The role of the number of meanings in solving problems of recalling ambiguous information

Authors

  • Natalia Andriyanova St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
  • Kira Borodina St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
  • Andrei Chukanov St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
  • Rostislav Lovtsov St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
  • Albina Odintsova St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
  • Tatyana Mamina St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3504-6258

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2025.105

Abstract

Most modern studies devoted to the processing of ambiguous information contain in the experiment procedure stimulus material with two possible semantic meanings, leaving out cases where there may be more than two possible meanings. In addition, quite a lot of attention in such studies is devoted to the phenomenon of negative choice and its interpretations, although it is still unclear how to interpret negative choice for two or more non-selected stimulus values. In this study, we made an attempt to differentiate the specifics of processing ambiguous information (if there are more than two semantic meanings) from unambiguous one. Moreover, we tried to clarify how the phenomenon of negative choice manifests itself in relation to alternative categories of choice. We conducted an experiment suggesting the need to make a conscious choice of semantic meaning for ambiguous or unambiguous words, after which it was asked to recall the initial acceptable meanings of the words. Thus, the subject was asked to solve two tasks: the installation task for choosing a semantic meaning and the main task for remembering the presented semantic meanings. The data obtained from the experiment allows us to make a difference in the processing of non-actualized word meanings: although the processing of single-valued and multi-valued meanings requires a similar amount of time, the percentage of errors while remembering multi-valued meanings is significantly higher than single-valued ones. In addition, the data obtained do not allow us to define a clear boundary between the category of negative and positive choice, since no significant differences were found between them within the framework of the proposed experimental procedure. Additionally, it was found out that the mental operations involved in the experimental procedure make it possible to more accurately predict the result of cognitive information processing than the type of information taken as the basis for the stimulus material. The findings may provide valuable contributions to future psychological neurocognitive research.

Keywords:

ambiguous information, unambiguous information, negative choice, cognitive processing, choice task, external factor, recall task

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Аллахвердов В. М. Опыт теоретической психологии (в жанре научной революции). СПб.: Печатный двор, 1993.

Аллахвердов В. М. Как сознание выбирает одно значение из многих возможных? // Петербургский психологический журнал. 2015. № 13. С. 1–13. URL: https://ppj.spbpo.ru/psy/article/view/94 (дата обращения: 24.08.2024).

Аллахвердов В. М. Сознание как парадокс. Экспериментальная психологика. Т. 1. М.: Просвещение, 2000.

Кувалдина М. Б. Феномен неосознанного негативного выбора // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Социология. 2008. № 2. С. 128–133.

Филиппова М. Г. Неосознаваемая двойственность изображений: экспериментальные проявления негативного выбора // Петербургский психологический журнал. 2016. № 16. С. 1–22. URL: https://ppj.spbpo.ru/index.php/psy/article/view/120 (дата обращения: 24.08.2024).

Филиппова М. Г., Аллахвердов В. М. Конкретизация выбранного смысла в процессе восприятия двойственных изображений // Психология. Журнал ВШЭ. 2020. Т. 17, № 2. С. 355–366. https://doi.org/10.17323/1813 8918 2020 2 356 366

Филиппова М. Г., Андриянова Н. В., Чернов Р. В. Что скрывается за «недостатками многозначности» при восприятии двойственных изображений? // Российский психологический журнал. 2023. Т. 20, № 3. С. 206–219. https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2023.3.11

Basile G. Categorization, memory and linguistic uses: What happens in the case of polysemy: abstract // Inquiries in Philosophical Pragmatics: Theoretical Developments. Berlin: Springer, 2021. P. 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/978 3 030 56437 7_8

Carston R. Polysemy: Pragmatics and sense conventions // Mind & Language. 2021. Vol. 36, no. 1. P. 108–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12329

Eagle M., Wolilzky D., Klein G. Imagery: Effect of a concealed figure in stimulus // Science. 1966. Vol. 151 (3712). P. 837–839. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.151.3712.837

Gernsbacher M. A., Varner K. R., Faust M. Investigating differences in general comprehension skill // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition. 1990. Vol. 16. P. 430–445. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0278-7393.16.3.430

Haber J., Poesio M. Polysemy — evidence from linguistics, behavioral science, and contextualized language models // Computational Linguistics. 2024. Vol. 50, no. 1. P. 351–417. https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00500

Klein D. E., Murphy G. L. The representation of polysemous words: abstract // Journal of Memory and Language. 2001. Vol. 45, no. 2. P. 259–282. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2001.2779

Liu A. Ye. Cross-modality set effect on the perception of ambiguous pictures // Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. 1976. Vol. 7. P. 331–333. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03337206

Quilty‐Dunn J. Polysemy and thought: Toward a generative theory of concepts // Mind & Language. 2021. Vol. 36, no. 1. P. 158–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12328


References

Allakhverdov, V. M. (1993). Experience of theoretical psychology (in genre of science revolution). St. Petersburg, Pechatnyi dvor Publ (In Russian)

Allakhverdov, V. M. (2000). Consciousness as a paradox. Experimental Psychologica, vol. 1. Moscow, Prosveshchenie Publ (In Russian)

Allakhverdov, V. M. (2015). How does consciousness choose one meaning out of many possible ones? Peterburgskii psihologicheskii zhurnal, no. 13, 1–13. (In Russian)

Basile, G. (2021). Categorization, memory and linguistic uses: What happens in the case of polysemy. In: Inquiries in Philosophical Pragmatics: Theoretical Developments (pp. 95–109). Berlin, Springer https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56437-7_8

Carston, R. (2021). Polysemy: Pragmatics and sense conventions. Mind & Language, 36 (1), 108–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12329

Eagle, M., Wolilzky, D., Klein, G. (1966). Imagery: Effect of a concealed figure in stimulus. Science, 151 (3712), 837–839. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.151.3712.837

Filippova, M. G. (2016). The unconscious duality of images: Experimental manifestations of negative choice. Peterburgskii psihologicheskii zhurnal, 17, 1–22. Available at: https://ppj.spbpo.ru/index.php/psy/article/view/120. (In Russian)

Filippova, M. G., Allakhverdov, V. M. (2020). Concretization of the chosen meaning in the process of perception of dual images. Psikhologiia. Zhurnal HSE University, 17 (2), 355–366. https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2020-2-356-366 (In Russian)

Filippova, M. G., Andriyanova, N. V., Chernov, R. V. (2023). What is hidden behind the “disadvantages of ambiguity” in the perception of dual images? Rossiiskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 20 (3), 206–219. https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2023.3.11 (In Russian)

Gernsbacher, M. A., Varner, K. R., Faust, M. E. (1990). Investigating differences in general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16 (3), 430. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0278-7393.16.3.430

Haber, J., Poesio, M. (2024). Polysemy — evidence from linguistics, behavioral science, and contextualized language models. Computational Linguistics, 50 (1), 351–417. https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00500

Klein, D. E., Murphy, G. L. (2001). The representation of polysemous words. Journal of Memory and Language, 45 (2), 259–282. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2001.2779

Kuvaldina, M. B. (2008). The phenomenon of unconscious negative choice. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology, 2, 128–133. (In Russian)

Liu, A. Ye. (1976). Cross-modality set effect on the perception of ambiguous pictures. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 7 (3), 331–333. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03337206

Quilty‐Dunn, J. (2021). Polysemy and thought: Toward a generative theory of concepts. Mind & Language, 36 (1), 158–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12328

Downloads

Published

2025-05-21

How to Cite

Andriyanova, N., Borodina, K., Chukanov, A., Lovtsov, R., Odintsova, A., & Mamina, T. (2025). The role of the number of meanings in solving problems of recalling ambiguous information. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology, 15(1), 81–102. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2025.105

Issue

Vol. 15 No. 1 (2025)

Section

Empirical and Experimental Research

License

Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.