitatory effects of ignored primes // The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1985. Vol. 37, N 4. Р. 591–611.

Moore C.M. Negative priming depends on probe-trial conflict: Where has all the inhibition gone? // Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. 1994. Vol. 56, N 2. Р. 133–147.

D’Angelo M.C., Milliken B. Context-specific control in the single-prime negative-priming procedure // The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2012. Vol. 65, N 5. Р. 887–910.

Frings C., Wentura D. Strategy effects counteract distractor inhibition: Negative priming with constantly absent probe distractors // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2006. Vol. 32, N 4. Р. 854–864.

Frings C., Spence C. Increased perceptual and conceptual processing difficulty makes the immeasurable measurable: Negative priming in the absence of probe distractors // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2011. Vol. 37, N 1. Р. 72–84.

Ortells J.J., Fox E., Noguera C., Abad M.J. Repetition priming effects from attended vs. ignored single words in a semantic categorization task // Acta Psychologica. 2003. Vol. 114, N 2. Р. 185–210.

Костина Д.И., Аллахвердов В.М. Негативный прайминг-эффект как проявление последействия негативного выбора // Петербургский психологический журнал. 2016. № 17. С. 69–103.

Engle R.W., Conway A.R., Tuholski S.W., Shisler R.J. A resource account of inhibition // Psychological Science. 1995. Vol. 6, N 2. Р. 122–125.

Conway A.R., Tuholski S.W., Shisler R.J., Engle R.W. The effect of memory load on negative priming: An individual differences investigation // Memory & Cognition. 1999. Vol. 27, N 6. Р. 1042–1050.

Chao H.F., Yeh Y.Y. Controlled processing in single-prime negative priming // Experimental psychology. 2008. Vol. 55, N 6. Р. 402–408.

Malley G.B., Strayer D.L. Effect of stimulus repetition on positive and negative identity priming // Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. 1995. Vol. 57, N 5. Р. 657–667.

Strayer D.L., Grison S. Negative identity priming is contingent on stimulus repetition // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1999. Vol. 25, N 1. Р. 24–38.

DeSchepper B., Treisman A. Visual memory for novel shapes: implicit coding without attention // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1996. Vol. 22, N 1. Р. 27–47.

Leboe J., Milliken B. Single‐prime negative priming in the shape‐matching task: Implications for the role of perceptual segmentation processes // Visual cognition. 2004. Vol. 11, N 5. Р. 603–630.

Wong K.F.E. Negative Priming Under Rapid Serial Visual Presentation // PloS one. 2012. Vol. 7, N 5. e37023.

Lavie N., Fox E. The role of perceptual load in negative priming // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2000. Vol. 26, N 3. Р. 1038–1052.

Raz A., Campbell N.K.J. Can suggestion obviate reading? Supplementing primary Stroop evidence with exploratory negative priming analyses // Consciousness and cognition. 2011. Vol. 20, N 2. Р. 312–320.

Richards A. The effects of cueing target location and response mode on interference and negative priming using a visual selection paradigm // The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A. 1999. Vol. 52, N 2. Р. 449–463.

Paquet L. Eliminating flanker effects and negative priming in the flankers task: Evidence for early selection // Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2001. Vol. 8, N 2. Р. 301–306.

de Fockert J.W., Mizon G.A., D’ubaldo M. No negative priming without cognitive control // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2010. Vol. 36, N 6. Р. 1333–1341.

Response-retrieval in identity negative priming is modulated by temporal discriminability / Mittner M., Behrendt J., Menge U., Titz C., Hasselhorn M. // Frontiers in psychology. 2014. Vol. 5. 621. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00621.

Response-retrieval and negative priming / Ihrke M., Behrendt J., Schrobsdorff H., Herrmann J.M., Hasselhorn M. // Experimental psychology. 2011. Vol. 58. Р. 154–161.

Negative priming persists in the absence of response-retrieval / Ihrke M., Behrendt J., Schrobsdorff H., Visser I., Hasselhorn M. // Experimental psychology. 2013. Vol. 60. P. 12–21.

Frings C., Wentura D. Separating context and trial-by-trial effects in the negative priming paradigm // European Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 2008. Vol. 20, N 2. P. 195–210.

Fox E. Negative priming from ignored distractors in visual selection: A review // Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 1995. Vol. 2, N 2. Р. 145–173.

Neill W.T., Kahan T.A. Response conflict reverses priming: A replication // Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 1999. Vol. 6, N 2. С. 304–308.

Bodner G.E., Masson M.E.J. Prime validity affects masked repetition priming: Evidence for an episodic resource account of priming // Journal of Memory and Language. 2001. Vol. 45, N 4. P. 616–647.

Leboe J.P., Leboe L.C., Milliken B. Another look at the effect of a surprising intervening event on negative priming // Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2003. Vol. 57, N 2. Р. 115–124.

Dagenbach D., Carr T.H., Wilhelmsen A.L. Task-induced strategies and near-threshold priming: Conscious influences on unconscious perception // Journal of Memory and Language. 1989. Vol. 28, N 4. P. 412–443.

References

Falikman M.V., Koifman A.Ya. Vidy praiminga v issledovaniiakh vospriiatiia i pertseptivnogo vnimaniia [The types of priming in the researches of perception and perceptual attention]. Vestnik of Moscow University. Series 14. Psychology, 2005, no. 3, pp. 86–97. (In Russian)

Kouider S., Dehaene S. Levels of processing during non-conscious perception: a critical review of visual masking. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2007, vol. 362, no. 1481, pp. 857–875.

Dalrymple-Alford E.C., Budayr B. Examination of some aspects of the Stroop color-word test. Perceptual and motor skills, 1966, vol. 23, no. 3. Suppl, pp. 1211–1214.

Frings C., Schneider K.K., Fox E. The negative priming paradigm: An update and implications for selective attention. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2015, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1577–1597.

Tipper S.P. Does negative priming reflect inhibitory mechanisms? A review and integration of conflicting views. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 321–343.

Milliken B., Joordens S., Merikle P.M., Seiffert A.E. Selective attention: A reevaluation of the implications of negative priming. Psychological review, 1998, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 203–229.

Neill W.T. Inhibitory and facilitatory processes in selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1977, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 444–450.

Neill W.T., Valdes L.A. Persistence of negative priming: Steady state or decay? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1992, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 565–575.

Rothermund K., Wentura D., De Houwer J. Retrieval of incidental stimulus-response associations as a source of negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2005, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 482–495.

Chao H.F. Locus of single-prime negative priming: The role of perceptual form. Acta psychological, 2013, vol. 143, no. 3, pp. 303–309.

Fox E. Interference and negative priming from ignored distractors: The role of selection difficulty. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 1994, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 565–574.

Neill W.T., Westberry R.L. Selective attention and the suppression of cognitive noise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1987, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 327–334.

Neumann E., Deschepper B.G. An inhibition-based fan effect: Evidence for an active suppression mechanism in selective attention. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1992, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 1–40.

Lowe D.G. Further investigations of inhibitory mechanisms in attention. Memory & Cognition, 1985, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 74–80.

Tipper S.P., Cranston M. Selective attention and priming: Inhibitory and facilitatory effects of ignored primes. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1985, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 591–611.

Moore C.M. Negative priming depends on probe-trial conflict: Where has all the inhibition gone? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 1994, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 133–147.

D’Angelo M.C., Milliken B. Context-specific control in the single-prime negative-priming procedure. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2012, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 887–910.

Frings C., Wentura D. Strategy effects counteract distractor inhibition: Negative priming with constantly absent probe distractors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2006, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 854–864.

Frings C., Spence C. Increased perceptual and conceptual processing difficulty makes the immeasurable measurable: Negative priming in the absence of probe distractors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2011, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 72–84.

Ortells J.J., Fox E., Noguera C., Abad M.J. Repetition priming effects from attended vs. ignored single words in a semantic categorization task. Acta Psychologica, 2003, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 185–210.

Kostina D.I., Allakhverdov V.M. Allakhverdov V.M.Negativnyi praiming-effekt kak proiavlenie posledeistviia negativnogo vybora [Negative Priming Effect as a Manifestation of the Negative Choice Aftereffect]. Peterburgskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 2016, no. 17, pp. 69–103. (In Russian)

Engle R.W., Conway A.R., Tuholski S.W., Shisler R.J. A resource account of inhibition. Psychological Science, 1995, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 122–125.

Conway A.R., Tuholski S.W., Shisler R.J., Engle R.W. The effect of memory load on negative priming: An individual differences investigation. Memory & Cognition, 1999, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 1042–1050.

Chao H.F., Yeh Y.Y. Controlled processing in single-prime negative priming. Experimental psychology, 2008, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 402–408.

Malley G.B., Strayer D.L. Effect of stimulus repetition on positive and negative identity priming. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 1995, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 657–667.

Strayer D.L., Grison S. Negative identity priming is contingent on stimulus repetition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1999, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 24–38.

DeSchepper B., Treisman A. Visual memory for novel shapes: implicit coding without attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1996, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 27–47.

Leboe J., Milliken B. Single-prime negative priming in the shape-matching task: Implications for the role of perceptual segmentation processes. Visual cognition, 2004, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 603–630.

Wong K.F.E. Negative Priming Under Rapid Serial Visual Presentation. PloS one, 2012, vol. 7, no. 5. e37023.

Lavie N., Fox E. The role of perceptual load in negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2000, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1038–1052.

Raz A., Campbell N.K.J. Can suggestion obviate reading? Supplementing primary Stroop evidence with exploratory negative priming analyses. Consciousness and cognition, 2011, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 312–320.

Richards A. The effects of cueing target location and response mode on interference and negative priming using a visual selection paradigm. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 1999, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 449–463.

Paquet L. Eliminating flanker effects and negative priming in the flankers task: Evidence for early selection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2001, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 301–306.
de Fockert J.W., Mizon G.A., D’ubaldo M. No negative priming without cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2010, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1333–1341.

Mittner M., Behrendt J., Menge U., Titz C., Hasselhorn M. Response-retrieval in identity negative priming is modulated by temporal discriminability. Frontiers in psychology, 2014, vol. 5. 621. doi:10.3389/ fpsyg.2014.00621.

Ihrke M., Behrendt J., Schrobsdorff H., Herrmann J.M., Hasselhorn M. Response-retrieval and negative priming. Experimental psychology, 2011, vol. 58, pp. 154–161.

Ihrke M., Behrendt J., Schrobsdorff H., Visser I., Hasselhorn M. Negative priming persists in the absence of response-retrieval. Experimental psychology, 2013, vol. 60, pp. 12–21.

Frings C., Wentura D. Separating context and trial-by-trial effects in the negative priming paradigm. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2008, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 195–210.

Fox E. Negative priming from ignored distractors in visual selection: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1995, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 145–173.

Neill W.T., Kahan T.A. Response conflict reverses priming: A replication. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1999, vol. 6, no. 2. С. 304–308.

Bodner G.E., Masson M.E.J. Prime validity affects masked repetition priming: Evidence for an episodic resource account of priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 2001, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 616–647.

Leboe J.P., Leboe L.C., Milliken B. Another look at the effect of a surprising intervening event on negative priming. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2003, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 115–124.

Dagenbach D., Carr T.H., Wilhelmsen A.L. Task-induced strategies and near-threshold priming: Conscious influences on unconscious perception. Journal of Memory and Language, 1989, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 412–443.

Загрузки

Опубликован

25.04.2017

Как цитировать

Костина, Д. И. (2017). Условия возникновения негативного прайминг-эффекта. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Психология, 7(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu16.2017.104

Выпуск

Раздел

Общая психология, психология личности, история психологии