On the nature of psychological sovereignty: Relation to the temper
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu16.2018.405Abstract
The psychological sovereignty is an adaptive agency’s feature, contributing to maintaining of subjective well-being in its different aspects and therefore extremely required in everyday life. The empirical study is devoted to the clarification of the nature of psychological sovereignty as a personality trait — to what extent it is set and limited by the psychophysiological characteristics of the individual? The theoretical basis of research is the Theory of psychological sovereignty by S.K.Nartova-Bochaver, the Special theory of individuality by V.M.Rusalov, the Reinforcement sensitivity theory by J.Gray, and the Theory of selfregulation by E.Higgins and A.Kruglyansky. The sample consisted of 260 respondents, mainly students (55 male, Mage=20.7). The following tools were used: “the Sovereignty of psychological space — 2010” questionnaire (Nartova-Bochaver, 2014), the BIS/BAS scales (Carver & White, 1994), the Locomotion and Assessment scales (Kruglyansky et al., 2000), and the Promotion/Prevention Scale (Lockwood, Jordan, & Kunda, 2002). Significant negative connections of sovereignty were found only with the characteristics suppressing behavioural activity; links with the parameters of activation of behaviour were not. Pair regression analysis showed that inhibition and prevention represented anti-predictors of sovereignty; psychophysiological predictors of strengthening the sovereignty were not detected. The results are discussed from the point of view of the Trait theory of personality by G.Allport and Model of Traits as situational sensitivities (TASS) by M.Marshall and J.Braun. The conclusion is made that psychological sovereignty, being a content characteristic of personality, develops in vivo as a result of the person’s experience in resolving potentially depriving situations. The results are discussed in the context of the prospects for the development of sovereignty; the risk group for the development of sovereignty is identified. Nevertheless, the weak regression models revealed ample pedagogical, educational and psychotherapeutic opportunities for stimulating sovereignty.
Keywords:
the psychological sovereignty, temper, inhibition, activation, locomotion, assessment, promotion, prevention
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Литература
Водинчар Е.А., Орлик Л.А. Взаимосвязь суверенности психологического пространства человека и специфики его межличностных отношений // Вестник КРАУНЦ. Гуманитарные науки. 2016. Т. 27, № 1. С. 48–56.
Нартова-Бочавер С.К. Психологическая суверенность как предиктор эмоциональной устойчивости в ранней и средней взрослости // Клиническая и специальная психология. 2015. Т. 4, № 1. С. 15–28. URL: http://psyjournals.ru/files/75890/psyclin_2015_n1_Nartova-Bochaver_2.pdf (дата обращения: 10.06.2018).
Сафонова М.В., Тихонова Д.А. Сравнительный анализ профилей суверенности подростков с различными уровнями психологической суверенности // Вестник Красноярского государственного педагогического университета им. В.П.Астафьева. 2017. Т. 41, № 3. С. 114–125.
Сафонова М.В., Тихонова Д.А. Удовлетворенность жизнью подростков с различными уровнями психологической суверенности // Вестник Красноярского государственного педагогического университета им. В.П.Астафьева. 2017. Т. 42, № 4. С. 126–139.
Харламенкова Н.Е. Психологическая безопасность и суверенность личности при выраженном посттравматическом стрессе // Гуманитарные исследования в Восточной Сибири и на Дальнем Востоке. 2015. Т. 34, № 4. С. 90–97.
Шаповаленко А.А. Диагностика характеристик личностной суверенности в интернет-среде: разработка опросника // Ученые записки Российского государственного социального университета. 2015. Т. 14, № 2 (129). С. 20–25.
Щукина М.А., Жданова А.А. Зоны психологического пространства личности // Петербургский психологический журнал. 2017. № 18. С. 112–139.
Викдорова Н.А. Особенности содержательных характеристик суверенности подростков, воспитывающихся в приемных семьях // Политематический сетевой электронный научный журнал Кубанского государственного аграрного университета. 2016. № 124. С. 708–719. URL: https://elibrary.ru/ download/elibrary_28103285_20134560.pdf (дата обращения: 10.06.2018).
Нартова-Бочавер С.К. Онтогенез психологической суверенности личности // Психология зрелости и старения. 2005. № 1. С. 102–113.
Нартова-Бочавер С.К., Силина О.В. Динамика развития психологических границ на протяжении детства //Актуальные проблемы психологического знания. 2014. Т. 32, № 3. С. 13–28.
Коцюбинский А.П., Бутома Б.Г. Новая организационная форма реабилитации психически больных — комплекс «круглосуточный стационар (с открытыми дверями) — дневной стационар» // Обозрение психиатрии и медицинской психологии им. В.М.Бехтерева. 2017. № 1. С. 70–74.
Казакова Т.В. Проявление жизненного самоосуществления у педагогов с разным уровнем суверенности психологического пространства // Информация и образование: границы коммуникаций. 2012. Т. 4 (12). С. 164–165.
Олпорт Г. Становление личности. Избранные труды. М.: Смысл, 2002. 462 c.
Русалов В.М. Теоретические проблемы построения специальной теории индивидуальности человека // Психологический журнал. 1986. Т. 7, № 4. С. 23–35.
Carver C. S., White T.L. Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: the BIS/BAS scales // Journal of personality and social psychology. 1994. Vol. 67, N 2. P. 319–333.
Gray J.A. Perspectives on anxiety and impulsivity: A commentary // Journal of Research in Personality. 1987. Vol. 21, N 4. P. 493–509.
Kruglanski A.W., Thompson E.P., Higgins E.T., Atash M.N., Pierro A., Shah J.Y., Spiegel S. To “do the right thing” or to “just do it”: Locomotion and assessment as distinct self-regulatory imperatives // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2000. Vol. 79, N 5. P. 793–815.
Lockwood P., Jordan H., Kunda Z. Motivation by positive or negative role models: regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2002. Vol.83, N 4. P.854–864.
Нартова-Бочавер С.К. Психология суверенности: десять лет спустя. M.: Смысл, 2017. 200 с.
Marshall M.A., Brown J.D. Trait aggressiveness and situational provocation: A test of the traits as situational sensitivities (TASS) model // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2006. Vol. 32, N 8. P. 1100–1113.
Нартова-Бочавер С.К. Принцип дополнительности в психологии: взаимодействие дома и его обитателей // Психологические исследования личности: история, современное состояние, перспективы / под ред. М.И.Воловиковой, А.Л.Журавлева, Н.Е.Харламенковой. М.: Когито-Центр, 2016. С. 192–213.
References
Vodinchar E.A., Orlik L.A. Vzaimosviaz’ suverennosti psikhologicheskogo prostranstva cheloveka i spetsifiki ego mezhlichnostnykh otnoshenii [Connection of the person’s psychological space sovereignty and specificity their interpersonal relationships]. Vestnik KRAUNTs. Gumanitarnye nauki [Herald of KRAUNTS. Humanitarian sciences], 2016, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 48–56. (In Russian)
Nartova-Bochaver S.K. Psikhologicheskaia suverennost’ kak prediktor emotsional’noi ustoichivosti v rannei i srednei vzroslosti [The psychological sovereignty as a predictor of emotional resilience in youth and early adulthood]. Klinicheskaia i spetsial’naia psikhologiia [Clinical psychology and special education], 2015, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 15–28. Available at: http://psyjournals.ru/files/75890/psyclin_2015_n1_NartovaBochaver_2.pdf (accessed: 10.06.2018). (In Russian)
Safonova M.V., Tihonova D.A. Sravnitel’nyi analiz profilei suverennosti podrostkov s razlichnymi urovniami psikhologicheskoi suverennosti [Comparative analysis of the sovereignty profiles of adolescents with different levels of psychological sovereignty]. Vestnik Krasnoiarskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. V.P.Astaf’eva [Bulletin of the Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University named after V.P.Astaf’ev], 2017, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 114–125. (In Russian)
Safonova M.V., Tihonova D.A. Udovletvorennost’ zhizn’iu podrostkov s razlichnymi urovniami psikhologicheskoi suverennosti [Satisfaction with the life of adolescents with different levels of psychological sovereignty]. Vestnik Krasnoiarskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. V.P.Astaf’eva [Bulletin of the Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University named after V.P.Astaf’ev], 2017, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 126–139. (In Russian)
Harlamenkova N.E. Psikhologicheskaia bezopasnost’ i suverennost’ lichnosti pri vyrazhennom posttravmaticheskom stresse [Psychological security and sovereignty of a person with expressed posttraumatic stress]. Gumanitarnye issledovaniia v Vostochnoi Sibiri i na Dal’nem Vostoke [Humanitarian research in Eastern Siberia and the Far East], 2015, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 90–97. (In Russian)
Shapovalenko A.A. Diagnostika kharakteristik lichnostnoi suverennosti v internet-srede: razrabotka oprosnika [Diagnostics of the characteristics of personal sovereignty in the Internet environment: development of a questionnaire]. Uchenye zapiski Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo sotsial’nogo universiteta [ Scientific notes of the Russian State Social University], 2015, vol. 14, no. 2 (129), pp. 20–25. (In Russian)
Shchukina M.A., Zhdanova A.A.Zony psihologicheskogo prostranstva lichnosti [Zones of the psychological space of personality]. Peterburgskii psihologicheskii zhurnal [St. Petersburg Psychological Journal], 2017, no. 18, pp. 112–139. (In Russian)
Vikdorova N.A. Osobennosti soderzhatel’nykh kharakteristik suverennosti podrostkov, vospityvaiushchikhsia v priemnykh sem’iakh [Specificity of the sovereignty content in adolescents from the foster families]. Politematicheskii setevoi elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta [Polytechnical network electronic scientific journal of the Kuban State Agrarian University], 2016, no. 124, pp. 708–719. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_28103285_20134560.pdf (assessed: 10.06.2018). (In Russian)
Nartova-Bochaver S.K. Ontogenez psikhologicheskoi suverennosti lichnosti [The ontogenesis of psychological sovereignty of the person]. Psikhologiia zrelosti i stareniia[Psychology of maturity and aging], 2005, no. 1, pp. 102–113. (In Russian)
Nartova-Bochaver S.K., Silina O.V. Dinamika razvitiia psikhologicheskikh granits na protiazhenii detstva [Dynamics of psychological boundaries development during childhood]. Aktual’nye problemy psikhologicheskogo znaniia [Actual problems of psychological knowledge], 2014, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 13–28. (In Russian)
Kocyubinskij A.P., Butoma B.G. Novaia organizatsionnaia forma reabilitatsii psikhicheski bol’nykh — kompleks «kruglosutochnyi statsionar (s otkrytymi dveriami) — dnevnoi statsionar» [The new organizational form of the mental patients’ rehabilitation — complex “24-hour hospital (with open doors) — day hospital”]. Obozrenie psikhiatrii i meditsinskoi psikhologii im. V.M.Bekhtereva [Review of psychiatry and medical psychology named after V.M.Bekhterev], 2017, no. 1, pp. 70–74. (In Russian)
Kazakova T.V. Proiavlenie zhiznennogo samoosushchestvleniia u pedagogov s raznym urovnem suverennosti psikhologicheskogo prostranstva [Self-realization in teachers with different levels of sovereignty of psychological space]. Informatsiia i obrazovanie: granitsy kommunikatsii [Information and education: the boundaries of communications], 2012, no. 4 (12), pp. 164–165. (In Russian)
Olport G. Stanovlenie lichnosti: Izbrannye Trudy[Development of personality: Selected Works]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2002. 462 p. (In Russian)
Rusalov V.M. Teoreticheskie problemy postroeniia spetsial’noi teorii individual’nosti cheloveka [Theoretical problems of constructing a special theory of individuality]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal [ Psychology Journal], 1986, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 23–35. (In Russian)
Carver C. S., White T.L. Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: the BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 319–333.
Gray J.A. Perspectives on anxiety and impulsivity: A commentary. Journal of Research in Personality, 1987, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 493–509.
Kruglanski A.W., Thompson E.P., Higgins E.T., Atash M.N., Pierro A., Shah J.Y., Spiegel S. To “do the right thing” or to “just do it”: Locomotion and assessment as distinct self-regulatory imperatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2000, vol. 79, no. 5, pp. 793–815.
Lockwood P., Jordan H., Kunda Z. Motivation by positive or negative role models: regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 854–864.
Nartova-Bochaver S.K. Psikhologiia suverennosti: desiat’ let spustia[Psychology of sovereignty: ten years later]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2017. 200 p. (In Russian)
Marshall M.A., Brown J.D. Trait aggressiveness and situational provocation: A test of the traits as situational sensitivities (TASS) model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2006, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 1100–1113.
Nartova-Bochaver S.K. Printsip dopolnitel’nosti v psikhologii: vzaimodeistvie doma i ego obitatelei [The principle of complementarity in psychology: the interaction of the house and its inhabitants]. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniia lichnosti: istoriia, sovremennoe sostoianie, perspektivy [ Psychological studies of personality: history, current state, prospects]. Eds M.I.Volovikova, A.L.Zhuravlev, N.E.Harlamenkova. Moscow, Kogito-Centr, 2016, pp. 192–213. (In Russian)
Downloads
Published
2018-11-28
How to Cite
Нартова-Бочавер, С. К. (2018). On the nature of psychological sovereignty: Relation to the temper. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology, 8(4), 370–380. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu16.2018.405
Issue
Section
Theory and Methodology of Psychology
License
Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.
